Follow TV Tropes

Following

A couple aren't really fallacies: You Fail Logic Forever

Go To

shimaspawn from Here and Now Since: May, 2010 Relationship Status: In your bunk
#26: Apr 22nd 2011 at 7:21:01 AM

[up] And how are you supposed to tell which are intentional and which are unintentional without Word of God? The line between the two is very fuzzy.

Reality is that, which when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. -Philip K. Dick
BlackHumor Unreliable Narrator from Zombie City Since: Jan, 2001
#27: Apr 22nd 2011 at 7:22:25 AM

[up]:Assume unintentional unless told otherwise?

I'm convinced that our modern day analogues to ancient scholars are comedians. -0dd1
shimaspawn from Here and Now Since: May, 2010 Relationship Status: In your bunk
#28: Apr 22nd 2011 at 7:28:32 AM

[up] Then we get edit wars over Word of God and we have to have two separate tropes for every mistake that's made and people argue that just because Word of God did it on purpose doesn't mean they still weren't wrong In-Universe...

Reality is that, which when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. -Philip K. Dick
BlackHumor Unreliable Narrator from Zombie City Since: Jan, 2001
#29: Apr 22nd 2011 at 7:35:37 AM

[up]:Why do you have to assume that? I don't think tropers are quite as stupid as you're claiming they are.

I'm convinced that our modern day analogues to ancient scholars are comedians. -0dd1
Fighteer Lost in Space from The Time Vortex (Time Abyss) Relationship Status: TV Tropes ruined my love life
Lost in Space
#30: Apr 22nd 2011 at 7:35:43 AM

Guys, we aren't arguing over You Fail X. We're talking about this particular index. Rename it Logical Fallacies if we don't like "Artistic License". That's one of the redirects, after all.

edited 22nd Apr '11 7:36:05 AM by Fighteer

"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"
shimaspawn from Here and Now Since: May, 2010 Relationship Status: In your bunk
#31: Apr 22nd 2011 at 7:36:56 AM

I like Logical Fallacies

Reality is that, which when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. -Philip K. Dick
Discar Since: Jun, 2009
#32: Apr 22nd 2011 at 11:20:14 AM
Thumped: This post was thumped by the Stick of Off-Topic Thumping. Stay on topic, please.
Fighteer Lost in Space from The Time Vortex (Time Abyss) Relationship Status: TV Tropes ruined my love life
Lost in Space
Vidor Since: Nov, 2009
#34: Apr 22nd 2011 at 12:33:52 PM

Changing the name from anything other than "Artistic License" is clearly beneficial, so I vote for "Logical Fallacies".

Discar Since: Jun, 2009
#35: Apr 22nd 2011 at 1:22:50 PM

Another vote for Logical Fallacies (and Logical Fallacy as a redirect, if its not already). Should we get a crowner going, or are there not enough options?

EDIT: It is a redirect, so nevermind that part.

edited 22nd Apr '11 1:23:40 PM by Discar

jebuz I've been Bluelinked from Australia Since: Jan, 2001
I've been Bluelinked
#36: Apr 22nd 2011 at 3:55:42 PM

Voting for Logical Fallacies.

Australia The country with a 2 party system But all the power with independents
TweedyTL Since: Dec, 2010
#37: Apr 23rd 2011 at 3:45:48 AM

With regards to appeal to force: I checked the other wiki, and a few other sources, and none made the distinction between arguments and threats, calling both 'Appeal To Force'. I've made the distinction between the two clearer on the page, and stated that both threats and fallicious arguments can be appeal to force. Feel free to change this if you really think it's wrong, I was just going by common usage.

I also vote for calling this 'Logical Fallacies'. The Appeal to Force page should not be removed from the index, as it does sometimes apply to a real logical fallacy. The fact that the term could be applied the threats as well is simply stated on the same page.

edited 23rd Apr '11 3:49:05 AM by TweedyTL

Add Post

Total posts: 37
Top