Nope, you're right, there's no distinction between them. Probably because they're both pages about the sentence, rather than the trope that the sentence flags.
Both of them need attention, but we certainly don't need both of them.
...if you don’t love you’re dead, and if you do, they’ll kill you for it.This page here can safely be cut.
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard FeynmanAgree to cut. It's no different from We Will Meet Again.
It does not matter who I am. What matters is, who will you become? - motto of Omsk Bird[tangent]...and stuff like this was the (initial) reason for drafting No New Stock Phrases.[/tangent]
So are we talking cut-and-redirect or just 'cut' cut?
An Ear Worm is like a Rickroll: It is never going to give you up.I say cut.
And with only 25 wicks and 18 inbounds, I don't think a redirect is necessary
Agreed.
snip snip
Bump; any more votes in favour of cutting?
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard FeynmanSure. I'll throw in another vote in favor of cutting.
Bigotry will NEVER be welcome on TV Tropes.I also vote to cut.
That seems like enough consensus; now we only need to dewick, add a note to the discussion page and cutlist.
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard FeynmanDewick complete. I've either deleted the entries or change them to We Will Meet Again.
Thank you!
It does not matter who I am. What matters is, who will you become? - motto of Omsk BirdIt's cutlisted.
It's cut.
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard FeynmanLooks like we're done, then. Locking up.
This page is basically a smaller, more malnourished version of We Will Meet Again. There doesn't seem to be any distinction at all.
edited 25th Apr '14 4:39:38 PM by Vox