They're not? Hm, I'm sold a little on some of them.
Are they even really the trope? I feel like they're more illustrating than the trope.
Found a Youtube Channel with political stances you want to share? Hop on over to this page and add them.Like I said, probably not even close.
Really?... Which ones?
And I think we should avoid literal images because it'll obfuscate the actual meaning of the trope. It's not an obvious trope from the name alone so anything that makes it less clear is bad. I only like pun-based or literal images when the trope is straightforward and doesn't really NEED further illustration.
As such I'm definitely down to pull without replacement.
Found a Youtube Channel with political stances you want to share? Hop on over to this page and add them.Agreed, especially applies to the current as well, regardless of poor quality.
They're illustrating the trope name not the trope. Since this trope is about something a character says, in a given circumstance, it will probably need to be a comic to avoid JAFAAC.
...if you don’t love you’re dead, and if you do, they’ll kill you for it.Motion to pull the current
Terrible quality and not the trope.I don't know where to find a good image, though.
That was the amazing part. Things just keep going.Seconded, that needs to be flushed.
Thirdeded... pulled.
Clock is set.
Clock's up; locking for inactivity. No further action is to be taken based on this thread.
The current quality is atrocious. Can anybody say 1987 56k gif compression via lossy downscaling? That felt so dirty.
Perhaps a crop of this◊ or this◊ or even one◊ of the these?
(Not that I feel any are particularly outstanding.)