[004]
RedViking
Current Version
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
The reason I deleted the Official Couple entry is because it got a bunch of {{JustifyingEdit}}s beneath it. That should be a huge clue that people disagree with the initial statement. \
to:
The reason I deleted the Official Couple entry is because it got a bunch of {{JustifyingEdit}}s beneath it. That should be a huge clue that people disagree with the initial statement. \\\"The hundreds of tropers\\\" as you put it most likely tolerated the entry not because it was correct, but because they saw (or were the ones who added) those justifying edits.
You make a lot of arguments about who the \\\"main\\\" love interest. Your argument, however, is one-sided in that it doesn\\\'t take the feelings of the main character into account. This is important because, in this instance, the protagonist can choose who his love interest is. Because of that, we really need clarification from Word Of God before we go about declaring who the Official Couple is. Again, \\\"Canon has a crush on the hero so that\\\'s close enough\\\" is not the same thing as Official Couple.
Now, if I am mistaken and Atlus has done so, then feel free to correct me and re-add the entry. But, until then, your description falls under Implied Love Interest.
You make a lot of arguments about who the \\\"main\\\" love interest. Your argument, however, is one-sided in that it doesn\\\'t take the feelings of the main character into account. This is important because, in this instance, the protagonist can choose who his love interest is. Because of that, we really need clarification from Word Of God before we go about declaring who the Official Couple is. Again, \\\"Canon has a crush on the hero so that\\\'s close enough\\\" is not the same thing as Official Couple.
Now, if I am mistaken and Atlus has done so, then feel free to correct me and re-add the entry. But, until then, your description falls under Implied Love Interest.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
The reason I deleted the Official Couple entry is because it got a bunch of JustifyingEdits beneath it. That should be a huge clue that people disagree with the initial statement. \
to:
The reason I deleted the Official Couple entry is because it got a bunch of {{JustifyingEdit}}s beneath it. That should be a huge clue that people disagree with the initial statement. \\\"The hundreds of tropers\\\" as you put it most likely tolerated the entry not because it was correct, but because they saw (or were the ones who added) those justifying edits.
You make a lot of arguments about who the \\\"main\\\" love interest and, to be fair, you have a point there. Your argument, however, is one-sided in that it doesn\\\'t take the feelings of the main character into account. This is important because, in this instance, the protagonist can choose who his love interest is. Because of that, we really need clarification from Word Of God before we go about declaring who the Official Couple is. Again, \\\"Canon has a crush on the hero so that\\\'s close enough\\\" is not the same thing as Official Couple.
Now, if I am mistaken and Atlus has done so, then feel free to correct me and re-add the entry. But, until then, your description falls under Implied Love Interest.
You make a lot of arguments about who the \\\"main\\\" love interest and, to be fair, you have a point there. Your argument, however, is one-sided in that it doesn\\\'t take the feelings of the main character into account. This is important because, in this instance, the protagonist can choose who his love interest is. Because of that, we really need clarification from Word Of God before we go about declaring who the Official Couple is. Again, \\\"Canon has a crush on the hero so that\\\'s close enough\\\" is not the same thing as Official Couple.
Now, if I am mistaken and Atlus has done so, then feel free to correct me and re-add the entry. But, until then, your description falls under Implied Love Interest.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
\
to:
I\\\'m just going to paste what I said under the Persona3 discussion since it\\\'s the same thing:
The reason I deleted the Official Couple entry is because it got a bunch of JustifyingEdits beneath it. That should be a huge clue that people disagree with the initial statement. \\\"The hundreds of tropers\\\" as you put it most likely tolerated the entry not because it was correct, but because they saw (or were the ones who added) those justifying edits.
You make a lot of arguments about who the \\\"main\\\" love interest and, to be fair, you have a point there. Your argument, however, is one-sided in that it doesn\\\'t take the feelings of the main character into account. This is important because, in this instance, the protagonist can choose who his love interest is. Because of that, we really need clarification from Word Of God before we go about declaring who the Official Couple is. Again, \\\"Canon has a crush on the hero so that\\\'s close enough\\\" is not the same thing as Official Couple.
Now, if I am mistaken and Atlus has done so, then feel free to correct me and re-add the entry. But, until then, your description falls under Implied Love Interest.
The reason I deleted the Official Couple entry is because it got a bunch of JustifyingEdits beneath it. That should be a huge clue that people disagree with the initial statement. \\\"The hundreds of tropers\\\" as you put it most likely tolerated the entry not because it was correct, but because they saw (or were the ones who added) those justifying edits.
You make a lot of arguments about who the \\\"main\\\" love interest and, to be fair, you have a point there. Your argument, however, is one-sided in that it doesn\\\'t take the feelings of the main character into account. This is important because, in this instance, the protagonist can choose who his love interest is. Because of that, we really need clarification from Word Of God before we go about declaring who the Official Couple is. Again, \\\"Canon has a crush on the hero so that\\\'s close enough\\\" is not the same thing as Official Couple.
Now, if I am mistaken and Atlus has done so, then feel free to correct me and re-add the entry. But, until then, your description falls under Implied Love Interest.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
We chose to define SpacePlane as a vehicle that can actually achieve orbit. [[http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20070204180416AATFu5g orbital speed is on the order of mach 25.]] The Lynx wouldn\'t cout as a true SpacePlane because it is suborbital. Admittedly, you could build a spacecraft that only went mach 2 until it got 100km or so above the surface and \'\'then\'\' accelerated into orbit, or just travelled straight up at mach 2 until it got so high that orbital speed was slower.
to:
The author chose to define SpacePlane as a vehicle that can actually achieve orbit. [[http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20070204180416AATFu5g Orbital speed is on the order of mach 25.]] The Lynx wouldn\\\'t cout as a true SpacePlane because it is suborbital. Admittedly, you could build a spacecraft that only went mach 2 until it got 100km or so above the surface and \\\'\\\'then\\\'\\\' accelerated into orbit, or just travelled straight up at mach 2 until it got so high that orbital speed was slower.
