Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
MisaimedFandom is when the audience\'s reaction to the work is \'\'unintended by the author.\'\' You have no evidence that what reaction was intended by the author. Short of a WordOfGod, I\'m not sure there\'s any way to resolve how that scene was \
to:
MisaimedFandom is when the audience\\\'s reaction to the work is \\\'\\\'unintended by the author.\\\'\\\' You have no evidence that what reaction was intended by the author. Short of a WordOfGod, I\\\'m not sure there\\\'s any way to resolve how that scene was \\\"meant\\\" to be received, even assuming there was an intended reaction at all. Your interpretation of the scene has been called into question, not only here, but by other members of the fandom \\\'\\\'by your own admission.\\\'\\\' It\\\'s essentially your opinion on the scene versus theirs. No matter how much you believe your interpretation is correct, you have no way to prove this.
The entry is wrong. It is long and full of justifications and word cruft, an automatic flag for a bad entry. It uses first person (which, despite our informal tone, is \\\'\\\'not allowed\\\'\\\' on the main wiki). It misuses a trope. It better belongs on WMG or Just Bugs Me, plain and simple.
The entry is wrong. It is long and full of justifications and word cruft, an automatic flag for a bad entry. It uses first person (which, despite our informal tone, is \\\'\\\'not allowed\\\'\\\' on the main wiki). It misuses a trope. It better belongs on WMG or Just Bugs Me, plain and simple.
[001]
ccoa
MOD
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
MisaimedFandom is when the audience\'s reaction to the work is \'\'unintended by the author.\'\' You have no evidence that what reaction was intended by the author. Short of a WordOfGod, I\'m not sure there\'s any way to resolve how that scene was \
to:
MisaimedFandom is when the audience\\\'s reaction to the work is \\\'\\\'unintended by the author.\\\'\\\' You have no evidence that what reaction was intended by the author. Short of a WordOfGod, I\\\'m not sure there\\\'s any way to resolve how that scene was \\\"meant\\\" to be received, even assuming there was an intended reaction at all. Your interpretation of the scene has been called into question, not only here, but by other members of the fandom \\\'\\\'by your own admission.\\\'\\\' It\\\'s essentially your opinion on the scene versus theirs. No matter how much you believe your interpretation is correct, you have no way to prove this.
The entry is wrong. It is long and full of justifications and word cruft, an automatic flag for a bad entry. It uses first person (which, despite our formal tone, is \\\'\\\'not allowed\\\'\\\' on the main wiki). It misuses a trope. It better belongs on WMG or Just Bugs Me, plain and simple.
The entry is wrong. It is long and full of justifications and word cruft, an automatic flag for a bad entry. It uses first person (which, despite our formal tone, is \\\'\\\'not allowed\\\'\\\' on the main wiki). It misuses a trope. It better belongs on WMG or Just Bugs Me, plain and simple.
