[001]
DarkChirano
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I have to greatly disagree on Bobby’s broken base being removed simply because some people like him. Even before and during release, people were split on him being generic. As of late, I’ve seen other people across the net see the cracks in his characterization and the agenda behind him more and more. So to deny the Broken Base behind him is dishonest. There’s no valid reason either both tropes can’t be on the page, or even Base-Breaking Character as a compromise.
to:
I have to greatly disagree on Bobby’s Broken Base being removed simply because another trope is there.
That doesn’t even make a single lick of sense. Half the purpose for this wiki is singular subjects being able to have more than one trope associated with them. Even before and during release, people were split on him being generic. As of late, I’ve seen other people across the net see the cracks in his characterization and the agenda behind him more and more. So to outright deny and/ or downplay the Broken Base mileage varying behind him is dishonest. And by this logic, I should have deleted the Ensemble Darkhorse trope.
There’s no valid, legitimate reason either both tropes can’t be on the page, or even Base-Breaking Character alone as a compromise.
That doesn’t even make a single lick of sense. Half the purpose for this wiki is singular subjects being able to have more than one trope associated with them. Even before and during release, people were split on him being generic. As of late, I’ve seen other people across the net see the cracks in his characterization and the agenda behind him more and more. So to outright deny and/ or downplay the Broken Base mileage varying behind him is dishonest. And by this logic, I should have deleted the Ensemble Darkhorse trope.
There’s no valid, legitimate reason either both tropes can’t be on the page, or even Base-Breaking Character alone as a compromise.
