Poor Image: Babies Babies Everywhere

It must be a baby head, but all I can really make out is eyes. It shouldn't be too hard to come up with something representing infancy.

I don't see any unclarity.

I see it. Maybe it's your brightness or contrast.

edited 4th Jul '13 6:45:16 AM by Rethkir

That said, I can see where the OP is coming from as different monitors (e.g. on a small smartphone) may produce unclear images. With that in mind, there is room for improvement. Here are my suggestions:

• [1]◊
• [2]◊
• [3]◊

edited 4th Jul '13 7:12:15 AM by peasant

I kinda like 2.

I like 3 best, then 1, then 2. Touching each other and playing with simple toys is a good way to show baby behavior.

Bump; any other thoughts?

I personally like 3.

I wouldn't mind any of the suggestions so far. Would it at least be possible to find a quality upgrade where everyone can clearly see a nose on that sideways face? Current:

4.1 looks good to me. I think 4.2 is too clinical which may tend to be off-putting for some. I can't even see the third one. The site just gives me a custom error screen.

The current could be adjusted with some gamma reduction but the page is about babies, plural, and the image is a baby, singular. That's why I think 4.1 is better.

I pretty much agree with that reasoning about why 4.1 is better. Not too fond of the others.

Gosh darn it. I don't even remember what I suggested for in 4.3 so I can't reupload it. Sorry about that, folks. Does anyone remember?

I can see it, but honestly the washed-outness of the picture makes it look a bit creepy.

I googled 3 babies playing and found it◊. It's the second image on the page in case it doesn't come through.

Anyone else in favor of changing the image?

I hooked a crowner for this one.

Pre-weekend bump for votes.

It'll be a week tomorrow and the only thing that's shifted in the votes is the ones below the leader, so I think this is safe to call. The new pic's up and tagged.; add a caption if you want one. Locking up.