[005]
BoltDMC
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
No problem with the earlier troper\'s deletion of the recommendation for \
to:
No problem with the earlier troper\\\'s deletion of the recommendation for \\\"Penny\\\'s New Same Life.\\\" Have read the story, and it\\\'s horrible -- and the reasons the recommender likes it seem at best OC fanboy-weird eccentric and at worst outright trolling. Like the deleting troper, am suspecting the latter issue.
UPDATE: Note well that since adding this discussion post, the work has been posted at AO3 by the contributing reviewer. They claim it\\\'s by \\\"their friend Skauldrich,\\\" but may in fact be written by CanzetYote (when I reported the repost to the author at the Fur Affinity website, the message went unanswered) -- if so, this may be a self-recommendation, which isn\\\'t allowed.
FURTHER UPDATE: The story has been reposted at FFN with CanzetYote credited as the author (Skauldrich is listed in the text as “credit goes to”). This strongly suggests they are the author of the fic and self-recommended it. Removal of the review was thus the correct action.
UPDATE: Note well that since adding this discussion post, the work has been posted at AO3 by the contributing reviewer. They claim it\\\'s by \\\"their friend Skauldrich,\\\" but may in fact be written by CanzetYote (when I reported the repost to the author at the Fur Affinity website, the message went unanswered) -- if so, this may be a self-recommendation, which isn\\\'t allowed.
FURTHER UPDATE: The story has been reposted at FFN with CanzetYote credited as the author (Skauldrich is listed in the text as “credit goes to”). This strongly suggests they are the author of the fic and self-recommended it. Removal of the review was thus the correct action.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
No problem with the earlier troper\'s deletion of the recommendation for \
to:
No problem with the earlier troper\\\'s deletion of the recommendation for \\\"Penny\\\'s New Same Life.\\\" Have read the story, and it\\\'s horrible -- and the reasons the recommender likes it seem at best OC fanboy-weird eccentric and at worst outright trolling. Like the deleting troper, am suspecting the latter issue.
UPDATE: Note well that since adding this discussion post, the work has been posted at AO3 by the contributing reviewer. They claim it\\\'s by \\\"their friend Skauldrich,\\\" but may in fact be written by CanzetYote (when I reported the repost to the author at the Fur Affinity website, the message went unanswered) -- if so, this may be a self-recommendation, which isn\\\'t allowed.
FURTHER UPDATE: The story has been reposted at FFN with CanzetYote credited as the author (Skauldrich is listed in the text as “credit goes to”). This strongly suggests they are the author of the fic and self-recommended it. Removal of the review was thus the correct action,
UPDATE: Note well that since adding this discussion post, the work has been posted at AO3 by the contributing reviewer. They claim it\\\'s by \\\"their friend Skauldrich,\\\" but may in fact be written by CanzetYote (when I reported the repost to the author at the Fur Affinity website, the message went unanswered) -- if so, this may be a self-recommendation, which isn\\\'t allowed.
FURTHER UPDATE: The story has been reposted at FFN with CanzetYote credited as the author (Skauldrich is listed in the text as “credit goes to”). This strongly suggests they are the author of the fic and self-recommended it. Removal of the review was thus the correct action,
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
No problem with the earlier troper\'s deletion of the recommendation for \
to:
No problem with the earlier troper\\\'s deletion of the recommendation for \\\"Penny\\\'s New Same Life.\\\" Have read the story, and it\\\'s horrible -- and the reasons the recommender likes it seem at best OC fanboy-weird eccentric and at worst outright trolling. Like the deleting troper, am suspecting the latter issue.
UPDATE: Note well that since adding this discussion post, the work has been posted at AO3 by the contributing reviewer. They claim it\\\'s by \\\"their friend Skauldrich,\\\" but may in fact be written by CanzetYote (when I reported the repost to the author at the Fur Affinity website, the message went unanswered) -- if so, this may be a self-recommendation, which isn\\\'t allowed.
UPDATE: Note well that since adding this discussion post, the work has been posted at AO3 by the contributing reviewer. They claim it\\\'s by \\\"their friend Skauldrich,\\\" but may in fact be written by CanzetYote (when I reported the repost to the author at the Fur Affinity website, the message went unanswered) -- if so, this may be a self-recommendation, which isn\\\'t allowed.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
No problem with the earlier troper\'s deletion of the recommendation for \
to:
No problem with the earlier troper\\\'s deletion of the recommendation for \\\"Penny\\\'s New Same Life.\\\" Have read the story, and it\\\'s horrible -- and the reasons the recommender likes it seem at best OC fanboy-weird eccentric and at worst outright trolling. Like the deleting troper, am suspecting the latter issue.
UPDATE: Note well that since adding this discussion post, the work has been posted at AO3 by the contributing reviewer. They claim it\\\'s by \\\"their friend Skauldrich,\\\" but may in fact be written by CanzetYote (when I reported the repost to the author at the Fur Affinity website, the message went unanswered) -- thus this may be a self-recommendation, which isn\\\'t allowed.
UPDATE: Note well that since adding this discussion post, the work has been posted at AO3 by the contributing reviewer. They claim it\\\'s by \\\"their friend Skauldrich,\\\" but may in fact be written by CanzetYote (when I reported the repost to the author at the Fur Affinity website, the message went unanswered) -- thus this may be a self-recommendation, which isn\\\'t allowed.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Agreed with the earlier troper\'s deletion of the recommendation for \
to:
No problem with the earlier troper\\\'s deletion of the recommendation for \\\"Penny\\\'s New Same Life.\\\" Have read the story, and it\\\'s horrible -- and the reasons the recommender likes it seem at best OC fanboy-weird eccentric and at worst outright trolling. Like the deleting troper, am suspecting the latter issue.
