That's weird, sort of feels like I said that.
Becky: Who are you? The Mysterious Stranger: An angel. Huck: What's your name? The Mysterious Stranger: Satan.
Hammer of the Pervs
Heh.
I guess the The Witches Of Eastwick image is actually pretty good. I just don't have a problem with the current one. I wouldn't be mad if that one got swapped in, though.
edited 11th Mar '12 3:33:17 PM by Martello
"Did anybody invent this stuff on purpose?" - Phillip Marlowe on tequila, Finger Man by Raymond Chandler.
Existence Weighed Against Nonbeing
The Witches Of Eastwick one is probably the best suggestion, and I won't complain if it gets swapped in, but I don't really think it's a huge improvement.
Reaction Image Repository
The Final ECW Champion
A picture from a work? That's easy. but I have to ask
◊, what does it add that the current picture does not? The current example is correct and easily to understand. We need proof that it's misleading people to what the trope is about, otherwise simply not liking it is not sufficient. Yes, we are a wiki about fiction, but we are not above pointing out when there is Truth in Television. Not being from a work is not valid.
- "We need proof that it's misleading people..." Absolutely not.
- "...simply not liking it is not sufficient." Yes it is. Of course it is. I think a movie frame (or etc.) looks better than a shampoo ad, and am guessing others do too.
edited 11th Mar '12 8:28:46 PM by rodneyAnonymous
Becky: Who are you? The Mysterious Stranger: An angel. Huck: What's your name? The Mysterious Stranger: Satan.
Existence Weighed Against Nonbeing
@Cider: Those are requirements for pulling an image without replacement. The criteria for replacing one image with another is simply "is it better than the previous image?", and given that they both illustrate the trope equally well it comes down to personal preference in this case.
Reaction Image Repository
Crowner?
I vote for "Change to Witches of Eastwick", if only because the ladies in the current image look seductive, while the ladies in the Witches of Eastwick one look... normal.
edited 14th Mar '12 2:03:49 AM by goto124
![[up]](https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/smiles/arrow_up.png "[up]"){kind=icon}
I'm not sure how that makes any difference.
No, it's not. First line of the page:
There's nothing wrong with the current image. It portrays the trope just fine, I don't see any reason to swap it.
edited 14th Mar '12 2:17:03 AM by Gaunt88
The witches are good, but not better than the current one.
I vote to keep the current one.
The Internet misuses, abuses, and overuses everything.
Gentleman Troper!
Why do most brunettes in this thread have black hair?
Rhetorical, eh? ... Eight!
Isn't brunette also used to referred to black hair as well? *
"If you aren't him, then you apparently got your brain from the same discount retailer, so..." - Fighteer
Gentleman Troper!
And there's also some examples from the trope that adds character's that has black hair with blue highlights.
Though back on topic, I have no problem with the current picture or the Witches of Eastwick. But I did find this in Google search.
[1]
◊
edited 14th Mar '12 7:07:40 AM by DFighter
I can't think of anything good for a signature.
We don't need an Image Dicussion for the current image. It's real life and it looks cool.
I see the Awesomeness.
Brunette includes brown and black.
Fight smart, not fair.
It's an odd trope since it's about a variety of hair colors and not personalities, but a shampoo add that shows off the hair probably is best.
.
edited 23rd Jul '17 2:46:54 PM by Jicragg
![[up]](https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/smiles/arrow_up.png "[up]")
This one doesn't really show personality either. The Charlies Angels pic kinda did.
"If you aren't him, then you apparently got your brain from the same discount retailer, so..." - Fighteer