Follow TV Tropes

Following

Covenant Academy - Discussion Thread

Go To

Wysp The Man in Black Since: Jan, 2001
The Man in Black
#26: Jul 22nd 2013 at 5:18:45 PM

Anno has confirmed that humans with myths around them (IE Arthur or Achilles) would work out just fine.

"Your mission is not to nuke the squid god." —Faramir
Dblade26 The Grand Re-Vizier from Everywhere Since: Dec, 2011
The Grand Re-Vizier
#27: Jul 22nd 2013 at 5:20:58 PM

Um, I dunno about Achilles, but Arthur's myth ends in some versions with him outright traveling into a mythical land separate from human beings. Also both of them would be unavailable anyways because their stories endings make them so. so...yeah.

edited 22nd Jul '13 5:21:50 PM by Dblade26

AnnoR "Of course, Satsuki-sama." from Honnouji Academy Since: Sep, 2010
"Of course, Satsuki-sama."
#28: Jul 22nd 2013 at 5:22:40 PM

Um... I really shouldn't make GM posts when it's late, honestly. I rescind what I said before.

"Oh, dear. The toad, the monkey, and the dog have all screwed up."
Luthen Char! from Down Under Burgess Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: Playing Cupid
Char!
#29: Jul 22nd 2013 at 5:23:22 PM

Playing devil's advocate here, but could Sabre go for something like how the Winchester Brothers investigated The Greys only to find it was the lesser The Fair Folk?

Have the MIB being Loki just being a dick/adapting with the times, or something?

edited 22nd Jul '13 5:23:37 PM by Luthen

You must agree, my plan is sheer elegance in its simplicity! My Tumblr
Wysp The Man in Black Since: Jan, 2001
The Man in Black
#30: Jul 22nd 2013 at 5:27:34 PM

Soo...considering that Achilles and Arthur are kinda mythology, where do they stand?

"Your mission is not to nuke the squid god." —Faramir
SabresEdge Show an affirming flame from a defense-in-depth Since: Oct, 2010
Show an affirming flame
#31: Jul 22nd 2013 at 5:29:05 PM

re: RD: what is a myth if not a fancy story? There are plenty of figures who blur the line between mythology and reality—see my point about George Washington. Or, to take another example, Virgil the poet. The man who recorded the Aeneid was a historical figure; the shade who guided Dante through Hell was not. Therefore the second should be up for contact; the first should not—even if the myth says they are one and the same. You see the problem.

re: Anno: so, set down some concrete limitations; I've proposed two possible ones already. Whatever rules you set down must be consistent across time and cultures, though. (Let us take some hypothetical culture that's into ancestor worship, and which would take their powers and guidance through the deceased souls of their real-life antecedents. How would that apply?) Clarify the rules and I'll follow.

Charlie Stross's cheerful, optimistic predictions for 2017, part one of three.
tachikaze from Australia Since: Apr, 2009
#32: Jul 22nd 2013 at 5:29:31 PM

[up][up]Neither of them are acceptable.

[up]You're missing the qualifiers of monsters, gods, titans and magical, aren't you? >.>

edited 22nd Jul '13 5:30:29 PM by tachikaze

Burn up, hurricane of justice!
SabresEdge Show an affirming flame from a defense-in-depth Since: Oct, 2010
Show an affirming flame
#33: Jul 22nd 2013 at 5:32:52 PM

Therefore, explicitly nonhuman. Which I'd specifically asked to be clarified, and which I'd gotten no direct answer on. Now that I have, I know which constraints I'll be working with.

Charlie Stross's cheerful, optimistic predictions for 2017, part one of three.
Wysp The Man in Black Since: Jan, 2001
The Man in Black
#34: Jul 22nd 2013 at 5:34:57 PM

...So where does that leave the Flying Dutchman?

"Your mission is not to nuke the squid god." —Faramir
SabresEdge Show an affirming flame from a defense-in-depth Since: Oct, 2010
Show an affirming flame
#35: Jul 22nd 2013 at 5:45:14 PM

I can accept the caveat that "ghosts = magical" and leave it at that, which would resolve points about ancestor worship, calling upon the dead (see: necromancy, vodun, all that), and all that.

For that point, I've found something which I think will be acceptable: the Angels of Mons. The Battle of Mons in 1914 marked the first occasion that the British Expeditionary Force fought with the German army. It was a decisive British victory. After the battle, rumors and legends began circulating about apparitions who fought alongside and protected the British riflemen. The final form the legend took was that the ghosts or angels of British longbowmen who fought at Agincourt nearly 500 years ago descended to help the BEF repel the German assault.

That should qualify easily enough. With GM approval I'll start hashing out the character.

Charlie Stross's cheerful, optimistic predictions for 2017, part one of three.
tachikaze from Australia Since: Apr, 2009
#36: Jul 22nd 2013 at 6:10:08 PM

[up]No. Dead people are dead. Not magical beings that you can make a contract with.

Going on from the "dead people are dead" bit, no, you can't have the ghost of a British archer.

In short, that idea is not acceptable.

edited 22nd Jul '13 6:16:09 PM by tachikaze

Burn up, hurricane of justice!
Wysp The Man in Black Since: Jan, 2001
The Man in Black
#37: Jul 22nd 2013 at 6:14:29 PM

...soooo where does that leave the Flying Dutchman?

"Your mission is not to nuke the squid god." —Faramir
SabresEdge Show an affirming flame from a defense-in-depth Since: Oct, 2010
Show an affirming flame
#38: Jul 22nd 2013 at 6:16:05 PM

Actually, they were mentioned as angels (subtype, guardian). They may have appeared in the guise of the dead bowmen, but in the original story it was mentioned as divine intervention, and whether they were ghosts or angels masquerading as such isn't answered. See: Angel Unaware. It'd be completely inconsistent to leave out angels while letting in gods and titans.

Charlie Stross's cheerful, optimistic predictions for 2017, part one of three.
GlobsterAGoGo from Mobile Leprechaun's alt account Since: Jan, 2013 Relationship Status: Above such petty unnecessities
#39: Jul 22nd 2013 at 6:50:59 PM

Herp, seems like I haven't posted here yet. Hello, all. :)

and then they fricked in the booty
tachikaze from Australia Since: Apr, 2009
#40: Jul 22nd 2013 at 11:10:42 PM

[up][up][up]The Dutchman would be fine.

[up][up]I'm sorry, but based on the amount of stress and frustration you have caused thus far, not just for me, but for several others, I'm going to have to ask you to leave under the second rule in the signup thread.

That said, in case anyone else was wondering, angels would be fine.

[up]Hi.

edited 22nd Jul '13 11:12:31 PM by tachikaze

Burn up, hurricane of justice!
Brahian1 Maid of Time from Where Nothing Gathers Since: Jul, 2013 Relationship Status: He makes me feel like I have a heart
Maid of Time
#41: Jul 22nd 2013 at 11:15:14 PM

Question: Would Odin count as a death god? His role in the myths is extremely expansive, so I'm not sure if he'd count enough as a deathgod to get him disqualified.

Another question: Seeing as its gotten its own mythos over the past few years, would the Slender Man count as a mythical being? And what about the Crumple-Horned Snorkack of Harry Potter lore? Would the Jabberwock be acceptable?

Just a couple ideas before I decide what to do for my character.

i think i mostly want to see what happens when this whole place breaks apart
tachikaze from Australia Since: Apr, 2009
#42: Jul 22nd 2013 at 11:33:20 PM

Odin would be fine, so long as you don't base his powers around the death god side of things.

Slendy and the Snorkack would not be acceptable though. And the Jabberwock would probably just be a dragon, based on most if the pictures/descriptions of it I've seen.

Burn up, hurricane of justice!
SabresEdge Show an affirming flame from a defense-in-depth Since: Oct, 2010
Show an affirming flame
#43: Jul 22nd 2013 at 11:46:02 PM

Don't think of it as "stress and frustration". Think of it as "world-building via stress-testing"—I think of it as a player's duty to find the edges in the world the GM builds (in this case, 'what exactly qualifies as folklore? Does X? Why not Y?'), and the GM's duty is to resolve those issues in order to make for a more coherent story. I suspect that you'll be seeing plenty of that from your other players once the game starts—perhaps not to the extent that I did, but it will happen, and it will test your patience. Be prepared!

In any case, I'll be elsewhere. And best of luck.

Charlie Stross's cheerful, optimistic predictions for 2017, part one of three.
Brahian1 Maid of Time from Where Nothing Gathers Since: Jul, 2013 Relationship Status: He makes me feel like I have a heart
Maid of Time
#44: Jul 22nd 2013 at 11:46:59 PM

[up][up]Alright, awesome. Thanks for the info.

i think i mostly want to see what happens when this whole place breaks apart
Wysp The Man in Black Since: Jan, 2001
The Man in Black
#45: Jul 22nd 2013 at 11:53:15 PM

I'm still baffled by the Flying Dutchman—it's a ghost ship, allegedly a sunken Dutch man-o-war, but yet somehow ghosts are not permitted? I don't mean to bother, I just can't figure out this conundrum.

"Your mission is not to nuke the squid god." —Faramir
SixthSaint The Gorgon from The Eye of Terror Since: Mar, 2013 Relationship Status: [TOP SECRET]
The Gorgon
#46: Jul 23rd 2013 at 3:19:45 AM

Maybe individual ghosts aren't permitted.

Time grows thin, the past's a riddle; The Tower awaits you in the middle.
RainehDaze Figure of Hourai from Scotland (Ten years in the joint) Relationship Status: Serial head-patter
Figure of Hourai
#47: Jul 23rd 2013 at 5:44:44 AM

Something about the captain being cursed in one telling. You could probably get the Wandering Jew in if you like making your character suffer.

Avatar Source
Dblade26 The Grand Re-Vizier from Everywhere Since: Dec, 2011
The Grand Re-Vizier
#48: Jul 23rd 2013 at 9:17:24 AM

Depending on the telling and the interpretation the crew of the Dutchman aren't so much dead as cursed with immortality in order to wander the seas because the Dutchman's captain was an idiot who made a sarcastic oath to god that he'd sail the seas forever if he didn't finish a specific voyage on time.

That said, no idea what kind of contract or powers you could get from that sort of situation.

edited 23rd Jul '13 9:22:40 AM by Dblade26

Wysp The Man in Black Since: Jan, 2001
The Man in Black
#49: Jul 23rd 2013 at 10:43:22 AM

Which still raises problems—the Flying Dutchman's crew and captain were supposed to be human. And humans, even the ones shrouded in myth like King Arthur or Achilles, are banned.

I'm so confused. @_@

"Your mission is not to nuke the squid god." —Faramir
AnnoR "Of course, Satsuki-sama." from Honnouji Academy Since: Sep, 2010
"Of course, Satsuki-sama."
#50: Jul 23rd 2013 at 10:55:50 AM

Achilles qualifies, actually. He's a demigod, technically. But, um, he's also kind of dead. So he doesn't, because he's dead, but, um, if he wasn't dead he would.

Arthur doesn't because he's fully human and incapacitated.

"Oh, dear. The toad, the monkey, and the dog have all screwed up."

Total posts: 59
Top