Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion History Main / ChaoticNeutral

Go To

Changed line(s) 7 from:
n
Also, I think you\'re taking the \
to:
Also, I think you\\\'re taking the \\\"failure\\\" part of StockFootageFailure a little too seriously. It\\\'s just a trope name, not an insult. You could call it [=\\\"Stock Footage Slip-Up\\\"=] and it would be exactly the same.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
It\'s really not a stretch to think that the intent was to completely edit out the sentai-exclusive rangers, and that any appearance of them in Power Rangers is simply an editing slip-up. On the other hand, your theory appears to rely on several different assumptions that are impossible to definitively prove or disprove at this time, and outright ignores much the available information. It comes down to OccamsRazor: With all else being equal, choose the simplest explanation. And to me, the editors making a mistake is the simpler explanation.
to:
It\\\'s really not a stretch to think that the intent was to completely edit out the sentai-exclusive rangers, and that any appearance of them in Power Rangers is simply an editing slip-up. On the other hand, your theory appears to rely on several different assumptions that are impossible to definitively prove or disprove at this time, and outright ignores the available information. It comes down to OccamsRazor: With all else being equal, choose the simplest explanation. And to me, the editors making a mistake is the simpler explanation.
Changed line(s) 7 from:
n
Also, I think you\'re taking the \
to:
Also, I think you\\\'re taking the \\\"failure\\\" part of StockFootageFailure a little too seriously. It\\\'s just a trope name, not an insult. You could call it [=\\\"StockFootageSlip-Up\\\"=] and it would be exactly the same.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
It\'s really not a stretch to think that the intent was to completely edit out the sentai-exclusive rangers, and that any appearance of them in Power Rangers is simply an editing slip-up. On the other hand, your theory appears to rely on several different assumptions that are impossible to definitively prove or disprove at this time, and outright ignores much the available information. It comes down to Occam\'s Razor: With all else being equal, choose the simplest explanation. And to me, the editors making a mistake is the simpler explanation.
to:
It\\\'s really not a stretch to think that the intent was to completely edit out the sentai-exclusive rangers, and that any appearance of them in Power Rangers is simply an editing slip-up. On the other hand, your theory appears to rely on several different assumptions that are impossible to definitively prove or disprove at this time, and outright ignores much the available information. It comes down to OccamsRazor: With all else being equal, choose the simplest explanation. And to me, the editors making a mistake is the simpler explanation.
Changed line(s) 7 from:
n
Also, I think you\'re taking the \
to:
Also, I think you\\\'re taking the \\\"failure\\\" part of StockFootageFailure a little too seriously. It\\\'s just a trope name, not an insult. You could call it [=\\\"StockFootageSlip-Up\\\"=] and it would be exactly the same.
Top