[002]
MAI742
Current Version
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
1.
to:
1. \"The one (disputable) point of view\" of the article?
2. The \"criticisms that are just as simplified and cliched as the fanboi point of view\"?
3. The \"one particular book on rommel\" that most of the article is a summary of?
4. The peer-reviewed cultural historians who allege that Rommel is not popularly thought of as being highly competent and honourable?
If you would like to set aside some time to exchange articles, and presumably drafts, in a dedicated session then a time between eight and twenty hours\' from now would be best for me. Only one of the university libraries in my city has a strategic studies faculty, so there is a good chance that I will be unable to check or scan physical books for you. However, our article access is very good so if you could privilege those in your response then we should have enough to work with.
EDIT: We are fortunate in having a historian who specialises in cultural \'memory\' of the \'\'Nazizeit\'\', so if you\'d prefer a later sit-down session (next Sunday at the same times works for me) or a correspondence then I could literally walk into his office on Tuesday/Wednesday and ask him what we should be looking at.
2. The \"criticisms that are just as simplified and cliched as the fanboi point of view\"?
3. The \"one particular book on rommel\" that most of the article is a summary of?
4. The peer-reviewed cultural historians who allege that Rommel is not popularly thought of as being highly competent and honourable?
If you would like to set aside some time to exchange articles, and presumably drafts, in a dedicated session then a time between eight and twenty hours\' from now would be best for me. Only one of the university libraries in my city has a strategic studies faculty, so there is a good chance that I will be unable to check or scan physical books for you. However, our article access is very good so if you could privilege those in your response then we should have enough to work with.
EDIT: We are fortunate in having a historian who specialises in cultural \'memory\' of the \'\'Nazizeit\'\', so if you\'d prefer a later sit-down session (next Sunday at the same times works for me) or a correspondence then I could literally walk into his office on Tuesday/Wednesday and ask him what we should be looking at.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
1.
to:
1. \"The one (disputable) point of view\" of the article?
2. The \"criticisms that are just as simplified and cliched as the fanboi point of view\"?
3. The \"one particular book on rommel\" that most of the article is a summary of?
4. The peer-reviewed cultural historians who allege that Rommel is not popularly thought of as being highly competent and honourable?
If you would like to set aside some time to exchange articles, and presumably drafts, in a dedicated session then a time between eight and twenty hours\' from now would be best for me. Only one of the university libraries in my city has a strategic studies faculty, so there is a good chance that I will be unable to check or scan physical books for you. However, our article access is very good so if you could privilege those in your response then we should have enough to work with.
2. The \"criticisms that are just as simplified and cliched as the fanboi point of view\"?
3. The \"one particular book on rommel\" that most of the article is a summary of?
4. The peer-reviewed cultural historians who allege that Rommel is not popularly thought of as being highly competent and honourable?
If you would like to set aside some time to exchange articles, and presumably drafts, in a dedicated session then a time between eight and twenty hours\' from now would be best for me. Only one of the university libraries in my city has a strategic studies faculty, so there is a good chance that I will be unable to check or scan physical books for you. However, our article access is very good so if you could privilege those in your response then we should have enough to work with.
