Needs Help: Dominatrix

Courtesy link.

You may or may not remember me from another thread where I mentioned a canonically teenage character in a sex-related page image, but I've since come across another.

Only, unlike the Ms. Fanservice character, she's not even on an anime subpage, so we don't need to limit ourselves to anime options. Not that I don't have a non-teenage anime example in mind,◊ just that we don't need to limit ourselves to those.

What do others here think would be better for the page?

edited 27th Sep '16 12:31:41 PM by neoYTPism

Opened.

First image link is not working; I'm getting a 404 error.

Not sure what I think of the second.

There was only one image link. The 404'd link was to an article from another wiki referring to the character from the page image as being aged 16/17.

Even if it isn't necessarily a disqualifier for a page image, it should be considered a flaw, especially when characters who are older are also options.

Why does current need help again?

Because we're on a crusade, apparently. The current was chosen here; it's not my favorite of the options that was presented (that would either be this◊ or this) but it was what got consensus, and I'm not all that enthused to revisit it, especially since the current moved this one out of the "no pic" zone that Eddie insisted the page stay in for so long.

edited 27th Sep '16 3:18:52 PM by Willbyr

I don't see a pressing need to change the current, nor any notable improvement suggestion of it.

current is ok.

Keep Until Better Image Suggested

Keep

The Dominatrix page description clearly states that the character can be dominating in a non-sexual way too, and based on the Wiki page linked to in the first post, the character in the image is exactly that... So I don't understand why the image needs to be changed?

Even though I hate the character for exactly this kind of thing, keep.

agreed.

I don't like the suggestion either.

edited 29th Sep '16 2:04:47 AM by Memers