Discussion History FanficRecs / Zootopia

If you wanted to make an AU section, then \"Through a Glass, Darkly\" would probably get lumped into that even though it technically also contains the standard universe.

\'\'\'EDIT:\'\'\' Also, the list is getting long enough that we might want to folderize the categories.

\'\'\'2ND EDIT:\'\'\' While the AU category would fit nicely into the current scheme of grouping by subject matter, grouping by content rating or by ongoing vs. complete would cut across that and require either a complicated multi-level categorization system (for example, the general section and shipping sections \'\'both\'\' being subdivided into family-friendly vs. mature, and \'\'those\'\' being subdivided into ongoing and complete), or else require everything be listed 2 or 3 times, once for each categorization scheme.

The AU group could be implemented easily, but the other grouping methods you mentioned would greatly complicate things.

If you wanted to make an AU section, then \"Through a Glass, Darkly\" would probably get lumped into that even though it technically also contains the standard universe.

EDIT: Also, the list is getting long enough that we might want to folderize the categories.

2ND EDIT: While the AU category would fit nicely into the current scheme of grouping by subject matter, grouping by content rating or by ongoing vs. complete would cut across that and require either a complicated multi-level categorization system (for example, the general section and shipping sections \'\'both\'\' being subdivided into family-friendly vs. mature, and \'\'those\'\' being subdivided into ongoing and complete), or else require everything be listed 2 or 3 times, once for each categorization scheme.

The AU group could be implemented easily, but the other grouping methods you mentioned would greatly complicate things.

If you wanted to make an AU section, then \"Through a Glass, Darkly\" would probably get lumped into that even though it technically also contains the standard universe.

EDIT: Also, the list is getting long enough that we might want to folderize the categories.

2ND EDIT: While the AU category would fit nicely into the current scheme of grouping by subject matter, grouping by content rating or by ongoing vs. complete would cut across that and require either a complicated multi-level categorization system (for example, the general section and shipping sections \'\'both\'\' being subdivided into family-friendly vs. mature), or else require everything be listed 2 or 3 times, once for each categorization scheme.

The AU group could be implemented easily, but the other grouping methods you mentioned would greatly complicate things.

If you wanted to make an AU section, then \"Through a Glass, Darkly\" would probably get lumped into that even though it technically also contains the standard universe.

EDIT: Also, the list is getting long enough that we might want to folderize the categories.

2ND EDIT: While the AU category would fit nicely into the current scheme of grouping by subject matter, grouping by content rating or by ongoing vs. complete would cut across that and require either a complicated multi-level categorization system (for example, the general section and shipping sections \'\'both\'\' being subdivided into family-friendly vs. mature), or else require everything be listed 2 or 3 times, once for each categorization scheme.

If you wanted to make an AU section, then \"Through a Glass, Darkly\" would probably get lumped into that even though it technically also contains the standard universe.

EDIT: Also, the list is getting long enough that we might want to folderize the categories.