[003]
DarthEnderX
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
[[I asked about on the forum too and they said they should be separate because \
to:
[[I asked about on the forum too and they said they should be separate because \\\"He mixes elements from both Evil Ryu and Oni gameplay-wise, meaning he has distinct differences from Evil Ryu even if he also has similarities.]]
If gameplay differences made him a different character than almost every character in SF5 would have to be a separate character from who they were previously.
[[But yeah, I don\\\'t see any reason that Oni and Akuma should have a separate entry and Evil Ryu/Kage shouldn\\\'t. The \\\"drastic change in design and personality\\\" doesn\\\'t convince me either, because Oni is just \\\"Akuma but moreso\\\".]]
That\\\'s not an apt comparison. Oni is not to Akuma what Kage is to Evil Ryu. Oni is to Akuma what Kage/Evil Ryu is to Ryu. Oni and Akuma have separate entries because Evil Ryu and Ryu have separate entries.
But Kage is not \\\"Evilier Evil Ryu\\\". He\\\'s JUST Evil Ryu with a new name.
If gameplay differences made him a different character than almost every character in SF5 would have to be a separate character from who they were previously.
[[But yeah, I don\\\'t see any reason that Oni and Akuma should have a separate entry and Evil Ryu/Kage shouldn\\\'t. The \\\"drastic change in design and personality\\\" doesn\\\'t convince me either, because Oni is just \\\"Akuma but moreso\\\".]]
That\\\'s not an apt comparison. Oni is not to Akuma what Kage is to Evil Ryu. Oni is to Akuma what Kage/Evil Ryu is to Ryu. Oni and Akuma have separate entries because Evil Ryu and Ryu have separate entries.
But Kage is not \\\"Evilier Evil Ryu\\\". He\\\'s JUST Evil Ryu with a new name.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
\
to:
[[I asked about on the forum too and they said they should be separate because \\\"He mixes elements from both Evil Ryu and Oni gameplay-wise, meaning he has distinct differences from Evil Ryu even if he also has similarities.]]
If gameplay differences made him a different character than almost every character in SF5 would have to be a separate character from who they were previously.
[[But yeah, I don\\\'t see any reason that Oni and Akuma should have a separate entry and Evil Ryu/Kage shouldn\\\'t. The \\\"drastic change in design and personality\\\" doesn\\\'t convince me either, because Oni is just \\\"Akuma but moreso\\\".]]
That\\\'s not an apt comparison. Oni is not to Akuma what Kage is to Evil Ryu. Oni is to Akuma what Kage/Evil Ryu is to Ryu. Oni and Akuma have separate entries because Evil Ryu and Ryu have separate entries.
But Kaga is not \\\"Evilier Evil Ryu\\\". He\\\'s JUST Evil Ryu with a new name.
If gameplay differences made him a different character than almost every character in SF5 would have to be a separate character from who they were previously.
[[But yeah, I don\\\'t see any reason that Oni and Akuma should have a separate entry and Evil Ryu/Kage shouldn\\\'t. The \\\"drastic change in design and personality\\\" doesn\\\'t convince me either, because Oni is just \\\"Akuma but moreso\\\".]]
That\\\'s not an apt comparison. Oni is not to Akuma what Kage is to Evil Ryu. Oni is to Akuma what Kage/Evil Ryu is to Ryu. Oni and Akuma have separate entries because Evil Ryu and Ryu have separate entries.
But Kaga is not \\\"Evilier Evil Ryu\\\". He\\\'s JUST Evil Ryu with a new name.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
\
to:
\\\"I asked about on the forum too and they said they should be separate because \\\"He mixes elements from both Evil Ryu and Oni gameplay-wise, meaning he has distinct differences from Evil Ryu even if he also has similarities.\\\"
If gameplay differences made him a different character than almost every character in SF5 would have to be a separate character from who they were previously.
\\\"But yeah, I don\\\'t see any reason that Oni and Akuma should have a separate entry and Evil Ryu/Kage shouldn\\\'t. The \\\"drastic change in design and personality\\\" doesn\\\'t convince me either, because Oni is just \\\"Akuma but moreso\\\".\\\"
That\\\'s not an apt comparison. Oni is not to Akuma what Kage is to Evil Ryu. Oni is to Akuma what Kage/Evil Ryu is to Ryu. Oni and Akuma have separate entries because Evil Ryu and Ryu have separate entries.
But Kaga is not \\\"Evilier Evil Ryu\\\". He\\\'s JUST Evil Ryu with a new name.
If gameplay differences made him a different character than almost every character in SF5 would have to be a separate character from who they were previously.
\\\"But yeah, I don\\\'t see any reason that Oni and Akuma should have a separate entry and Evil Ryu/Kage shouldn\\\'t. The \\\"drastic change in design and personality\\\" doesn\\\'t convince me either, because Oni is just \\\"Akuma but moreso\\\".\\\"
That\\\'s not an apt comparison. Oni is not to Akuma what Kage is to Evil Ryu. Oni is to Akuma what Kage/Evil Ryu is to Ryu. Oni and Akuma have separate entries because Evil Ryu and Ryu have separate entries.
But Kaga is not \\\"Evilier Evil Ryu\\\". He\\\'s JUST Evil Ryu with a new name.
