Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion History Characters / RWBYRemnant

Go To

Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I respect that some natter on headscratchers pages is unavoidable, but it\'s sort of annoying when people go through and shoot down valid headscratchers. \
to:
I respect that some natter on headscratchers pages is unavoidable, but it\\\'s sort of annoying when people go through and shoot down valid headscratchers. \\\"Well, actually\\\" and \\\"if you think about it..\\\", this rubs me the same way as people who don\\\'t realize [[TropesAreTools Tropes Are Not Bad]] - and neither are headscratchers bad.

Some natter is fine, but when people go down the page and take apart each headscratcher suggested it\\\'s a little annoying to me. Not declaring war on it, just saying.

(Same goes for people going down obviously ridiculous and JustForFun WildMassGuessing entries and list \\\"Jossed\\\" on it as if it were a serious fan theory. For example, people can WMG about WesternAnimation/BluesClues and Film/StarWars sharing the same universe, but no one is SERIOUSLY expecing it to be a plot twist on either of the shows.)
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I respect that some natter on headscratchers pages is unavoidable, but it\'s sort of annoying when people go through and shoot down valid headscratchers. \
to:
I respect that some natter on headscratchers pages is unavoidable, but it\\\'s sort of annoying when people go through and shoot down valid headscratchers. \\\"Well, actually\\\" and \\\"if you think about it..\\\", this rubs me the same way as people who don\\\'t realize [[TropesAreTools Tropes Are Not Bad]] - and neither are headscratchers bad.

Some natter is fine, but when people go down the page and take apart each headscratcher suggested it\\\'s a little annoying. (Same goes for people going down obviously ridiculous and JustForFun WildMassGuessing entries and list \\\"Jossed\\\" on it as if it were a serious fan theory. For example, people can WMG about WesternAnimation/BluesClues and Film/StarWars sharing the same universe, but no one is expecing it to be a plot twist on either of the shows.)
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I respect that some natter on headscratchers pages is unavoidable, but it\'s sort of annoying when people go through and shoot down valid headscratchers. \
to:
I respect that some natter on headscratchers pages is unavoidable, but it\\\'s sort of annoying when people go through and shoot down valid headscratchers. \\\"Well, actually\\\" and \\\"if you think about it..\\\", this rubs me the same way as people who don\\\'t realize [[TropesAreTools Tropes Are Not Bad]] - and neither are headscratchers bad.

Some natter is fine, but when people go down the page and take apart each headscratcher suggested it\\\'s a little annoying. (Same goes for people going down obviously ridiculous and JustForFun WildMassGuessing entries and list \\\"Jossed\\\" on it as if it were a serious fan theory. For example, people can WMG about Series/BluesClues and Film/StarWars sharing the same universe, but no one is expecing it to be a plot twist on either of the shows.)
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I respect that some natter on headscratchers pages is unavoidable, but it\'s sort of annoying when people go through and shoot down valid headscratchers. \
to:
I respect that some natter on headscratchers pages is unavoidable, but it\\\'s sort of annoying when people go through and shoot down valid headscratchers. \\\"Well, actually\\\" and \\\"if you think about it..\\\", this rubs me the same way as people who don\\\'t realize [[TropesAreTools Tropes Are Not Bad]] - and neither are headscratchers bad.

Some natter is fine, but when people go down the page and take apart each headscratcher suggested it\\\'s a little annoying. (Same goes for people going down obviously ridiculous and JustForFun WildMassGuessing entries and list \\\"Jossed\\\" on it as if it were a serious fan theory.)
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I respect that some natter on headscratchers pages is unavoidable, but it\'s sort of annoying when people go through and shoot down valid headscratchers. \
to:
I respect that some natter on headscratchers pages is unavoidable, but it\\\'s sort of annoying when people go through and shoot down valid headscratchers. \\\"Well, actually\\\" and \\\"if you think about it..\\\", this rubs me the same way as people who don\\\'t realize [[TropesAreTools Tropes Are Not Bad]] - and neither are headscratchers bad.

Some natter is fine, but when people go down the page and take apart each headscratcher suggested it\\\'s a little annoying. (Same goes for people going down obviously ridiculous and JustforFun WildMassGuessing entries and list \\\"Jossed\\\" on it as if it were a serious fan theory.)
Top