NSFW/Image Macro: Kryptonite Proof Suit

So what with all the recent stuff going on with the wiki, and all sorts of stuff being purged, should this image be pulled? I don't really know if this is kosher with the current standards. It comes from a bottle of sunblock that you can buy at any local supermarket, but you never know.

...wasn't that image on billboards during the 60s?! I'm not saying it's especially illustrative, but...

edited 17th Apr '12 9:27:12 PM by animeg3282

Actually, it's a parody of this image◊, something decidedly nonsexual.

I'm opposed to it on the grounds that it doesn't seem representative of the trope.

How's this?◊, pending editing and resizing?

Kodomin, yep, that's the image I meant. I thought it was on billboards (i.e. a family friendly space) in the 60s (a different, stricter time).

As "from a Seltzer And Friedberg movie" as the current image is, it shows the trope fine. I like the idea of having the page image mirror the trope title, but the comic panel is a little complex.

Too close a parallel between title and image may make people assume it's Exactly What It Says on the Tin, when it's a pretty varied trope.

Clock is set.

I see nothing wrong with the existing picture. It is no more sexual than what it is a parody of. And what it is a parody of is not typically viewed as sexual. I think that taking it down is being overly cautious.

Clock's up; locking for inactivity/lack of consensus. No action is to be taken based on this thread.