Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion History Main / FamilyUnfriendlyAesop

Go To

Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
The key point about this trope that many tend to overlook is that an example has to fit the \
to:
The key point about this trope that many tend to overlook is that an example has to fit the \\\"Aesop\\\" bit \\\'\\\'as well as\\\'\\\' \\\"Family Unfriendly\\\". I\\\'m assuming that the play involves a married man who enters an extramarital relationship with another man. Are his actions presented as \\\"good\\\", or at least understandable/inevitable? Or does the play simply show his choices without commentating on their morality, or leave it ambiguous? It has to be the former to qualify, and the example should incorporate how we know this is the case.

If you want to add it back, can you please add more context (e.g. the action of characters, relevant plot summary, dialogue) to show that the trope isn\\\'t being misused?
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I removed it because I felt that it lacked context - the example states what the aesop was, but not how it was shown in the play. With the rampant misuse of this trope, I want to be sure that every example is using the trope correctly. It also seems like an UnfortunateImplications entry as it stands, though that might fix itself once there\'s more elaboration.
to:
I removed it because I felt that it lacked context - the example states what the aesop was, but not how it was shown in the play. With the rampant misuse of this trope, I want to be sure that every example is using the trope correctly, and that means they need context. It also seems like an UnfortunateImplications entry as it stands, though that might fix itself once there\\\'s more elaboration.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
The key point about this trope that many tend to overlook is that an example has to fit the \
to:
The key point about this trope that many tend to overlook is that an example has to fit the \\\"Aesop\\\" bit \\\'\\\'as well as\\\'\\\' \\\"Family Unfriendly\\\". I\\\'m assuming that the play involves a married man who enters an extramarital relationship with another man. Are his actions presented as \\\"good\\\", or at least understandable/inevitable? Or does the play simply show his choices without commentating on their morality, or leave it ambiguous? It has to be the former to qualify.

If you want to add it back, can you please add more context (e.g. the action of characters, relevant plot summary, dialogue) to show that the trope isn\\\'t being misused?
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I removed it because I felt that it lacked context - the example states what the aesop was, but not how it was shown in the play. It also seems like an UnfortunateImplications entry as it stands, though that might fix itself once there\'s more elaboration.
to:
I removed it because I felt that it lacked context - the example states what the aesop was, but not how it was shown in the play. With the rampant misuse of this trope, I want to be sure that every example is using the trope correctly. It also seems like an UnfortunateImplications entry as it stands, though that might fix itself once there\\\'s more elaboration.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
The key point about this trope that many tend to overlook is that an example has to fit the \
to:
The key point about this trope that many tend to overlook is that an example has to fit the \\\"Aesop\\\" bit \\\'\\\'as well as\\\'\\\' \\\"Family Unfriendly\\\". I\\\'m assuming that the play involves a married man who enters an extramarital relationship with another man. Are his actions presented as \\\"good\\\", or at least understandable/inevitable? Or does the play simply show his choices without commentating on their morality, or leave it ambiguous? It has to be the former to qualify.

If you want to add it back, can you please add more context (e.g. the action of characters, relevant plot summary, dialogue) to show that the trope isn\\\'t being misused?
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
The key point about this trope that many tend to overlook is that an example has to fit the \
to:
The key point about this trope that many tend to overlook is that an example has to fit the \\\"Aesop\\\" bit \\\'\\\'as well as\\\'\\\' \\\"Family Unfriendly\\\". I\\\'m assuming that the play involves a married man who enters an extramarital relationship with another man. Are his actions presented as \\\"good\\\", or at least understandable/inevitable? Or does the play simply show his choices without commentating on their morality, or leave it ambiguous? It has to be the former to qualify.

If you want to add it back, can you please add more context (e.g. the action of characters, relevant plot summary, dialogue) to show that the trope isn\\\'t being misused?
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
The key point about this trope that many tend to overlook is that an example has to fit the \
to:
The key point about this trope that many tend to overlook is that an example has to fit the \\\"Aesop\\\" bit \\\'\\\'as well as\\\'\\\' \\\"Family Unfriendly\\\". I\\\'m assuming that the play involves a married man who enters an extramarital relationship with another man. Are his actions presented as \\\"good\\\", or at least understandable/inevitable? Or does the play simply show his choices without commentating on their morality, or leave it ambiguous? It has to be the former to qualify.

If you want to add it back, can you please add more context (e.g. the action of characters, relevant plot summary, dialogue)?
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
The key point about this trope that many tend to overlook is that an example has to fit the \
to:
The key point about this trope that many tend to overlook is that an example has to fit the \\\"Aesop\\\" bit \\\'\\\'as well as\\\'\\\' \\\"Family Unfriendly\\\". I\\\'m assuming that the play involves a married man who enters an extramarital relationship with another man. Are his actions presented as \\\"good\\\", or at least understandable/inevitable? Or does the play simply show his choices without commentating on his morality, or leave it ambiguous? It has to be the former to qualify.

If you want to add it back, can you please add more context (e.g. the action of characters, relevant plot summary, dialogue)?
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I removed it because I felt that it lacked context - the example states what the aesop was, but not how it was shown in the play. It also seems like an UnfortunateImplications entry as it stands, though that might fix itself once there\'s more elaboration. The key point about this trope that many tend to overlook is that an example has to fit the \
to:
I removed it because I felt that it lacked context - the example states what the aesop was, but not how it was shown in the play. It also seems like an UnfortunateImplications entry as it stands, though that might fix itself once there\\\'s more elaboration.

The key point about this trope that many tend to overlook is that an example has to fit the \\\"Aesop\\\" bit \\\'\\\'as well as\\\'\\\' \\\"Family Unfriendly\\\". I\\\'m assuming that the play involves a married man who enters an extramarital relationship with another man. Are his actions presented as \\\"good\\\", or at least understandable/inevitable? Or does the play simply depict his life without commentating on his morality, or leave it ambiguous? It has to be the former to qualify.

If you want to add it back, can you please add more context (e.g. the action of characters, relevant plot summary, dialogue)?
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I removed it because I felt that it lacked context - the example states what the aesop was, but not how it was shown in the play. It also seems like an UnfortunateImplications entry as it stands, but that might fix itself once there\'s more elaboration. If you want to add it back, can you please add more context (e.g. the action of characters, relevant plot summary, dialogue)?
to:
I removed it because I felt that it lacked context - the example states what the aesop was, but not how it was shown in the play. It also seems like an UnfortunateImplications entry as it stands, though that might fix itself once there\\\'s more elaboration. The key point about this trope that many tend to overlook is that an example has to fit the \\\"Aesop\\\" bit \\\'\\\'as well as\\\'\\\' \\\"Family Unfriendly\\\". I\\\'m assuming that the play involves a married man who enters an extramarital relationship with another man. Are his actions presented as \\\"good\\\", or at least understandable/inevitable? Or does the play simply depict his life without commentating on his morality, or leave it ambiguous? It has to be the former to qualify.
If you want to add it back, can you please add more context (e.g. the action of characters, relevant plot summary, dialogue)?
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I removed it because I felt that it lacked context - the example states what the aesop was, but not how it was shown in the play. It also felt a little like complaining, but that might fix itself once there\'s more elaboration. If you want to add it back, can you please add more context (e.g. the action of characters, relevant plot summary, dialogue)?
to:
I removed it because I felt that it lacked context - the example states what the aesop was, but not how it was shown in the play. It also seems like an UnfortunateImplications entry as it stands, but that might fix itself once there\\\'s more elaboration. If you want to add it back, can you please add more context (e.g. the action of characters, relevant plot summary, dialogue)?
Changed line(s) 8 from:
n
** Even before any of that is Goblet of Fire which ends with the Harry witnessing the death of a classmate (indeed the first \
to:

** Even before any of that is Goblet of Fire which ends with the Harry witnessing the death of a classmate (indeed the first \\\"on screen\\\" death in the series) and the return of Magic Hitler. Not to mention that almost no one believes him and many people think he\\\'s responsible for killing Cedric.

That\\\'s not HowToWriteAnExample. Put titles in italics and use correct ExampleIndentation.

----
WordCruft: Don\\\'t introduce new examples by sub-bullets.
** If you think that is Downer Ending. Read the Next Book. For starters - [[spoiler:Harry\\\'s Car, Office and Flat gets blown up.]]. Oh and [[spoiler:Susan turns and Harry has to kill her]]....Oh and [[spoiler:he kills her for genocide-black-magic-ritual ]]. OH and he is also [[spoiler:Winter Knight now]]....and [[spoiler:quite dead from getting shot in the heart by a sniper....just a few minutes after he starts some sort of romance with Murphy...OUCH...]]
Top