[003]
Jessewq
Current Version
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
1. For SpinOffspring, I don\'t think it\'s right calling Littlepip a \
to:
1. For SpinOffspring, I don\\\'t think it\\\'s right calling Littlepip a \\\"distant descendant\\\" of Applejack anymore than calling Velvet Remedy one. They\\\'re both in the Apple family, but WordOfGod states that neither are direct descendants of Applejack. In order to get from Littlepip to Applejack, you would have to go up above Applejack in the family tree an unknown amount and then come down again, which seems like way too much of a stretch to fall under that trope.
2. Similarly, I\\\'m not sure LukeIAmYourFather should be present at all. The strongest connection is that Littlepip and Velvet Remedy share a common Apple ancestor six generations back. [=SteelHooves\\\'s=] only known connection with the Apple family is via mating with Applejack, so you get back to the same situation as in (1) above when linking him with Littlepip and Velvet Remedy, only with an additional in-law at the end.
Do you think these reasons are enough to modify (1) and remove (2)?
2. Similarly, I\\\'m not sure LukeIAmYourFather should be present at all. The strongest connection is that Littlepip and Velvet Remedy share a common Apple ancestor six generations back. [=SteelHooves\\\'s=] only known connection with the Apple family is via mating with Applejack, so you get back to the same situation as in (1) above when linking him with Littlepip and Velvet Remedy, only with an additional in-law at the end.
Do you think these reasons are enough to modify (1) and remove (2)?
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
1. For SpinOffspring, I don\'t think it\'s right calling Littlepip a \
to:
1. For SpinOffspring, I don\\\'t think it\\\'s right calling Littlepip a \\\"distant descendant\\\" of Applejack anymore than calling Velvet Remedy one. They\\\'re both in the Apple family, but WordOfGod states that neither are direct descendants of Applejack. In order to get from Littlepip to Applejack, you would have to go up above Applejack in the family tree an unknown amount and then come down again, which seems like way too much of a stretch to fall under that trope.
2. Similarly, I\\\'m not sure LukeIAmYourFather should be present at all. The strongest connection is that Littlepip and Velvet Remedy share a common Apple ancestor six generations back. [=SteelHooves\\\'s=] only known connection with the Apple was via mating with Applejack, so you get back to the same situation as in (1) above when linking him with Littlepip and Velvet Remedy, only with an additional in-law at the end.
Do you think these reasons are enough to modify (1) and remove (2)?
2. Similarly, I\\\'m not sure LukeIAmYourFather should be present at all. The strongest connection is that Littlepip and Velvet Remedy share a common Apple ancestor six generations back. [=SteelHooves\\\'s=] only known connection with the Apple was via mating with Applejack, so you get back to the same situation as in (1) above when linking him with Littlepip and Velvet Remedy, only with an additional in-law at the end.
Do you think these reasons are enough to modify (1) and remove (2)?
Changed line(s) 2 from:
n
1. For SpinOffspring, I don\'t think it\'s right calling Littlepip a \
to:
1. For SpinOffspring, I don\\\'t think it\\\'s right calling Littlepip a \\\"distant descendant\\\" of Applejack anymore than calling Velvet Remedy one. They\\\'re both in the Apple family, but WordOfGod states that neither are direct descendants of Applejack. In order to get from Littlepip to Applejack, you would have to go up above Applejack in the family tree an unknown amount and then come down again, which seems like way too much of a stretch to fall under that trope.
2. Similarly, I\\\'m not sure LukeIAmYourFather should be present at all. The strongest connection is that Littlepip and Velvet Remedy share a common Apple ancestor six generations back. SteelHooves\\\'s only known connection with the Apple was via mating with Applejack, so you get back to the same situation as in (1) above when linking him with Littlepip and Velvet Remedy, only with an additional in-law at the end.
Do you think these reasons are enough to modify (1) and remove (2)?
