Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion History Characters / PokemonProtagonistsAndRivals

Go To

[004] ChrisX Current Version
Changed line(s) 8 from:
n
* \'\'\'Obsessed With My Brother\'\'\': An almost retired archetype and mostly a personality one, much like a Catria. Amongst your team, there\'s sometimes a character, usually female, who is... a \'\'wee bit\'\' too obsessed with her brother (mostly older ones). They had such a big affection that it might make you or others feel a bit eye-rolling when you look at them. Sometimes they may even express about [[BrotherSisterIncest wanting to marry their bro!]] Whenever they get into a support, there\'s a big chance that this character will compare their support partner with their bro. And if there is paired ending, they may even get one! The thing is, this character actually had their own depths that might not be linked with their brothers, but sometimes, their bro-con seemed to shine way too much...
to:
* \\\'\\\'\\\'Obsessed With My Brother\\\'\\\'\\\': An almost retired archetype and mostly a personality one, much like a Catria. Amongst your team, there\\\'s sometimes a character, usually female, who is... a \\\'\\\'wee bit\\\'\\\' too obsessed with her brother (mostly older ones). They had such a big affection that it might make you or others feel a bit eye-rolling when you look at them. Sometimes they may even express about [[BrotherSisterIncest wanting to marry their bro!]] Whenever they get into a support, there\\\'s a big chance that this character will compare their support partner with their bro. And if there is paired ending, they may even get one! The thing is, this character actually had their own depths that might not be linked with their brothers, but sometimes, their bro-con seemed to shine way too much... When people tend to say that \\\'incest is part of the series storytelling\\\', you can see that these people are most likely the source.
Changed line(s) 4 from:
n
As it is the evidence points to them being the same with no evidence to argue against it. You seem to in the very minority that disputes this. You forever whatever reason, seem to want to make a argument, where there is none to be had.
to:
As it is, the evidence points to them being the same with no evidence to argue against it. You seem to in the very minority that disputes this. You forever whatever reason, seem to want to make a argument, where there is none to be had.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
bwburke94 your speculation is based off a toy, so you have no room to accuse anyone of of speculation. The only other bit of evidence you gave is a WordOfGod, that argues against your case.
to:
bwburke94 your argument is based off a toy, so you have no room to accuse anyone of of speculation. The only other bit of evidence you gave is a WordOfGod, that argues against your case.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
bwburke94 your speculation is vase off a toy, so you have no room to accuse anyone of of speculation. The only other bit of evidence you gave is a WordOfGod, that argues against your case.
to:
bwburke94 your speculation is based off a toy, so you have no room to accuse anyone of of speculation. The only other bit of evidence you gave is a WordOfGod, that argues against your case.
Top