Follow TV Tropes

Following

Does Not Illustrate: Absurdly High Level Cap

Go To

Deadlock Clock: Jan 3rd 2015 at 11:59:00 PM
LucaEarlgrey Since: Dec, 2012
#1: Dec 6th 2014 at 3:39:16 AM

The description of the trope is "level cap that is much higher than needed to complete the game"—for example, a game with a level cap of 99 that can be completed at level 50.

The image shows a character profile with the level shown at 9999, some stats, and nothing else.

The third paragraph of the trope description reads: "Note that this is not just about games with really, really high level caps, but for games where poor pacing of experience means you won't get anywhere near it without absurd amounts of Level Grinding. A game can have a level cap of, say, 30, but if you reach about 15 by the end of the game, it counts. (Likewise, if the level cap is something like 999, but is easily attainable by the end of the game, this trope does not apply)"

Let's just say someone who has no knowledge of Disgaea were to look at this image: How could such a reader tell whether lv. 9999 is reachable well before the end of the game (especially without any level-boosting sidequests), or the level requires sinking in a lot of time that is well beyond needed to finish the game?

I propose that this page be stripped of its image, unless someone else has a better idea for an image that would be relevant to the trope.

Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#2: Dec 7th 2014 at 5:39:14 PM

Agreed; the pic is running with the trope name and not the actual trope...it's kind of a misleading name, that's not helping anything.

AnotherDuck No, the other one. from Stockholm Since: Jul, 2012 Relationship Status: Mu
No, the other one.
#3: Dec 7th 2014 at 5:53:21 PM

Add a caption with something like, "You can easily finish the game before level 100."

Check out my fanfiction!
theAdeptRogue iRidescence Since: Nov, 2011 Relationship Status: Having tea with Cthulhu
iRidescence
#4: Dec 7th 2014 at 5:56:18 PM

I thought I saw this thread being made before, and it was closed because Lu thought it was illustrative enough.

Anyway, the caption can be changed to something like Duck's suggestion, and it would be alright.

Memers Since: Aug, 2013
#5: Dec 7th 2014 at 6:02:54 PM

'The final boss is level 90' which is true it is 90.

edited 7th Dec '14 6:03:25 PM by Memers

MrL1193 Since: Apr, 2013
#6: Dec 7th 2014 at 6:03:29 PM

[up][up] I was thinking the same thing. What's really strange is that, according to the page history, Willbyr was the one who put the note linking to that thread on the page—and yet now this thread is open, even though the OP (by the same person) is essentially making the same argument as last time. Color me confused.

Er, anyway, I guess I can see how the image wouldn't quite guide readers in the proper direction, but I'm at a loss for better ways to picture the trope.

edited 7th Dec '14 6:03:34 PM by MrL1193

Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#7: Dec 7th 2014 at 7:43:21 PM

Whoops...well, changing the caption to point out the actual level cap instead of what's there will help, so I'm fine with 5.

edited 7th Dec '14 7:43:53 PM by Willbyr

Memers Since: Aug, 2013
#8: Dec 7th 2014 at 8:35:38 PM

here is a pic of the stats of the final boss of the second game I can not find a pic of the final boss of the first game but it is pretty much the same.

theAdeptrogue iRidescence Since: Nov, 2011 Relationship Status: Having tea with Cthulhu
iRidescence
#9: Dec 7th 2014 at 11:28:08 PM

[up]Not sure that's really necessary though. It's just making the image busier than it should be.

LucaEarlgrey Since: Dec, 2012
#10: Dec 8th 2014 at 9:50:49 AM

A caption change would be a fair compromise. The important point to get out is how high it is relative to what you need for the last boss.

Memers Since: Aug, 2013
#11: Dec 8th 2014 at 12:09:26 PM

What sucks though with our current image is the stats in the image are so low for the series... compare D4's ultimate bonus boss But I really can't find anything better for the actual characters.

AnotherDuck No, the other one. from Stockholm Since: Jul, 2012 Relationship Status: Mu
No, the other one.
#12: Dec 8th 2014 at 12:19:35 PM

I like how the stats don't even fit the stat screen. But it's the boss, not the player characters, so it doesn't fit the trope.

Check out my fanfiction!
Memers Since: Aug, 2013
#13: Dec 8th 2014 at 1:14:00 PM

alright here we go

edited 8th Dec '14 1:15:04 PM by Memers

AnotherDuck No, the other one. from Stockholm Since: Jul, 2012 Relationship Status: Mu
No, the other one.
#14: Dec 8th 2014 at 2:08:52 PM

And then we have the same as the current image, give or take quality. Remember that the stats don't actually illustrate the trope. It's only about the level.

Check out my fanfiction!
LucaEarlgrey Since: Dec, 2012
#15: Dec 9th 2014 at 9:49:48 PM

For now, I've amended the caption as per Another Duck's suggestion.

rodneyAnonymous Sophisticated as Hell from empty space Since: Aug, 2010
#16: Dec 9th 2014 at 10:08:08 PM

"For reference" is Word Cruft.

Becky: Who are you? The Mysterious Stranger: An angel. Huck: What's your name? The Mysterious Stranger: Satan.
SeptimusHeap from Switzerland (Edited uphill both ways) Relationship Status: Mu
#17: Dec 31st 2014 at 1:50:53 AM

Clock is set.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#18: Dec 31st 2014 at 6:39:21 AM

I'm still good with adding a caption to the current to show the discrepancy, per 5.

SeptimusHeap from Switzerland (Edited uphill both ways) Relationship Status: Mu
#19: Dec 31st 2014 at 6:42:07 AM

5 is OK for me as an option, by the way.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
nitrokitty Since: Jun, 2010 Relationship Status: Love is for the living, Sal
#20: Jan 8th 2015 at 3:04:41 PM

I think it's fine as is now that the caption has been added.

Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#21: Jan 8th 2015 at 8:55:13 PM

Agreed, the new caption fixes the initial problem. I'm good to close this; anyone else?

AnotherDuck No, the other one. from Stockholm Since: Jul, 2012 Relationship Status: Mu
No, the other one.
Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#23: Jan 13th 2015 at 8:22:44 PM

Since it's been almost a week, that's good enough for me. Locking up.

Add Post

Total posts: 23
Top