[006]
Cifyra
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
In ArmA: Armed Assault, it clearly shows that the faction that you fight for are not the good guys. First, a camp in Democratic Republic of Sahrani have South Sahrani refugees hiding from the southern king\'s genocides. Also, in the last mission, South Sahrani forces fire upon you and the US forces. The alleged mass graves that the South Sahrani have dug up were absent when you first fight through the towns, further supporting the theory that it was South Sahrani\'s doing. It was the south Sahranis who reported the alleged massacre, making it very possible it was a false flag operation to blame the north for their crimes. Foxtrot-1, your player character, explicitly said he had to hide the truth from his superiors in order to quickly end the war. In the promotional fictional blog written by a soldier from the conflict, his word that those South Sahrani troops who fire upon them were Northern troops could reasonably be biased, and/or a coverup after the US government pressured the South into co-operation. Not to mention the fact that in the ending, the news report shows that the north Sahranis who were \
to:
In ArmA: Armed Assault, it clearly shows that the faction that you fight for are not the good guys. First, a camp in Democratic Republic of Sahrani have South Sahrani refugees hiding from the southern king\\\'s genocides. They were literally begging you to not report them to the South Sahrani King for fear of their lives. Also, in the last mission, South Sahrani forces fire upon you and the US forces. The alleged mass graves that the South Sahrani have dug up were absent when you first fight through the towns, further supporting the theory that it was South Sahrani\\\'s doing. It was the south Sahranis who reported the alleged massacre, making it very possible it was a false flag operation to blame the north for their crimes. Foxtrot-1, your player character, explicitly said he had to hide the truth from his superiors in order to quickly end the war. In the promotional fictional blog written by a soldier from the conflict, his word that those South Sahrani troops who fire upon them were Northern troops could reasonably be biased, and/or a coverup after the US government pressured the South into co-operation. Not to mention the fact that in the ending, the news report shows that the north Sahranis who were \\\"liberated\\\" were devastated. All of these facts combined qualifies it for several tropes such as,
BlackAndGreyMorality,
DownerEnding,
FalseFlagOperation,
VillainProtagonist,
HeroAntagonist,
TheBadGuyWins, and many more.
BlackAndGreyMorality,
DownerEnding,
FalseFlagOperation,
VillainProtagonist,
HeroAntagonist,
TheBadGuyWins, and many more.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
In ArmA: Armed Assault, it clearly shows that the faction that you fight for are not the good guys. First, a camp in Democratic Republic of Sahrani have South Sahrani refugees hiding from the southern king\'s genocides. Also, in the last mission, South Sahrani forces fire upon you and the US forces. The alleged mass graves that the South Sahrani have dug up were absent when you first fight through the towns, further supporting the theory that it was South Sahrani\'s doing. It was the south Sahranis who reported the alleged massacre, making it very possible it was a false flag operation to blame the north for their crimes. Foxtrot-1, your player character, explicitly said he had to hide the truth from his superiors in order to quickly end the war. In the promotional fictional blog written by a soldier from the conflict, his word that those South Sahrani troops who fire upon them were Northern troops could reasonably be biased, and/or a coverup after the US government pressured the South into co-operation. Not to mention the fact that in the ending, the news report shows that the north Sahranis who were \
to:
In ArmA: Armed Assault, it clearly shows that the faction that you fight for are not the good guys. First, a camp in Democratic Republic of Sahrani have South Sahrani refugees hiding from the southern king\\\'s genocides. Also, in the last mission, South Sahrani forces fire upon you and the US forces. The alleged mass graves that the South Sahrani have dug up were absent when you first fight through the towns, further supporting the theory that it was South Sahrani\\\'s doing. It was the south Sahranis who reported the alleged massacre, making it very possible it was a false flag operation to blame the north for their crimes. Foxtrot-1, your player character, explicitly said he had to hide the truth from his superiors in order to quickly end the war. In the promotional fictional blog written by a soldier from the conflict, his word that those South Sahrani troops who fire upon them were Northern troops could reasonably be biased, and/or a coverup after the US government pressured the South into co-operation. Not to mention the fact that in the ending, the news report shows that the north Sahranis who were \\\"liberated\\\" were devastated. All of these facts combined qualifies it for several tropes such as,
BlackAndGreyMorality,
DownerEnding,
FalseFlagOperation,
VillainProtagonist,
HeroAntagonist,
TheBadGuyWins, and many more.
BlackAndGreyMorality,
DownerEnding,
FalseFlagOperation,
VillainProtagonist,
HeroAntagonist,
TheBadGuyWins, and many more.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
In ArmA: Armed Assault, it clearly shows that the faction that you fight for are not the good guys. First, a camp in Democratic Republic of Sahrani have South Sahrani refugees hiding from the southern king\'s genocides. Also, in the last mission, South Sahrani forces fire upon you and the US forces. The alleged mass graves that the South Sahrani have dug up were absent when you first fight through the towns, further supporting the theory that it was South Sahrani\'s doing. It was the south Sahranis who reported the alleged massacre, making it very possible it was a false flag operation to blame the north for their crimes. Foxtrot-1, your player character, explicitly said he had to hide the truth from his superiors in order to quickly end the war. In the promotional fictional blog written by a soldier from the conflict, his word that those South Sahrani troops who fire upon them were Northern troops could reasonably be biased, and/or a coverup after the US government pressured the South into co-operation. Not to mention the fact that in the ending, the news report shows that the north Sahranis who were \
to:
In ArmA: Armed Assault, it clearly shows that the faction that you fight for are not the good guys. First, a camp in Democratic Republic of Sahrani have South Sahrani refugees hiding from the southern king\\\'s genocides. Also, in the last mission, South Sahrani forces fire upon you and the US forces. The alleged mass graves that the South Sahrani have dug up were absent when you first fight through the towns, further supporting the theory that it was South Sahrani\\\'s doing. It was the south Sahranis who reported the alleged massacre, making it very possible it was a false flag operation to blame the north for their crimes. Foxtrot-1, your player character, explicitly said he had to hide the truth from his superiors in order to quickly end the war. In the promotional fictional blog written by a soldier from the conflict, his word that those South Sahrani troops who fire upon them were Northern troops could reasonably be biased, and/or a coverup after the US government pressured the South into co-operation. Not to mention the fact that in the ending, the news report shows that the north Sahranis who were \\\"liberated\\\" were devastated. All of these facts combined qualifies it for several tropes such as,
BlackAndGreyMorality,
DownerEnding,
FalseFlagOperation,
VillanProtagonist,
HeroAntagonist,
TheBadGuyWins, and many more.
BlackAndGreyMorality,
DownerEnding,
FalseFlagOperation,
VillanProtagonist,
HeroAntagonist,
TheBadGuyWins, and many more.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
In ArmA: Armed Assault, it clearly shows that the faction that you fight for are not the good guys. First, a camp in Democratic Republic of Sahrani have South Sahrani refugees hiding from the southern king\'s genocides. Also, in the last mission, South Sahrani forces fire upon you and the US forces. The alleged mass graves that the South Sahrani have dug up were absent when you first fight through the towns, further supporting the theory that it was South Sahrani\'s doing. It was the south Sahranis who reported the alleged massacre, making it very possible it was a false flag operation to blame the north for their crimes. Foxtrot-1, your player character, explicitly said he had to hide the truth from his superiors in order to quickly end the war. In the promotional fictional blog written by a soldier from the conflict, his word that those South Sahrani troops who fire upon them were Northern troops could reasonably be biased, and/or a coverup after the US government pressured the South into co-operation. Not to mention the fact that in the ending, the news report shows that the north Sahranis who were \
to:
In ArmA: Armed Assault, it clearly shows that the faction that you fight for are not the good guys. First, a camp in Democratic Republic of Sahrani have South Sahrani refugees hiding from the southern king\\\'s genocides. Also, in the last mission, South Sahrani forces fire upon you and the US forces. The alleged mass graves that the South Sahrani have dug up were absent when you first fight through the towns, further supporting the theory that it was South Sahrani\\\'s doing. It was the south Sahranis who reported the alleged massacre, making it very possible it was a false flag operation to blame the north for their crimes. Foxtrot-1, your player character, explicitly said he had to hide the truth from his superiors in order to quickly end the war. In the promotional fictional blog written by a soldier from the conflict, his word that those South Sahrani troops who fire upon them were Northern troops could reasonably be biased, and/or a coverup after the US government pressured the South into co-operation. Not to mention the fact that in the ending, the news report shows that the north Sahranis who were \\\"liberated\\\" were devastated. All of these facts combined qualifies it for several tropes such as,
BlackAndGreyMorality,
DownerEnding,
FalseFlagOperation,
VillianProtagonist,
HeroAntagonist,
TheBadGuyWins, and many more.
BlackAndGreyMorality,
DownerEnding,
FalseFlagOperation,
VillianProtagonist,
HeroAntagonist,
TheBadGuyWins, and many more.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
In ArmA: Armed Assault, it clearly shows that the faction that you fight for are not the good guys. First, a camp in Democratic Republic of Sahrani have South Sahrani refugees hiding from the southern king\'s genocides. Also, in the last mission, South Sahrani forces fire upon you and the US forces. The alleged mass graves that the South Sahrani have dug up were absent when you first fight through the towns, further supporting the theory that it was South Sahrani\'s doing. It was the south Sahranis who reported the alleged massacre, making it very possible it was a false flag operation to blame the north for their crimes. Foxtrot-1, your player character, explicitly said he had to hide the truth from his superiors in order to quickly end the war. In the promotional fictional blog written by a soldier from the conflict, his word that those South Sahrani troops who fire upon them were Northern troops could reasonably be biased, and/or a coverup after the US government pressured the South into co-operation. Not to mention the fact that in the ending, the news report shows that the north Sahranis who were \
to:
In ArmA: Armed Assault, it clearly shows that the faction that you fight for are not the good guys. First, a camp in Democratic Republic of Sahrani have South Sahrani refugees hiding from the southern king\\\'s genocides. Also, in the last mission, South Sahrani forces fire upon you and the US forces. The alleged mass graves that the South Sahrani have dug up were absent when you first fight through the towns, further supporting the theory that it was South Sahrani\\\'s doing. It was the south Sahranis who reported the alleged massacre, making it very possible it was a false flag operation to blame the north for their crimes. Foxtrot-1, your player character, explicitly said he had to hide the truth from his superiors in order to quickly end the war. In the promotional fictional blog written by a soldier from the conflict, his word that those South Sahrani troops who fire upon them were Northern troops could reasonably be biased, and/or a coverup after the US government pressured the South into co-operation. Not to mention the fact that in the ending, the news report shows that the north Sahranis who were \\\"liberated\\\" were devastated. All of these facts combined qualifies it for several tropes such as,
BlackAndGreyMorality,
DownerEnding,
FalseFlagOperation,
VillianProtagonist,
HeroAntagonist,
TheBadGuyWins,
and many more.
BlackAndGreyMorality,
DownerEnding,
FalseFlagOperation,
VillianProtagonist,
HeroAntagonist,
TheBadGuyWins,
and many more.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Oh hello, troll post remnants below. -_-
Anyway, I think someone can have a JerkassRealization and then go back to being {{Jerkass}} afterwards. The description of JerkassRealization doesn\'t preclude a return to {{Jerkass}}. Marten\'s words make it very clear that she was being unfair to him, and she realizes this and apologizes. The following incident is irrelevant to the previous realization.
Anyway, I think someone can have a JerkassRealization and then go back to being {{Jerkass}} afterwards. The description of JerkassRealization doesn\'t preclude a return to {{Jerkass}}. Marten\'s words make it very clear that she was being unfair to him, and she realizes this and apologizes. The following incident is irrelevant to the previous realization.
to:
I think someone can have a JerkassRealization and then go back to being {{Jerkass}} afterwards. The description of JerkassRealization doesn\\\'t preclude a return to {{Jerkass}}. Marten\\\'s words make it very clear that she was being unfair to him, and she realizes this and apologizes. The following incident is irrelevant to the previous realization.
