Follow TV Tropes

Following

Synopsis namespace not thriving

Go To

SeptimusHeap from Switzerland (Edited uphill both ways) Relationship Status: Mu
#26: Aug 25th 2013 at 11:54:01 AM

I have no idea how "summarizing a work" and "providing work pages for episodes in serial works" are the same thing.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
videogmer314 from that one place Since: Dec, 2009 Relationship Status: Yes, I'm alone, but I'm alone and free
#27: Aug 25th 2013 at 11:55:43 AM

[up] Think of it as "summarizing one large work" vs. "summarizing smaller entries in a serial work".

SeptimusHeap from Switzerland (Edited uphill both ways) Relationship Status: Mu
#28: Aug 25th 2013 at 12:01:29 PM

A trope list is not a summary. It's just not. And nothing says that recap pages have to be long synopses.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
LordGro from Germany Since: May, 2010
#29: Aug 25th 2013 at 12:04:24 PM

Recap/ pages are works pages. Synopsis/ are subpages to works pages.

I don't think there's a benefit in merging the two.

Let's just say and leave it at that.
Twentington Since: Apr, 2009 Relationship Status: Desperate
#30: Aug 25th 2013 at 1:22:16 PM

[up]Then you'd rather the Synopsis space sit gathering dust and not thriving?

This is quickly devolving into "We should do something." "Should we do something?" "We should do something." "Should we do something?"

videogmer314 from that one place Since: Dec, 2009 Relationship Status: Yes, I'm alone, but I'm alone and free
#31: Aug 25th 2013 at 1:36:54 PM

[up][up][up] I said nothing about trope lists. And most Recap/ pages I've seen actually do involve long summaries of what happened in the episode.

LordGro from Germany Since: May, 2010
#32: Aug 25th 2013 at 1:44:12 PM

@Twentington: Well, it was you in the first place who said "we should do something." And my opinion is that we should do nothing.

Edit: By the way, this is already the third thread on the very same topic you started: [1] [2] Why start new threads on an old topic? Is it because the old threads did not go the way you wished for?

edited 25th Aug '13 1:54:41 PM by LordGro

Let's just say and leave it at that.
Irene (4 Score & 7 Years Ago)
#33: Aug 25th 2013 at 1:51:15 PM

The serve the same purpose, even if done a somewhat different way. Except, as pointed out, some Recaps are just summaries too.

They should be merged, since there's no significant differences among their purposes. Having rules for how specific ones are done is fine. But the different namespaces are just plain redundant now.

TotemicHero No longer a forum herald from the next level Since: Dec, 2009
No longer a forum herald
#34: Aug 25th 2013 at 1:52:42 PM

I love how everyone is treating this like the only options are "merge the recap namespace into synopsis" and "do nothing".

One issue not brought up is that recap pages don't have the "certain tropes go here and not on the main page" aspect that character pages do. I don't see a good way to enforce that rule for both character pages and recap pages simultaneously, and I'm not sure how you could classify something as a "work page" unless that rule was in effect.

I'm beginning to wonder if the reverse idea might be better: clean up the recap pages to match a certain standard, and then move them into Synopsis/.

Expergiscēre cras, medior quam hodie. (Awaken tomorrow, better than today.)
SeptimusHeap from Switzerland (Edited uphill both ways) Relationship Status: Mu
#35: Aug 25th 2013 at 1:56:57 PM

Synopses don't need trope lists. They just summarize a work.

In works with episode Recap/ pages, episode specific tropes go there.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
Irene (4 Score & 7 Years Ago)
#36: Aug 25th 2013 at 2:06:19 PM

Those tropes are just a summary overall of the events. It's the same overall thing. They may be done in a different way, but they both summarize the events of the episode or season or series.

So no, they are only different on a very technical scale.

Definitely don't see a need for a separation anymore.

TotemicHero No longer a forum herald from the next level Since: Dec, 2009
No longer a forum herald
#37: Aug 25th 2013 at 2:08:02 PM

I'm against the exclusive trope lists on recap, since it makes finding tropes harder for people who aren't familiar with a work. Having to comb through the recap pages episode by episode is not my idea of fun. Plus, all the recap pages will confuse Google (I've seen this before with several subpages showing up in front of the main work page on searches), which makes navigation harder. Cutting the exclusive trope lists off of them will reduce page views, thus dropping them down the search rankings and making the main work page easier to find.

So I've kind of moved to the merge camp, although I think it needs to be managed a little more carefully than some of the other people have said.

Expergiscēre cras, medior quam hodie. (Awaken tomorrow, better than today.)
SeptimusHeap from Switzerland (Edited uphill both ways) Relationship Status: Mu
#38: Aug 25th 2013 at 2:10:41 PM

Eh... I've rarely seen a page without a note telling where the tropes are, and it's an easier solution than a merge.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
TotemicHero No longer a forum herald from the next level Since: Dec, 2009
No longer a forum herald
#39: Aug 25th 2013 at 2:13:52 PM

It doesn't really matter if you say "episode specific tropes are on the recap pages" if the person in question doesn't know the episode name, the episode number, or the season number of whatever episode had the trope they are looking for. (And the latter two aren't always used in recap page titles, as I noted before, meaning they have to go by episode name only.)

Expergiscēre cras, medior quam hodie. (Awaken tomorrow, better than today.)
SeptimusHeap from Switzerland (Edited uphill both ways) Relationship Status: Mu
#40: Aug 25th 2013 at 2:15:33 PM

Most of these items land on the main trope lists. Which happens with character tropes or franchises too.

Also, removing Recap/ trope lists looks like a different discussion than fixing Synopsis.

edited 25th Aug '13 2:16:51 PM by SeptimusHeap

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
LordGro from Germany Since: May, 2010
#41: Aug 25th 2013 at 2:21:36 PM

@Irene: What would be the advantage of merging the two? It's true only a small number of works currently has a Synopsis/. But new synopses, recaps, whatever will not miraculously appear if we merge Recap/ and Synopsis/. The amount of actual content will stay exactly the same, whether they're merged or not.

Then why it is so important to merge them? It's not a huge problem that Synopsis/ is a small namespace. It would be nice if more tropers would write synopses/recaps, but we can't force them, can we? It hurts nobody if there are few pages in the namespace, and a merge won't in any way increase the number of synopses/recaps.

edited 25th Aug '13 2:22:54 PM by LordGro

Let's just say and leave it at that.
TotemicHero No longer a forum herald from the next level Since: Dec, 2009
No longer a forum herald
#42: Aug 25th 2013 at 2:22:22 PM

The issue is underuse of Synopsis. We can fold Synopsis under Recap, change Recap to be a little closer to Synopsis and fold Recap into Synopsis, or we can merely encourage more use of Synopsis and do nothing else.

Recap has problems as a namespace too (multiple different uses where there probably should not be), and if it's possible to kill two birds with one stone, I'd do it. So I'm in favor of any solution that handle both (and if we're doing a merge, we ought to be handling both).

Expergiscēre cras, medior quam hodie. (Awaken tomorrow, better than today.)
LordGro from Germany Since: May, 2010
#43: Aug 25th 2013 at 2:31:08 PM

A merge would solve neither namespace's problems. The problems will stay the exact same.

Let's just say and leave it at that.
TotemicHero No longer a forum herald from the next level Since: Dec, 2009
No longer a forum herald
#44: Aug 25th 2013 at 2:49:08 PM

If there's enough of something visible, more people will check it out. So if Synopsis alone doesn't draw enough attention (a problem Recap may have), then merging the two of them together will. Furthermore, to facilitate the move, we'd have to come up with some guidelines for the shared namespace, which would help stop the worst of Recap's problem of being used for too many different things. So, yeah, I'm not sure I see how you can say it won't solve the issue.

If you have alternative answers, fine, but I'd prefer a single unified solution that addresses both.

Expergiscēre cras, medior quam hodie. (Awaken tomorrow, better than today.)
crazysamaritan NaNo 4328 / 50,000 from Lupin III Since: Apr, 2010
NaNo 4328 / 50,000
#45: Aug 25th 2013 at 2:56:00 PM

It looks to me that the problem was the Name Space for individual episode work pages being named a synonym to Synopsis. A short description of the episode could go on the Synopsis page, and the Recap page could be treated as an actual work page, but, I think the misuse occurred because "Recap" means synopsis. So the full solution would need to include renaming the recap Name Space.

Link to TRS threads in project mode here.
MorganWick (Elder Troper)
#46: Aug 25th 2013 at 7:33:43 PM

Or not having individual episode work pages. Others have suggested they may be more trouble than they're worth.

I think originally, Recap pages didn't have trope lists.

SeptimusHeap from Switzerland (Edited uphill both ways) Relationship Status: Mu
#47: Aug 26th 2013 at 12:14:24 AM

While it's Name Space and not Name Space, I could see a rename. As for removing the trope lists ... actually, I am kind of blanking. I've never encountered a problem like that.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
Twentington Since: Apr, 2009 Relationship Status: Desperate
#48: Aug 26th 2013 at 1:59:00 AM

By the way, this is already the third thread on the very same topic you started: Why start new threads on an old topic? Is it because the old threads did not go the way you wished for?

Because the last two threads failed to reach a consensus, and nothing ever got done because no two people could agree on a single thing.

That's all I'm looking for, is something to be done. There seems to be more voices this time saying that the problem exists, but once again, literally everyone has a different solution.

SeptimusHeap from Switzerland (Edited uphill both ways) Relationship Status: Mu
#49: Aug 26th 2013 at 3:02:00 AM

I wonder if this is actually a problem that can/should be fixed by anything going beyond "Please add more synopses, people".

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
Twentington Since: Apr, 2009 Relationship Status: Desperate
#50: Aug 26th 2013 at 3:12:57 AM

[up]I think "pimp out the Synopsis space more, so people know it friggin' exists" is also a feasible idea.

PageAction: Synopsis
30th Sep '13 12:12:29 PM

Crown Description:

This crowner is for choosing which way(s) we can improve the usage of the Synopsis namespace. Keep in mind that not all of the choices are mutually exclusive.

Total posts: 139
Top