[005]
Akamia
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
About the \'\'[=BattleMaster=]\'\' as it appeared in \'\'[=MechWarrior 2=]\'\'; did the game actually label it the \
to:
About the \\\'\\\'[=BattleMaster=]\\\'\\\' as it appeared in \\\'\\\'[=MechWarrior 2=]\\\'\\\'; did the game actually label it the \\\"[=BattleMaster=] IIC\\\"? Like, do we have screenshot evidence of it? Because I remembered it that way myself, but I can\\\'t find any source verifying it even as an apocryphal design. There \\\'\\\'was\\\'\\\' a \\\'\\\'[=BattleMaster=] IIC\\\'\\\' fanon design in the [=MekTek=] release of \\\'\\\'4: Mercenaries\\\'\\\', but other than that... I\\\'m pretty sure the [=MW2=] version was just an ordinary \\\'\\\'[=BattleMaster=]\\\'\\\' using Clan-spec weapons and equipment because that\\\'s all that particular game had. It and the \\\'\\\'Tarantula\\\'\\\' were the only Inner Sphere \\\'Mechs in the base versions of [=MW2=]. All the other \\\'Mechs were of course Clan designs, and even the Kell Hounds were using them, at least some of which were probably stand-ins for the IS versions of the \\\'Mechs where applicable.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
About the \'\'[=BattleMaster=]\'\' as it appeared in \'\'[=MechWarrior 2=]\'\'; did the game actually label it the \
to:
About the \\\'\\\'[=BattleMaster=]\\\'\\\' as it appeared in \\\'\\\'[=MechWarrior 2=]\\\'\\\'; did the game actually label it the \\\"[=BattleMaster=] IIC\\\"? Like, do we have screenshot evidence of it? Because I remembered it that way myself, but I can\\\'t find any source verifying it even as an apocryphal design. There \\\'\\\'was\\\'\\\' a \\\'\\\'[=BattleMaster=] IIC\\\'\\\' fanon design in the [=MekTek=] release of \\\'\\\'4: Mercenaries\\\'\\\', but other than that... I\\\'m pretty sure the [=MW2=] version was just an ordinary \\\'\\\'[=BattleMaster=]\\\'\\\' using Clan-spec weapons and equipment because that\\\'s all that particular game had. It and the \\\'\\\'Tarantula\\\'\\\' were the only Inner Sphere \\\'Mechs in the base versions of [=MW2=].
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
About the \'\'[=BattleMaster=]\'\' as it appeared in \'\'[=MechWarrior 2=]\'\'; did the game actually label it the \
to:
About the \\\'\\\'[=BattleMaster=]\\\'\\\' as it appeared in \\\'\\\'[=MechWarrior 2=]\\\'\\\'; did the game actually label it the \\\"[=BattleMaster=] IIC\\\"? Like, do we have screenshot evidence of it? Because I remembered it that way myself, but I can\\\'t find any source verifying it even as an apocryphal design. There \\\'\\\'was\\\'\\\' a \\\'\\\'[=BattleMaster=] IIC\\\'\\\' fanon design in the [=MekTek=] release of \\\'\\\'4: Mercenaries\\\'\\\', but other than that... I\\\'m pretty sure the [=MW2=] version was just an ordinary \\\'\\\'[=BattleMaster=]\\\'\\\' using Clan-spec weapons and equipment because that\\\'s all that particular game had.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
The Homeland example veers into editorialisation, no?
to:
Some of these entries seem to veer into editorializing.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
The Homeland example is editorialisation, to say the least. Some may consider it TinfoilHat material.
to:
The Homeland example veers into editorialisation, no?
