Discussion History GameBreaker / FireEmblemHeroes

I’m not the boss and I don’t have the answers: I simply came here to point out that this is a fascist screed and talking about fascist screeds in evasive-yet-glowing terms is a real bad look, at all times but especially right now. The page and many of the trope examples on other pages, as they stand, should go; what happens next is open to discussion. For my own two cents, I say again that our treatment of stuff like Mein Kamph, Protocols, and the Turner Diaries provides a clear template for how to talk about fascist books without buying into their bullshit; so we can absolutely have a Victoria article, it should just be redone from the ground up. TV Tropes Wiki is meant to be as comprehensive as possible, and if even one person has had such a book recommended to them by that one creepy acquaintance, or even read it and been left unsure how they feel, and they come here to a site they love and are persuaded to reject its evil ideas by some witty and insightful criticism, that’s worth something.

I’m not the boss and I don’t have the answers: I simply came here to point out that this is a fascist screed and talking about fascist screeds in evasive-yet-glowing terms is a real bad look, at all times but especially right now. The page and many of the trope examples on other pages, as they stand, should go; what happens next is open to discussion. For my own two cents, I say again that our treatment of stuff like Mein Kamph, Protocols, and the Turner Diaries provides a clear template for how to talk about fascist books without buying into their bullshit; so we can absolutely have a Victoria article, it should just be redone from the ground up. TV Tropes Wiki is meant to be as comprehensive as possible, and if even one person has had such a book recommended to them by that acquaintance, or even read it and been left unsure how they feel, and they come here to a site they love and are persuaded to reject its evil ideas by some witty and insightful criticism, that’s worth something.

trio: compared to other duos? probably not. compared to all units? probably. i dont see why duos have their own page - besides one building in AR, there are the same as any other unit.

caeda: leaning toward no. busted looking prf, but doesn\'t have the statline to fully utilize it. multiple categories of units (all mages, all staves, all beasts, all dragons) that she cannot vantage against over 75% hp. any mage worth anything is going to be initiating with 75+ atk, let\'s be real here. has a functional 66 atk with a full vantage kit with an atk boon, which doesn\'t cut it for a melee vantage unit (she isn\'t kronya). i see another altina, sort of - pve cheeser vs less invested units who have already been powercrept.

merric: maybe. slaying is good for mages, good prfs, typical glassy offensive statline. while windsweep shennanigans are cool, is it really something we would want that much these days? b slot is getting more and more valuable. even still, he can run something else. he can freely stack spd and with ss2 seal and time\'s pulse, he can hit ~80-85 damage with his special. issue is his bulk. he is going to get one-shotted by almost any relevant, equally invested unit. bulk in the sixties is nothing these days, and he has both def and res in the danger zone.

trio: maybe, probably not.

merric: maybe. slaying is good for mages, solid prf special, typical glassy offensive statline. my main issue with him is while windsweep shennanigans are cool, is it really something we would want that much these days? b slot is getting more and more valuable.