[005]
94.9.139.139
Current Version
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
* What bugs me is that people who reference his works to make some kind of point apparently only heard the parts that support their argument and everything else is just \
to:
* What bugs me is that people who reference his works to make some kind of point apparently only heard the parts that support their argument and everything else is just \\\"Blah blah blah shit blah blah blah fuck blah blah blah swear.\\\"
*What\\\'s with all this Yahtzee-bashing over the most trivial stuff? Has it not occurred to anyone that the guy is \\\'\\\'human,\\\'\\\' and therefore is bound to contradict himself some or even most of the time?
* I don\\\'t get why everyone thinks you either have to hate the Wii and love Yahtzee or love the Wii and hate Yahtzee. I like my Wii (and I\\\'m well aware that he thinks it\\\'s childish and overhyped), and I like Yahtzee\\\'s snark (refreshing compaired to \\\"Oh, this is great\\\" and it turns out not being good). So, why is there such a sharp contrast?
* Uh...you are aware he only has five minutes to get his opinions across right, and can\\\'t spend masses of time elaborating \\\'it\\\'s not a God of War clone exactly but for the sake of maintaining flow I\\\'m not going to call it that and will instead use several seconds to categorise it in brief and move on the main crunch of the review\\\'. See below...you\\\'re taking about three seconds of footage far too seriously. [[hottip:*:This bit seems to have been orphaned off, as it seems to be in reply to something despite not logically following up from anything above.]]
* Why does everyone take this man so seriously? He\\\'s a comedian! He says things that are supposed to be funny! He exaggerates things to make jokes about them! Why do people have to analyze everything he says like it\\\'s a psychological profile? When he says something that seems to be in opposition to something he said in an earlier review, it\\\'s not representative of some particular deep(er)-seated loathing for this week\\\'s game- it\\\'s just hyperbole for the sake of humor.
* OK, on the flip side of things regarding the fandom and hatedom. Why must he be \\\"only a joke\\\", or \\\"only a dead serious reviewer\\\"? Why be all black and white about the matter? He\\\'s clearly somewhere in the middle, a decent critic who makes jokes about the games he reviews. He\\\'s given decent reviews about many games he\\\'s done, such as Batman, and several times he\\\'s said that, while the game isn\\\'t great, it certainly isn\\\'t bad either, such as Halo 3 and Uncharted 2.
*What\\\'s with all this Yahtzee-bashing over the most trivial stuff? Has it not occurred to anyone that the guy is \\\'\\\'human,\\\'\\\' and therefore is bound to contradict himself some or even most of the time?
* I don\\\'t get why everyone thinks you either have to hate the Wii and love Yahtzee or love the Wii and hate Yahtzee. I like my Wii (and I\\\'m well aware that he thinks it\\\'s childish and overhyped), and I like Yahtzee\\\'s snark (refreshing compaired to \\\"Oh, this is great\\\" and it turns out not being good). So, why is there such a sharp contrast?
* Uh...you are aware he only has five minutes to get his opinions across right, and can\\\'t spend masses of time elaborating \\\'it\\\'s not a God of War clone exactly but for the sake of maintaining flow I\\\'m not going to call it that and will instead use several seconds to categorise it in brief and move on the main crunch of the review\\\'. See below...you\\\'re taking about three seconds of footage far too seriously. [[hottip:*:This bit seems to have been orphaned off, as it seems to be in reply to something despite not logically following up from anything above.]]
* Why does everyone take this man so seriously? He\\\'s a comedian! He says things that are supposed to be funny! He exaggerates things to make jokes about them! Why do people have to analyze everything he says like it\\\'s a psychological profile? When he says something that seems to be in opposition to something he said in an earlier review, it\\\'s not representative of some particular deep(er)-seated loathing for this week\\\'s game- it\\\'s just hyperbole for the sake of humor.
* OK, on the flip side of things regarding the fandom and hatedom. Why must he be \\\"only a joke\\\", or \\\"only a dead serious reviewer\\\"? Why be all black and white about the matter? He\\\'s clearly somewhere in the middle, a decent critic who makes jokes about the games he reviews. He\\\'s given decent reviews about many games he\\\'s done, such as Batman, and several times he\\\'s said that, while the game isn\\\'t great, it certainly isn\\\'t bad either, such as Halo 3 and Uncharted 2.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
* What bugs me is that people who reference his works to make some kind of point apparently only heard the parts that support their argument and everything else is just \
to:
* What bugs me is that people who reference his works to make some kind of point apparently only heard the parts that support their argument and everything else is just \\\"Blah blah blah shit blah blah blah fuck blah blah blah swear.\\\"
*What\\\'s with all this Yahtzee-bashing over the most trivial stuff? Has it not occurred to anyone that the guy is \\\'\\\'human,\\\'\\\' and therefore is bound to contradict himself some or even most of the time?
* I don\\\'t get why everyone thinks you either have to hate the Wii and love Yahtzee or love the Wii and hate Yahtzee. I like my Wii (and I\\\'m well aware that he thinks it\\\'s childish and overhyped), and I like Yahtzee\\\'s snark (refreshing compaired to \\\"Oh, this is great\\\" and it turns out not being good). So, why is there such a sharp contrast?
* Uh...you are aware he only has five minutes to get his opinions across right, and can\\\'t spend masses of time elaborating \\\'it\\\'s not a God of War clone exactly but for the sake of maintaining flow I\\\'m not going to call it that and will instead use several seconds to categorise it in brief and move on the main crunch of the review\\\'. See below...you\\\'re taking about three seconds of footage far too seriously. [[hottip:*:This bit seems to have been orphaned off from somewhere, as it seems to be in reply to somewhere]]
* Why does everyone take this man so seriously? He\\\'s a comedian! He says things that are supposed to be funny! He exaggerates things to make jokes about them! Why do people have to analyze everything he says like it\\\'s a psychological profile? When he says something that seems to be in opposition to something he said in an earlier review, it\\\'s not representative of some particular deep(er)-seated loathing for this week\\\'s game- it\\\'s just hyperbole for the sake of humor.
* OK, on the flip side of things regarding the fandom and hatedom. Why must he be \\\"only a joke\\\", or \\\"only a dead serious reviewer\\\"? Why be all black and white about the matter? He\\\'s clearly somewhere in the middle, a decent critic who makes jokes about the games he reviews. He\\\'s given decent reviews about many games he\\\'s done, such as Batman, and several times he\\\'s said that, while the game isn\\\'t great, it certainly isn\\\'t bad either, such as Halo 3 and Uncharted 2.
*What\\\'s with all this Yahtzee-bashing over the most trivial stuff? Has it not occurred to anyone that the guy is \\\'\\\'human,\\\'\\\' and therefore is bound to contradict himself some or even most of the time?
* I don\\\'t get why everyone thinks you either have to hate the Wii and love Yahtzee or love the Wii and hate Yahtzee. I like my Wii (and I\\\'m well aware that he thinks it\\\'s childish and overhyped), and I like Yahtzee\\\'s snark (refreshing compaired to \\\"Oh, this is great\\\" and it turns out not being good). So, why is there such a sharp contrast?
* Uh...you are aware he only has five minutes to get his opinions across right, and can\\\'t spend masses of time elaborating \\\'it\\\'s not a God of War clone exactly but for the sake of maintaining flow I\\\'m not going to call it that and will instead use several seconds to categorise it in brief and move on the main crunch of the review\\\'. See below...you\\\'re taking about three seconds of footage far too seriously. [[hottip:*:This bit seems to have been orphaned off from somewhere, as it seems to be in reply to somewhere]]
* Why does everyone take this man so seriously? He\\\'s a comedian! He says things that are supposed to be funny! He exaggerates things to make jokes about them! Why do people have to analyze everything he says like it\\\'s a psychological profile? When he says something that seems to be in opposition to something he said in an earlier review, it\\\'s not representative of some particular deep(er)-seated loathing for this week\\\'s game- it\\\'s just hyperbole for the sake of humor.
* OK, on the flip side of things regarding the fandom and hatedom. Why must he be \\\"only a joke\\\", or \\\"only a dead serious reviewer\\\"? Why be all black and white about the matter? He\\\'s clearly somewhere in the middle, a decent critic who makes jokes about the games he reviews. He\\\'s given decent reviews about many games he\\\'s done, such as Batman, and several times he\\\'s said that, while the game isn\\\'t great, it certainly isn\\\'t bad either, such as Halo 3 and Uncharted 2.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
* What bugs me is that people who reference his works to make some kind of point apparently only heard the parts that support their argument and everything else is just \
to:
* What bugs me is that people who reference his works to make some kind of point apparently only heard the parts that support their argument and everything else is just \\\"Blah blah blah shit blah blah blah fuck blah blah blah swear.\\\"
*What\\\'s with all this Yahtzee-bashing over the most trivial stuff? Has it not occurred to anyone that the guy is \\\'\\\'human,\\\'\\\' and therefore is bound to contradict himself some or even most of the time?
* I don\\\'t get why everyone thinks you either have to hate the Wii and love Yahtzee or love the Wii and hate Yahtzee. I like my Wii (and I\\\'m well aware that he thinks it\\\'s childish and overhyped), and I like Yahtzee\\\'s snark (refreshing compaired to \\\"Oh, this is great\\\" and it turns out not being good). So, why is there such a sharp contrast?
* Uh...you are aware he only has five minutes to get his opinions across right, and can\\\'t spend masses of time elaborating \\\'it\\\'s not a God of War clone exactly but for the sake of maintaining flow I\\\'m not going to call it that and will instead use several seconds to categorise it in brief and move on the main crunch of the review\\\'. See below...you\\\'re taking about three seconds of footage far too seriously.
* Why does everyone take this man so seriously? He\\\'s a comedian! He says things that are supposed to be funny! He exaggerates things to make jokes about them! Why do people have to analyze everything he says like it\\\'s a psychological profile? When he says something that seems to be in opposition to something he said in an earlier review, it\\\'s not representative of some particular deep(er)-seated loathing for this week\\\'s game- it\\\'s just hyperbole for the sake of humor.
* OK, on the flip side of things regarding the fandom and hatedom. Why must he be \\\"only a joke\\\", or \\\"only a dead serious reviewer\\\"? Why be all black and white about the matter? He\\\'s clearly somewhere in the middle, a decent critic who makes jokes about the games he reviews. He\\\'s given decent reviews about many games he\\\'s done, such as Batman, and several times he\\\'s said that, while the game isn\\\'t great, it certainly isn\\\'t bad either, such as Halo 3 and Uncharted 2.
*What\\\'s with all this Yahtzee-bashing over the most trivial stuff? Has it not occurred to anyone that the guy is \\\'\\\'human,\\\'\\\' and therefore is bound to contradict himself some or even most of the time?
* I don\\\'t get why everyone thinks you either have to hate the Wii and love Yahtzee or love the Wii and hate Yahtzee. I like my Wii (and I\\\'m well aware that he thinks it\\\'s childish and overhyped), and I like Yahtzee\\\'s snark (refreshing compaired to \\\"Oh, this is great\\\" and it turns out not being good). So, why is there such a sharp contrast?
* Uh...you are aware he only has five minutes to get his opinions across right, and can\\\'t spend masses of time elaborating \\\'it\\\'s not a God of War clone exactly but for the sake of maintaining flow I\\\'m not going to call it that and will instead use several seconds to categorise it in brief and move on the main crunch of the review\\\'. See below...you\\\'re taking about three seconds of footage far too seriously.
* Why does everyone take this man so seriously? He\\\'s a comedian! He says things that are supposed to be funny! He exaggerates things to make jokes about them! Why do people have to analyze everything he says like it\\\'s a psychological profile? When he says something that seems to be in opposition to something he said in an earlier review, it\\\'s not representative of some particular deep(er)-seated loathing for this week\\\'s game- it\\\'s just hyperbole for the sake of humor.
* OK, on the flip side of things regarding the fandom and hatedom. Why must he be \\\"only a joke\\\", or \\\"only a dead serious reviewer\\\"? Why be all black and white about the matter? He\\\'s clearly somewhere in the middle, a decent critic who makes jokes about the games he reviews. He\\\'s given decent reviews about many games he\\\'s done, such as Batman, and several times he\\\'s said that, while the game isn\\\'t great, it certainly isn\\\'t bad either, such as Halo 3 and Uncharted 2.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
* What bugs me is that people who reference his works to make some kind of point apparently only heard the parts that support their argument and everything else is just \
to:
* What bugs me is that people who reference his works to make some kind of point apparently only heard the parts that support their argument and everything else is just \\\"Blah blah blah shit blah blah blah fuck blah blah blah swear.\\\"
*What\\\'s with all this Yahtzee-bashing over the most trivial stuff? Has it not occurred to anyone that the guy is \\\'\\\'human,\\\'\\\' and therefore is bound to contradict himself some or even most of the time?
* I don\\\'t get why everyone thinks you either have to hate the Wii and love Yahtzee or love the Wii and hate Yahtzee. I like my Wii (and I\\\'m well aware that he thinks it\\\'s childish and overhyped), and I like Yahtzee\\\'s snark (refreshing compaired to \\\"Oh, this is great\\\" and it turns out not being good). So, why is there such a sharp contrast?
* Uh...you are aware he only has five minutes to get his opinions across right, and can\\\'t spend masses of time elaborating \\\'it\\\'s not a God of War clone exactly but for the sake of maintaining flow I\\\'m not going to call it that and will instead use several seconds to categorise it in brief and move on the main crunch of the review\\\'. See below...you\\\'re taking about three seconds of footage far too seriously.
* OK, on the flip side of things regarding the fandom and hatedom. Why must he be \\\"only a joke\\\", or \\\"only a dead serious reviewer\\\"? Why be all black and white about the matter? He\\\'s clearly somewhere in the middle, a decent critic who makes jokes about the games he reviews. He\\\'s given decent reviews about many games he\\\'s done, such as Batman, and several times he\\\'s said that, while the game isn\\\'t great, it certainly isn\\\'t bad either, such as Halo 3 and Uncharted 2.
*What\\\'s with all this Yahtzee-bashing over the most trivial stuff? Has it not occurred to anyone that the guy is \\\'\\\'human,\\\'\\\' and therefore is bound to contradict himself some or even most of the time?
* I don\\\'t get why everyone thinks you either have to hate the Wii and love Yahtzee or love the Wii and hate Yahtzee. I like my Wii (and I\\\'m well aware that he thinks it\\\'s childish and overhyped), and I like Yahtzee\\\'s snark (refreshing compaired to \\\"Oh, this is great\\\" and it turns out not being good). So, why is there such a sharp contrast?
* Uh...you are aware he only has five minutes to get his opinions across right, and can\\\'t spend masses of time elaborating \\\'it\\\'s not a God of War clone exactly but for the sake of maintaining flow I\\\'m not going to call it that and will instead use several seconds to categorise it in brief and move on the main crunch of the review\\\'. See below...you\\\'re taking about three seconds of footage far too seriously.
* OK, on the flip side of things regarding the fandom and hatedom. Why must he be \\\"only a joke\\\", or \\\"only a dead serious reviewer\\\"? Why be all black and white about the matter? He\\\'s clearly somewhere in the middle, a decent critic who makes jokes about the games he reviews. He\\\'s given decent reviews about many games he\\\'s done, such as Batman, and several times he\\\'s said that, while the game isn\\\'t great, it certainly isn\\\'t bad either, such as Halo 3 and Uncharted 2.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
* What bugs me is that people who reference his works to make some kind of point apparently only heard the parts that support their argument and everything else is just \
to:
* What bugs me is that people who reference his works to make some kind of point apparently only heard the parts that support their argument and everything else is just \\\"Blah blah blah shit blah blah blah fuck blah blah blah swear.\\\"
*What\\\'s with all this Yahtzee-bashing over the most trivial stuff? Has it not occurred to anyone that the guy is \\\'\\\'human,\\\'\\\' and therefore is bound to contradict himself some or even most of the time?
* I don\\\'t get why everyone thinks you either have to hate the Wii and love Yahtzee or love the Wii and hate Yahtzee. I like my Wii (and I\\\'m well aware that he thinks it\\\'s childish and overhyped), and I like Yahtzee\\\'s snark (refreshing compaired to \\\"Oh, this is great\\\" and it turns out not being good). So, why is there such a sharp contrast?
* Uh...you are aware he only has five minutes to get his opinions across right, and can\\\'t spend masses of time elaborating \\\'it\\\'s not a God of War clone exactly but for the sake of maintaining flow I\\\'m not going to call it that and will instead use several seconds to categorise it in brief and move on the main crunch of the review\\\'. See below...you\\\'re taking about three seconds of footage far too seriously.
* OK, on the flip side of things regarding the fandom and hatedom. Why must he be \\\"only a joke\\\", or \\\"only a dead serious reviewer\\\"? Why be all black and white about the matter? He\\\'s clearly somewhere in the middle, a decent critic who makes jokes about the games he reviews. He\\\'s given decent reviews about many games he\\\'s done, such as Batman, and several times he\\\'s said that, while the game isn\\\'t great, it certainly isn\\\'t bad either, such as Halo 3 and Uncharted 2.
* Uh...you are aware he only has five minutes to get his opinions across right, and can\\\'t spend masses of time elaborating \\\'it\\\'s not a God of War clone exactly but for the sake of maintaining flow I\\\'m not going to call it that and will instead use several seconds to categorise it in brief and move on the main crunch of the review\\\'. See below...you\\\'re taking about three seconds of footage far too seriously.
*What\\\'s with all this Yahtzee-bashing over the most trivial stuff? Has it not occurred to anyone that the guy is \\\'\\\'human,\\\'\\\' and therefore is bound to contradict himself some or even most of the time?
* I don\\\'t get why everyone thinks you either have to hate the Wii and love Yahtzee or love the Wii and hate Yahtzee. I like my Wii (and I\\\'m well aware that he thinks it\\\'s childish and overhyped), and I like Yahtzee\\\'s snark (refreshing compaired to \\\"Oh, this is great\\\" and it turns out not being good). So, why is there such a sharp contrast?
* Uh...you are aware he only has five minutes to get his opinions across right, and can\\\'t spend masses of time elaborating \\\'it\\\'s not a God of War clone exactly but for the sake of maintaining flow I\\\'m not going to call it that and will instead use several seconds to categorise it in brief and move on the main crunch of the review\\\'. See below...you\\\'re taking about three seconds of footage far too seriously.
* OK, on the flip side of things regarding the fandom and hatedom. Why must he be \\\"only a joke\\\", or \\\"only a dead serious reviewer\\\"? Why be all black and white about the matter? He\\\'s clearly somewhere in the middle, a decent critic who makes jokes about the games he reviews. He\\\'s given decent reviews about many games he\\\'s done, such as Batman, and several times he\\\'s said that, while the game isn\\\'t great, it certainly isn\\\'t bad either, such as Halo 3 and Uncharted 2.
* Uh...you are aware he only has five minutes to get his opinions across right, and can\\\'t spend masses of time elaborating \\\'it\\\'s not a God of War clone exactly but for the sake of maintaining flow I\\\'m not going to call it that and will instead use several seconds to categorise it in brief and move on the main crunch of the review\\\'. See below...you\\\'re taking about three seconds of footage far too seriously.
