[006]
Tannhaeuser
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I don\'t think this should be cut. It\'s a valid trope, though perhaps something of a DeadHorseTrope now. It could use a little re-writing, perhaps, and I don\'t quite remember seeing it go through YKTTW, but I have seen quite a few \
to:
I don\\\'t think this should be cut. It\\\'s a valid trope, though perhaps something of a DeadHorseTrope now. It could use a little re-writing, perhaps, and I don\\\'t quite remember seeing it go through YKTTW, but I have seen quite a few \\\"tropes\\\" not nearly so worthy as this posted on this wiki. It\\\'s like Charlie Brown\\\'s Christmas Tree; it just needs a little love.
Um, some more examples might be Una from \\\'\\\'TheFaerieQueene\\\'\\\', Alisande from \\\'\\\'AConnecticutYankeeInKingArthursCourt\\\'\\\' (check that one, haven\\\'t read the book in a while), and Yvonne from PGWodehouse\\\'s \\\"Sir Agravaine.\\\"
Um, some more examples might be Una from \\\'\\\'TheFaerieQueene\\\'\\\', Alisande from \\\'\\\'AConnecticutYankeeInKingArthursCourt\\\'\\\' (check that one, haven\\\'t read the book in a while), and Yvonne from PGWodehouse\\\'s \\\"Sir Agravaine.\\\"
Changed line(s) 8 from:
n
Oh, BTW, when you launch a page, make sure that each example\'s individual page links back to to the new page. When you launched this, the only page it had in its related to was your own troper page. Thats not enough for WikiMagic to occur.
to:
Oh, BTW, when you launch a page, make sure that each example\\\'s individual page links back to to the new page. When you launched this, the only page it had in its related to was your own troper page and DontLookBack. Thats not enough for WikiMagic to occur.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
The DungeonsAndDragons page is for all editions, not just the current one
to:
The DungeonsAndDragons page is for all editions, not just the current one
Oh, BTW, when you launch a page, make sure that each example\\\'s individual page links back to to the new page. When you launched this, the only page it had in its related to was your own troper page. Thats not enough for WikiMagic to occur.
Oh, BTW, when you launch a page, make sure that each example\\\'s individual page links back to to the new page. When you launched this, the only page it had in its related to was your own troper page. Thats not enough for WikiMagic to occur.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Even if the 4th edition medusa is different, it\'s still a dungeons and dragons creature. Look at ChainedByFashion - it\'s a chain devil. They look different in 4th ed, but it still links to D&D. Or look at BlackMagic. Its from the 3.0 Book of vile darkness. Still links to DungeonsAndDragons despite being 2 editions out of date. Then theres SnakePeople with a Marilith from 4th ed. StandardSciFiFleet links to StarWars, SpaceStation links to DeepSpaceNine. I don\'t get why you are so deathly opposed to what is by far the standard practice around the wiki - images link to their work - it\'s standard practice.
to:
Even if the 4th edition medusa is different, it\\\'s still a dungeons and dragons creature. Look at ChainedByFashion - it\\\'s a chain devil. They look different in 4th ed, but it still links to D&D. Or look at BlackMagic. Its from the 3.0 Book of vile darkness. Still links to DungeonsAndDragons despite being 2 editions out of date. Then theres SnakePeople with a Marilith from 4th ed. StandardSciFiFleet links to StarWars, SpaceStation links to DeepSpaceNine, SpiderTank links to SupremeCommander, ActionGirl links to TombRaider, BadassLongcoat links to TheDarkTower... I don\\\'t get why you are so deathly opposed to what is by far the standard practice around the wiki - images link to their work - it\\\'s standard practice.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Even if the 4th edition medusa is different, it\'s still a dungeons and dragons creature. Look at ChainedByFashion - it\'s a chain devil. They look different in 4th ed, but it still links to D&D. Or look at BlackMagic. Its from the 3.0 Book of vile darkness. Still links to DungeonsAndDragons despite being 2 editions out of date. Then theres SnakePeople with a Marilith from 4th ed.
to:
Even if the 4th edition medusa is different, it\\\'s still a dungeons and dragons creature. Look at ChainedByFashion - it\\\'s a chain devil. They look different in 4th ed, but it still links to D&D. Or look at BlackMagic. Its from the 3.0 Book of vile darkness. Still links to DungeonsAndDragons despite being 2 editions out of date. Then theres SnakePeople with a Marilith from 4th ed. StandardSciFiFleet links to StarWars, SpaceStation links to DeepSpaceNine. I don\\\'t get why you are so deathly opposed to what is by far the standard practice around the wiki - images link to their work - it\\\'s standard practice.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Even if the 4th edition medusa is different, it\'s still a dungeons and dragons creature. Look at ChainedByFsshion - it\'s a chain devil. They look different in 4th ed, but it still links to D&D. Or look at BlackMagic. Its from the 3.0 Book of vile darkness. Still links to DungeonsAndDragons despite being 2 editions out of date
to:
Even if the 4th edition medusa is different, it\\\'s still a dungeons and dragons creature. Look at ChainedByFashion - it\\\'s a chain devil. They look different in 4th ed, but it still links to D&D. Or look at BlackMagic. Its from the 3.0 Book of vile darkness. Still links to DungeonsAndDragons despite being 2 editions out of date. Then theres SnakePeople with a Marilith from 4th ed.
Changed line(s) 2 from:
to:
Also, generally, images should be right justified because it displays better, but whatever
