I was gonna root for them. But then they start praising iPad games and shit and I'm just *facepalm*
I really hate it when people think iPad games are the next big thing.
Follow me on Twitter, I'm pretty awesome http://www.twitter.com/ZekeFreekWell, they are still making for PC
But yeah, annoying thing about ipads is that I'd rather not play with machine where only way to do anything is touchscreen. I mean, with DS you at least have analog and dpad and stuff, but with ipad? Nooope. How you would play fighting game with only touchscreen?
edited 9th Mar '13 10:56:02 PM by SpookyMask
I have bigger issues with "mobile" games than just touchscreens.
Follow me on Twitter, I'm pretty awesome http://www.twitter.com/ZekeFreekWell, I agree with you that mobile games aren't really that good since they are just time passers and that mobile phones aren't good gaming platforms, but technically speaking mobile games could be good.
Mobile as in cell phones? No. Mobile as in Vita and 3DS? Of course.
I'd call it Freek's Law, but I'm sure the basic idea is already taken so I won't stroke my own ego. But generally speaking "Anything designed for a specific purpose will be superior to something designed to do everything". A game system will always be superior to a "system that also has games".
Follow me on Twitter, I'm pretty awesome http://www.twitter.com/ZekeFreekUmm, those are called handheld games.
Technically, isn't that untrue as PC are somewhat better for gaming than consoles in some respect? Though I guess you could argue that whole point of P Cs is ability to do everything.
edited 9th Mar '13 11:18:08 PM by SpookyMask
I was going for the more literal meaning of "mobile". In general I refer to them as "handhelds" or "portable" games though.
EDIT: Yeah, but P Cs are more free-form than Cell phones. You can MAKE a PC specifically for gaming. And the PC you make specifically for gaming will be superior to your grandma's piece of shit PC that isn't specifically tailored to anything.
edited 9th Mar '13 11:20:12 PM by ZekeFreek
Follow me on Twitter, I'm pretty awesome http://www.twitter.com/ZekeFreekAnd really, look at what the xbawks 360 can do with hardware not all that much better (and in many respects, such as RAM, worse) than Nana's POS (but new) laptop.
Guys, you can honestly do better than Smash Bros. Set the bar a little higher.
ALL CREATURE WILL DIE AND ALL THE THINGS WILL BE BROKEN. THAT'S THE LAW OF SAMURAI.It makes a lot of money though, doesn't it? Having truck loads of money is a quality all of its own.
Eh, I think they're just being idiots at this point, with the whole mobile platforms are the future and whatnot.
Alo, yes Team Meat. Demand your character, whose game hasn't actually been on a Nintendo console, to be in Smash Bros. Not to mention your split with Nintendo wasn't a friendly one. I'd doubt Nintendo would welcome back Team Meat with open arms at this point.
You got some dirt on you. Here's some more!The Smash Bros thing is pretty much bullshit. But I doubt that they were serious with that anyway.
However, with their focus on tablets they probably were serious, which makes it hard for me to take them serious. At least, it sounds as if they think that it's the future of video games. But maybe I'm interpreting too much into it.
People aren't as awful as the internet makes them out to be.Phil Fish is the most self righteous man I've ever seen. It would not surprise me if he were 100% serious with his "We'll make a game for you, but it won't be exclusive!" horse shit.
Remember! Hyperbole is an exaggeration made for comedic effect, and shouldn't be taken literally!Guys, look at specifically what he says:
Don't even get me started on Phil Fish.
Follow me on Twitter, I'm pretty awesome http://www.twitter.com/ZekeFreekAbe Vigoda?
Insert witty and clever quip here. My page, as the database hates my handle.
They want no part of the console war.
Jonah Falcon