Follow TV Tropes

Following

Poor Image: Jerk With A Heart Of Gold

Go To

eroock Since: Sep, 2012
#1: Jul 11th 2017 at 2:09:13 PM

The speech bubbles are illegible and the whole strip relies on the caption. Is this worth keeping? I'd say no.

Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#2: Jul 11th 2017 at 2:20:12 PM

Yeah, we need to find something more concise.

Berrenta How sweet it is from Texas Since: Apr, 2015 Relationship Status: Can't buy me love
How sweet it is
#3: Jul 11th 2017 at 2:26:51 PM

Not only that, but it was also changed without discussion. I'll message the culprit.

What it used to be:

https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/homer_flowers.jpg

Love me, dammit! note 

she/her | TRS needs your help! | Contributor of Trope Report
Gosicrystal Since: Jun, 2016 Relationship Status: Who needs love when you have waffles?
#4: Jul 11th 2017 at 2:32:59 PM

For what it's worth, I always thought the Simpsons pic wasn't a good illustration.

edited 11th Jul '17 2:33:10 PM by Gosicrystal

neoYTPism Since: May, 2010
#5: Jul 11th 2017 at 3:11:56 PM

[up] That and even within the Simpsons universe, it is edited.

Any panel arrangement from this that might work?

edited 11th Jul '17 3:12:34 PM by neoYTPism

eroock Since: Sep, 2012
#6: Jul 11th 2017 at 6:13:20 PM

https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/jerk_gold.jpg
^ This may be the best combo but it's still lacking in the jerkiness part.

Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#7: Jul 11th 2017 at 6:50:50 PM

[up] It's okay, but just okay.

neoYTPism Since: May, 2010
#8: Jul 11th 2017 at 7:57:55 PM

[up] Better than the Simpsons one, though?

Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#9: Jul 12th 2017 at 4:00:11 AM

[up] Yes, mainly because the "heart of gold" part is more visually evident in the last panel.

neoYTPism Since: May, 2010
#10: Jul 12th 2017 at 9:03:52 AM

Well, it'll make a good replacement in case we don't come up with anything better, then.

Willbyr MOD Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
AsForMyHandle No crack, Gromit! We’ve forgotten the crack! from Hell, Michigan, US Since: Aug, 2013 Relationship Status: YOU'RE TEARING ME APART LISA
No crack, Gromit! We’ve forgotten the crack!
#12: Jul 20th 2017 at 7:29:48 AM

Eh. 6 is okay.

''“You want a planet? I’ll give you a planet! Heck, I’ll give you your own solar system! No, I’ll give you a house... in Boca Raton!
SithPanda16 Since: Feb, 2016 Relationship Status: I know
TheUnsquished Filthy casual from Southern Limey Land (Life not ruined yet) Relationship Status: Married to the job
Filthy casual
#15: Jul 21st 2017 at 10:59:05 AM

6 is alright, I think.

(Annoyed grunt)
Zuxtron Berserk Button: misusing Nightmare Fuel from Node 03 (On A Trope Odyssey)
#16: Jul 21st 2017 at 11:22:30 AM

Nothing about 6 remotely suggests "jerk", so I'm not a fan of it.

Adept (Holding A Herring) Relationship Status: Having tea with Cthulhu
#17: Jul 22nd 2017 at 1:47:34 AM

Maybe it'd work better if we use the second panel from the source strip instead of the first one?

Zuxtron Berserk Button: misusing Nightmare Fuel from Node 03 (On A Trope Odyssey)
#18: Jul 22nd 2017 at 10:43:49 AM

Even the second panel makes him look silly rather than a jerk. The text even says that it's a lovable trait of his.

Gosicrystal Since: Jun, 2016 Relationship Status: Who needs love when you have waffles?
#19: Jul 22nd 2017 at 10:53:11 AM

Right. The image we seek must clearly show he's a jerk.

RoninMacbeth Since: Mar, 2017 Relationship Status: [TOP SECRET]
#20: Jul 27th 2017 at 3:54:14 PM

Do we really need an image? Half the trope pages here don't have one.

I'd show you my signature, but then I'd have to kill you. Oh wait...Sorry.
Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
neoYTPism Since: May, 2010
#22: Jul 27th 2017 at 7:05:15 PM

I wasn't expecting to see a crowner this soon, so I never did get around to looking into alternative panel arrangements until now. Here's one I came up with:

https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/alternativepanelarrangement.png

Of course, I don't mind this being imageless either (it's more about avoiding that Simpsons entry than pushing the Sonic one) but I figure it'd be a waste of a mention of that option to not give multiple panel arrangements a chance.

edited 27th Jul '17 7:05:48 PM by neoYTPism

Morgenthaler Since: Feb, 2016
#23: Jul 29th 2017 at 9:38:42 AM

^^^ That's not really an argument. No, strictly speaking none of the wiki pages need an image. The reason they're there is to get the meaning of a trope across more quickly.

I'm good to leave this imageless anyway. Sonic doesn't look like a jerk, and Homer is a victim of Manipulative Editing.

You've got roaming bands of armed, aggressive, tyrannical plumbers coming to your door, saying "Use our service, or else!"
neoYTPism Since: May, 2010
#24: Jul 29th 2017 at 4:23:38 PM

[up] Benefactor, actually. He's edited to look like he isn't strangling Bart.

I'm having some second thoughts about the Sonic entry myself, actually.

While we're on the subject of page images, the one for the subpage "other" is JAFAAC, and none of the rest of the subpages have page images, so we may as well leave that imageless too for a sense of symmetry until we can come up with page images for at least a few of the others.

edited 29th Jul '17 4:24:53 PM by neoYTPism

Gosicrystal Since: Jun, 2016 Relationship Status: Who needs love when you have waffles?
#25: Jul 29th 2017 at 5:28:18 PM

[up] That one's indeed Just a Face and a Caption. It should be pulled.

ImagePickin: JerkWithAHeartOfGold
27th Jul '17 4:06:21 PM

Crown Description:

Nominations for replacement images:

Total posts: 30
Top