[002]
lrrose
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Shepard get the option of [[spoiler:telling the Catalyst that forcing evolution on the entire galaxy is morally wrong.]] How does that make it a flawless ending. And I have not seen anything that suggests that Bioware actually agrees with [[spoiler:the Catalyst\'s views on the conflict between organics and synthetic.]]
[[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MnoTHbvl2Wg Here]], at about 10:50 is where the flaw in Synthesis is mentioned.
We both agree that this is a case of WriterOnBoard. What we are arguing over is whether the Synthesis ending is presented as being flawless. Which, come to think of it, is little more than semantics.
[[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MnoTHbvl2Wg Here]], at about 10:50 is where the flaw in Synthesis is mentioned.
We both agree that this is a case of WriterOnBoard. What we are arguing over is whether the Synthesis ending is presented as being flawless. Which, come to think of it, is little more than semantics.
to:
Shepard get the option of [[spoiler:telling the Catalyst that forcing evolution on the entire galaxy is morally wrong.]] How does that make it a flawless ending. And I have not seen anything that suggests that Bioware actually agrees with [[spoiler:the Catalyst\\\'s views on the conflict between organics and synthetic.]]
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Shepard get the option of [[spoiler:telling the Catalyst that forcing evolution on the entire galaxy is morally wrong.]] How does that make it a flawless ending. And I have not seen anything that suggests that Bioware actually agrees with [[spoiler:the Catalyst\'s views on the conflict between organics and synthetic.]]
to:
Shepard get the option of [[spoiler:telling the Catalyst that forcing evolution on the entire galaxy is morally wrong.]] How does that make it a flawless ending. And I have not seen anything that suggests that Bioware actually agrees with [[spoiler:the Catalyst\\\'s views on the conflict between organics and synthetic.]]
[[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MnoTHbvl2Wg Here]], at about 10:50 is where the flaw in Synthesis is mentioned.
We both agree that this is a case of WriterOnBoard. What we are arguing over is whether the Synthesis ending is presented as being flawless. Which, come to think of it, is little more than semantics.
[[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MnoTHbvl2Wg Here]], at about 10:50 is where the flaw in Synthesis is mentioned.
We both agree that this is a case of WriterOnBoard. What we are arguing over is whether the Synthesis ending is presented as being flawless. Which, come to think of it, is little more than semantics.
