[002]
antialiasis
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
The Pokémon example section has some legitimate examples, but also several that are simply baseless conjecture obviously sprouting from confirmation bias. Can I just remove all those and add a notice that there needs to be actual, physical evidence that it\'s cheating, not just subjective experience making you feel like \
to:
The Pokémon example section has some legitimate examples, but also several that are simply baseless conjecture obviously sprouting from confirmation bias. Can I just remove all those and add a notice that there needs to be actual, physical evidence that it\\\'s cheating, not just subjective experience making you feel like \\\"I always miss and the AI never does!!!!\\\"? (Personally, being a glass-half-full kind of person, my subjective experience is that I always hit and the opponents always miss or hurt themselves in confusion when it\\\'s most convenient for me, but I know that this is not actually something programmed into the game.)
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
The Pokémon example section has some legitimate examples, but also several that are simply baseless conjecture obviously sprouting from confirmation bias. Can I just remove all those and add a notice that there needs to be actual, physical evidence that it\'s cheating, not just subjective experience making you feel like \
to:
The Pokémon example section has some legitimate examples, but also several that are simply baseless conjecture obviously sprouting from confirmation bias. Can I just remove all those and add a notice that there needs to be actual, physical evidence that it\\\'s cheating, not just subjective experience making you feel like \\\"I always miss and the AI never does!!!!\\\"?
