[001]
jamespolk
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I don't think the page is too complain-y. It is after all a list by a highly regarded critic. It is the same thing as the UsefulNotes/GoldenRaspberriesAward, the only difference is that it was a list compiled by one person. Like I said in my first post, this is a good index and I'd be against any attempt to cut it.
to:
I don\'t think the page is too complain-y. It is after all a list by a highly regarded critic. It is the same thing as the UsefulNotes/GoldenRaspberryAward, the only difference is that it was a list compiled by one person. Like I said in my first post, this is a good index and I\'d be against any attempt to cut it.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
The reason I removed the additional reviews was, as I noted above, that they are not on Ebert's list. And if we put just any thumbs-down Ebert review up here, the list could get really long, and there's no way to draw a line as to what should and shouldn't be on here.
to:
The reason I removed the additional reviews was, as I noted above, that they are not on Ebert\'s list. And if we put just any thumbs-down Ebert review up here, the list could get really long, and there\'s no way to draw a line as to what should and shouldn\'t be on here.
