#27: Dec 13th 2015 at 12:48:51 PM
It doesn't imply that, it just says that.
Becky: Who are you? The Mysterious Stranger: An angel. Huck: What's your name? The Mysterious Stranger: Satan.
TheUnsquished
Filthy casual
from Southern Limey Land
(Life not ruined yet)
Relationship Status: Married to the job
#28: Dec 13th 2015 at 12:58:24 PM
Perhaps Willbyr's choice of caption is a better one, then.
(Annoyed grunt)
#29: Dec 13th 2015 at 2:57:30 PM
Or, you know, we could just tweak my suggestion. For example, "Made in 1776, burning brightly in 2004", gets around most of the complaints (and sounds a bit better as well).
#30: Dec 13th 2015 at 3:11:11 PM
Hmmmm...that's not a bad compromise.
eroock
Since: Sep, 2012
#31: Dec 13th 2015 at 5:43:49 PM
Throwing in a pothole to Ragnarök Proofing would be too much, or?
TheUnsquished
Filthy casual
from Southern Limey Land
(Life not ruined yet)
Relationship Status: Married to the job
#32: Dec 13th 2015 at 11:35:43 PM
29 is fine as-is.
(Annoyed grunt)
Komodin
TV Tropes' Sonic Wiki Curator
from Windy Hill Zone
Since: Jan, 2001
Relationship Status: I like big bots and I can not lie
TV Tropes' Sonic Wiki Curator
#33: Dec 14th 2015 at 4:17:29 AM
Yeah, the tweaked caption in #29 works well enough.
Experience has taught me to investigate anything that glows.
#34: Dec 16th 2015 at 1:20:58 AM
I like 29.
edited 16th Dec '15 1:22:49 AM by rodneyAnonymous
Becky: Who are you? The Mysterious Stranger: An angel. Huck: What's your name? The Mysterious Stranger: Satan.
#35: Dec 16th 2015 at 6:49:47 AM
29's in and tagged. Locking up.
Total posts: 35
The gist of rodney's argument, if I'm reading correctly, is that that caption implies that the torches were actually lit in 1776 and have been burning steadily since then.