[004]
Wyldchyld
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
The original intent of the Inu Yasha entry was to make an entry that limited the subjectiveness as much as possible which is why not all incidents from the manga were put in. I had been hoping it could remain entirely in that spirit and an EditWar over the additions of entirely interpretational incidents that had been deliberately left out (on those grounds) is not something I would like to get involved in. I will leave the example alone, as it currently stands and will not be revisiting or editing this any further. However, please can further edits to add new information be avoided? The example is comprehensive enough as it stands. It doesn\'t matter if not everything in the manga is covered.
to:
The original intent of the Inu Yasha entry was to make an entry that limited the subjectiveness as much as possible which is why not all incidents from the manga were put in. This was in the interest of posting something that would not trigger a ship war.
I had been hoping it could remain entirely in that spirit and an EditWar over the additions of entirely interpretational incidents that had been deliberately left out (on those grounds) is not something I would like to get involved in.
As a result, I will leave the example as it currently stands and will not be revisiting or editing this any further. Please can further edits be avoided if all it\\\'s for is to squash further examples or expand on examples already given? The entry is comprehensive enough as it stands. It doesn\\\'t matter if not everything in the manga has been included.
I had been hoping it could remain entirely in that spirit and an EditWar over the additions of entirely interpretational incidents that had been deliberately left out (on those grounds) is not something I would like to get involved in.
As a result, I will leave the example as it currently stands and will not be revisiting or editing this any further. Please can further edits be avoided if all it\\\'s for is to squash further examples or expand on examples already given? The entry is comprehensive enough as it stands. It doesn\\\'t matter if not everything in the manga has been included.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Please could the Inu Yasha example not be constantly edited. It was a giant, comprehensive example to begin with and did a good job in that original format of covering the manga in a neutral manner, sticking to events that limited subjective interpretation.
The only incidents left out were ones that were completely subjective in interpreting why they occurred. Constantly editing the example to squash in these subjective incidents only makes this example look like it\'s being turned into a victim of ShipToShipCombat and ends up making the example unnecessarily long and rambling.
Please can this stop before it gets out of hand?
The only incidents left out were ones that were completely subjective in interpreting why they occurred. Constantly editing the example to squash in these subjective incidents only makes this example look like it\'s being turned into a victim of ShipToShipCombat and ends up making the example unnecessarily long and rambling.
Please can this stop before it gets out of hand?
to:
The original intent of the Inu Yasha entry was to make an entry that limited the subjectiveness as much as possible which is why not all incidents from the manga were put in. I had been hoping it could remain entirely in that spirit and an EditWar over the additions of entirely interpretational incidents that had been deliberately left out (on those grounds) is not something I would like to get involved in. I will leave the example alone, as it currently stands and will not be revisiting or editing this any further. However, please can further edits to add new information be avoided? The example is comprehensive enough as it stands. It doesn\\\'t matter if not everything in the manga is covered.
Changed line(s) 4 from:
n
to:
Please can this stop before it gets out of hand?
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
The only incidents left out were ones that were completely subjective in interpreting why they occurred. Constantly editing the example to add in these subjective incidents only makes this example look like it\'s being turned into a victim of ShipToShipCombat.
There is absolutely no need to keep squashing more information into the example, especially when the only information left are incidents that are left to subjective interpretation as the why they occurred.
There is absolutely no need to keep squashing more information into the example, especially when the only information left are incidents that are left to subjective interpretation as the why they occurred.
to:
The only incidents left out were ones that were completely subjective in interpreting why they occurred. Constantly editing the example to squash in these subjective incidents only makes this example look like it\\\'s being turned into a victim of ShipToShipCombat and ends up making the example unnecessarily long and rambling.
