[004]
TwistedWanderland
Current Version
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
The wiki doesn’t speculate. As I said before, it gives a detailed description of a character’s history and abilities, specific objects and terminology, and the plot of the story. The official site only gives a basic summary of the plot and characters, neither of which are likely to be updated unless we get a new season set after a time skip. The wiki is compiled of what’s seen in a series and other official material that’s usually cited down below the page, with anything false added being removed within the same day. You can believe what you want about the wiki, but you’re personal gripes with it have little to no bearing on its validity, especially with how you keep saying it speculates without even giving an example of how it does so.
to:
The wiki doesn’t speculate. As I said before, it gives a detailed description of a character’s history and abilities, specific objects and terminology, and the plot of the story. The official site only gives a basic summary of the plot and characters, neither of which are likely to be updated unless we get a new season set after a time skip. The wiki is compiled of what’s seen in a series and other official material that’s usually cited down below the page, with anything false added usually being removed within the same day. You can believe what you want about the wiki, but you’re personal gripes with it have little to no bearing on its validity, especially with how you keep saying it speculates without even giving an example of how it does so.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
A false statement would be saying the wiki isn’t a viable source simply because it’s a “fan-run” site. That’s a common misconception that doesn’t hold a lot of weight with how much information and protection levels most wikis have, since that’s usually where most fans will first go to check out a particular series.
to:
A false statement would be saying the wiki isn’t a viable source simply because it’s a “fan-run” site. That’s a common misconception that doesn’t hold a lot of weight with how much information and protection levels most wikis have, especially since that’s usually where most fans will first go to look up a particular series.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
A false statement would be saying the wiki isn’t a viable source simply because it’s a “fan-run” site. That’s a common misconception that doesn’t hold a lot of weight with how much information and protection levels most wikis have, especially since that’s usually where most fans will first go to check out a particular series.
to:
A false statement would be saying the wiki isn’t a viable source simply because it’s a “fan-run” site. That’s a common misconception that doesn’t hold a lot of weight with how much information and protection levels most wikis have, since that’s usually where most fans will first go to check out a particular series.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Is VideoGame/TraumaTeam a FranchiseKiller of the \'\'Trauma Center\'\' franchise? Unlike many other suspects, \'\'Trauma Team\'\' wasn\'t a bad game in the slightest, but was so niche overall and sold so little (due to releasing on the Wii in 2010, the year that was probably the apex in Wii games being relegated as \
to:
Is VideoGame/TraumaTeam a FranchiseKiller of the \\\'\\\'Trauma Center\\\'\\\' franchise? Unlike many other suspects, \\\'\\\'Trauma Team\\\'\\\' wasn\\\'t a bad game in the slightest, but was so niche overall and sold so little (due to releasing on the Wii in 2010, the year that was probably the apex in Wii games being relegated as \\\"casual trash\\\" due to the glut of UsefulNotes/{{Shovelware}} that was released then) that we haven\\\'t seen a game be released from it for over \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'ten years\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\' now, as the devs either didn\\\'t think the series was worth the investment or the devs themselves lost passion for the overall project.
What do you think?
What do you think?
