[003]
PersonaTroper
Current Version
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
ccoa, on the consensus thing: The others on this thread stepped out of this discussion after I responded. Neither of us can say whether they changed their minds on it or if they went neutral. Counting their \
to:
ccoa, on the consensus thing: The others on this thread stepped out of this discussion after I responded. Neither of us can say whether they changed their minds on it or if they went neutral. Counting their \\\"votes\\\" is disingenuous when we can\\\'t speak for them and this isn\\\'t even a voting process. It\\\'s a discoursive process.
MetaFour, Madrugada, maybe it would be better if we can find a mod who has played Persona 4, since the nature of the scene and game play heavily into this discussion. The reason it becomes MisaimedFandom is because the {{Anvilicious}} overriding theme/moral of the game is that you should see past deceit, avoid the easy answers, and keep on searching for the truth. It\\\'s not just AnAesop: the entire game, start to finish, is completely centered around this. This scene becomes an application of that theme to test whether the audience truly gets it or not. People who misinterpret this scene have not only misinterpreted the scene in particular - they have also failed to learn the lesson of the game. And testing the audience like this is perfectly in line with the game.
MetaFour, Madrugada, maybe it would be better if we can find a mod who has played Persona 4, since the nature of the scene and game play heavily into this discussion. The reason it becomes MisaimedFandom is because the {{Anvilicious}} overriding theme/moral of the game is that you should see past deceit, avoid the easy answers, and keep on searching for the truth. It\\\'s not just AnAesop: the entire game, start to finish, is completely centered around this. This scene becomes an application of that theme to test whether the audience truly gets it or not. People who misinterpret this scene have not only misinterpreted the scene in particular - they have also failed to learn the lesson of the game. And testing the audience like this is perfectly in line with the game.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
ccoa, on the consensus thing: The others on this thread stepped out of this discussion after I responded. Neither of us can say whether they changed their minds on it or if they went neutral. Counting their \
to:
ccoa, on the consensus thing: The others on this thread stepped out of this discussion after I responded. Neither of us can say whether they changed their minds on it or if they went neutral. Counting their \\\"votes\\\" is disingenuous when we can\\\'t speak for them and this isn\\\'t even a voting process. It\\\'s a discoursive process.
MetaFour, Madrugada, maybe it would be better if we can find a mod who has played Persona 4, since the nature of the scene and game play heavily into this discussion. The reason it becomes MisaimedFandom is because the {{Anvilicious}} overriding theme/moral of the game is that you should see past deceit, avoid the easy answers, and keep on searching for the truth. It\\\'s not just AnAesop: the entire game, start to finish, is completely centered around this. This scene becomes an application of that theme to test whether the audience truly gets it or not. People who misinterpret this scene have not only misinterpreted the scene in particular - they have also failed to learn the lesson of the game. And providing a subtle test like this is perfectly in line with the game.
MetaFour, Madrugada, maybe it would be better if we can find a mod who has played Persona 4, since the nature of the scene and game play heavily into this discussion. The reason it becomes MisaimedFandom is because the {{Anvilicious}} overriding theme/moral of the game is that you should see past deceit, avoid the easy answers, and keep on searching for the truth. It\\\'s not just AnAesop: the entire game, start to finish, is completely centered around this. This scene becomes an application of that theme to test whether the audience truly gets it or not. People who misinterpret this scene have not only misinterpreted the scene in particular - they have also failed to learn the lesson of the game. And providing a subtle test like this is perfectly in line with the game.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
ccoa, on the consensus thing: The others on this thread stepped out of this discussion after I responded. Neither of us can say whether they changed their minds on it or if they went neutral. Counting their \
to:
ccoa, on the consensus thing: The others on this thread stepped out of this discussion after I responded. Neither of us can say whether they changed their minds on it or if they went neutral. Counting their \\\"votes\\\" is disingenuous when we can\\\'t speak for them and this isn\\\'t even a voting process. It\\\'s a discoursive process.
MetaFour, Madrugada, maybe it would be better if we can find a mod who has played Persona 4, since the nature of the scene and game play heavily into this discussion. The reason it becomes MisaimedFandom is because the {{Anvilicious}} overriding theme/moral of the game is that you should see past deceit, avoid the easy answers, and keep on searching for the truth. It\\\'s not just AnAesop: the entire game, start to finish, is completely centered around this. This scene becomes an application of that theme to test whether the audience truly gets it or not. People who misinterpret this scene have not only misinterpreted the scene in particular - they have also failed to learn the lesson of the game. Providing a subtle test like this is perfectly in line with the game.
MetaFour, Madrugada, maybe it would be better if we can find a mod who has played Persona 4, since the nature of the scene and game play heavily into this discussion. The reason it becomes MisaimedFandom is because the {{Anvilicious}} overriding theme/moral of the game is that you should see past deceit, avoid the easy answers, and keep on searching for the truth. It\\\'s not just AnAesop: the entire game, start to finish, is completely centered around this. This scene becomes an application of that theme to test whether the audience truly gets it or not. People who misinterpret this scene have not only misinterpreted the scene in particular - they have also failed to learn the lesson of the game. Providing a subtle test like this is perfectly in line with the game.
