Follow TV Tropes

Following

Wonder Woman Movie

Go To

Ekuran Since: Feb, 2010 Relationship Status: watch?v=dQw4w9WgXcQ
#101: Nov 30th 2015 at 12:29:53 PM

She really should be, since it sounds like the League is going to be her idea.

nervmeister Since: Oct, 2010
#102: Dec 1st 2015 at 7:18:47 AM

[up]Well, she is a warrior with centuries of experience under her belt. But how good of a group tactician is she?

edited 1st Dec '15 7:24:26 AM by nervmeister

Bur Chaotic Neutral from Flyover Country Since: Dec, 2009 Relationship Status: Not war
#103: Dec 1st 2015 at 7:31:48 AM

I wasn't remotely interested until I found out its WWI era. And now because of my WWI-nerdness my hopes and dreams for this movie are entirely unreachable.

Goddamnit.

edited 1st Dec '15 7:32:48 AM by Bur

i. hear. a. sound.
windleopard from Nigeria Since: Nov, 2014 Relationship Status: Non-Canon
nervmeister Since: Oct, 2010
#105: Dec 10th 2015 at 10:44:58 AM

[up]"Women" as in the audience? I think Marvel already did that (thanks Hiddleston). [lol]

Halberdier17 We Are With You Zack Snyder from Western Pennsylvania Since: Aug, 2013 Relationship Status: Dating Catwoman
We Are With You Zack Snyder
#106: Dec 10th 2015 at 12:44:32 PM

[up]Not really if you look at the graph the only action movie with more than 50% of the audience was female was the Hunger Games.

Batman Ninja more like Batman's Bizarre Adventure
nervmeister Since: Oct, 2010
#107: Dec 10th 2015 at 1:03:29 PM

[up]Oh, I see. They want to make the first superhero film where the majority of box office sales come from women. Interesting. Now I honestly want to see if they can pull it off.

Swanpride Since: Jun, 2013
#108: Dec 10th 2015 at 1:28:41 PM

Not if they go into it with that attitude. What woman want to see more than anything else is good stories and good characters. If said characters happens to be female, it's even better. But movies which try to pander to the female demographic tend to be really, really awful.

nervmeister Since: Oct, 2010
#109: Dec 10th 2015 at 3:20:16 PM

[up]Good point. On that note, I hope those who had creative control of Mo S and Bv S keep their distance from this one.

Halberdier17 We Are With You Zack Snyder from Western Pennsylvania Since: Aug, 2013 Relationship Status: Dating Catwoman
We Are With You Zack Snyder
#110: Dec 10th 2015 at 3:47:07 PM

[up]It is the same producers but Patty Jenkins is directing. I don't know who is writing it Jason Fuchs (Pan) is getting credit but he might not have written script used.

The Writer's Guild Union has it that the first person to write a treatment has to get credit even if what they have written isn't even used.

Batman Ninja more like Batman's Bizarre Adventure
Halberdier17 We Are With You Zack Snyder from Western Pennsylvania Since: Aug, 2013 Relationship Status: Dating Catwoman
Halberdier17 We Are With You Zack Snyder from Western Pennsylvania Since: Aug, 2013 Relationship Status: Dating Catwoman
LordofLore Since: Jun, 2012 Relationship Status: Consider his love an honor
Halberdier17 We Are With You Zack Snyder from Western Pennsylvania Since: Aug, 2013 Relationship Status: Dating Catwoman
Halberdier17 We Are With You Zack Snyder from Western Pennsylvania Since: Aug, 2013 Relationship Status: Dating Catwoman
alliterator Since: Jan, 2001
#116: Jan 17th 2016 at 9:38:54 PM

Chris Pine and Gal Gadot in period dress? Goddamn, I love this movie already.

KJMackley Since: Jan, 2001
#117: Jan 17th 2016 at 10:17:22 PM

It looks like they're trying to get her sword and shield through customs.

nervmeister Since: Oct, 2010
#119: Jan 18th 2016 at 8:25:41 AM

The Wonder Woman Movie Has a Brilliant Approach To Getting Diana Right

The Wonder Woman movie is making a pretty bold change to her origin—but this isn’t just another example of DC Comics screwing needlessly with its characters. I’m here to tell you why this particular alteration is a brilliant idea. Spoilers ahead...

If you haven’t heard the rumors (or seen the set pics), it might have come as a bit of a shock to hear Chris Pine confirm the historical setting of the Wonder Woman movie to be World War I. “WWI?” you asked. “Surely that’s a typo for World War II?” The answer is no, but this is actually a good thing.

Sure, it’s incredibly strange to think that the movie will be debuting Wonder Woman earlier than her actual comics did—she first appeared in All Star Comics in 1941—and if you’re not much of a history buff, substituting one World War for another can sound like a needlessly superficial alteration, a change just to be different. But it actually gives me hope that director Patty Jenkins has a great plan for the Amazonian Princess.

World War II is often referred to unironically as a “good” war. Not that war itself is fun of course, but the Nazis were so unequivocally evil, they had to be stopped. The Allies were fighting actual villains, making them the heroes of the conflict. There was a reason why it was so easy to write about superheroes joining the fight—they fit so naturally into the narrative.

Obviously, whether WW 2 really was “good” is highly debatable, but what’s undeniable is that no other war in modern history has managed to seem so transparently heroic—especially not World War I. WW 1 was born out of colonial expansion and greed and intolerance. It was about land and revenge and hate. Between the trenches, the mustard gas, and the utter lack of defenses, it was unbelievably brutal, especially for those men who suffered and died purely over a few feet of land, sent by other men who never concerned themselves with their suffering.

And when Wonder Woman leaves Themyscira for the first time, this is the world she will see.

She will see war at its most brutal, and men at their most cruel and callous. Everything her mother, Queen Hippolyta, will have warned her about the dangers of men and the world outside Themyscira will be true, to the most horrific degree possible.

See, if Wonder Woman entered the world during World War II, she would see a villain who needed to be stopped, and instantly join in the battle. It would be a noble fight, one that she would enter willingly and instantly, no emotional conflict necessary.

But now, when WW discovers WWI, there won’t be one person at fault, it will be men in general. And even though Wonder Woman is a warrior, the war she sees won’t be a noble struggle; it will be a nightmare of horrors designed to inflict pain and death on others. By choosing World War I as her new “origin,” if you will, the Wonder Woman movie looks like it’s making a bold claim about who the DC movie universe’s Wonder Woman is going to be—and especially what she fights against.

The best reason to do that is to make the contrast between the story’s main character and its setting. This Wonder Woman won’t be a merciless killer, as she’s (still) sometimes portrayed in the comics; if she was, there’d be no narrative advantage in changing her origin from World War II. It stands to reason that the movie will instead star a Wonder Woman who loves peace—and one who is willing to fight to achieve it.

Furthermore, the movie is giving Wonder Woman a setting where men have screwed everything up. I don’t expect Wonder Woman to save the world singlehandedly, but this also strongly implies that if the problem is caused by men, she’s not going to need a man to help fix things. Oh, she may need assistance, but she won’t need to rely on anyone’s masculinity.

This is a Wonder Woman I want to see on screen. Badly.

I may be a bit optimistic here. I suppose, given that the movie will still be in Zack Snyder’s DC movie-verse, than Wonder Woman will see the trenches of World War I and merely be excited to get in on the butchery. But again, I feel like if that’s what Jenkins was going for, the director would have stayed with World War II. Instead, she’s making sure Wonder Woman sees men and war at their worst. Why do that, unless Wonder Woman can save the day?

This is what Patty Jenkins is going for, I mean, in regards to the "moral crux" of the movie?

edited 18th Jan '16 10:31:23 AM by nervmeister

alliterator Since: Jan, 2001
#120: Jan 18th 2016 at 8:39:54 AM

No, that's the difference between World War I and World War II - basically, World War II is seen as the "good war" because the Nazis were just that evil, they had to be fought no matter what, but World War I is seen as a completely pointless war only fought due to greed and imperialism on all sides.

edited 18th Jan '16 8:40:09 AM by alliterator

Halberdier17 We Are With You Zack Snyder from Western Pennsylvania Since: Aug, 2013 Relationship Status: Dating Catwoman
We Are With You Zack Snyder
#121: Jan 18th 2016 at 8:57:10 AM

[up]WWI would also be a great setting to include Ares.

Though in the Animated movie from 2009 the H Bomb made Ares a lot stronger since he gets more powerful the more people kill each other during war.

Batman Ninja more like Batman's Bizarre Adventure
nervmeister Since: Oct, 2010
#122: Jan 18th 2016 at 10:02:29 AM

[up]Oh, Im 99 percent sure Ares will be manipulating WWI behind the scenes.

Halberdier17 We Are With You Zack Snyder from Western Pennsylvania Since: Aug, 2013 Relationship Status: Dating Catwoman
We Are With You Zack Snyder
#123: Jan 18th 2016 at 10:29:35 AM

Think we might see Hans von Hammer from the Enemy Ace comics since it is WWI?

edited 18th Jan '16 10:42:02 AM by Halberdier17

Batman Ninja more like Batman's Bizarre Adventure
nervmeister Since: Oct, 2010
#124: Jan 18th 2016 at 12:36:03 PM

[up]Would be a decent cameo. Now what I'm curious about is if Dr. Psycho will show up in this film or in a later one taking place in the present. They could do him in either era. Personally, I think WWI would be ideal since that's when the field of psychology started getting involved in military research.

edited 18th Jan '16 1:00:38 PM by nervmeister


Total posts: 4,218
Top