Follow TV Tropes

Following

Better cancer treatment glossed over?

Go To

HiddenFacedMatt Avatars may be subject to change without notice. Since: Jul, 2011
Avatars may be subject to change without notice.
#1: Nov 19th 2011 at 10:39:08 AM

I came across this story online; I haven't watched the whole thing, but I do find it highly plausible that those with vested interests in current methods of cancer treatment would want to drown out a competing better one.

"The Daily Show has to be right 100% of the time; FOX News only has to be right once." - Jon Stewart
whaleofyournightmare Decemberist from contemplation Since: Jul, 2011
Decemberist
#2: Nov 19th 2011 at 10:59:52 AM

Well, what about countries with Socialised Medicine? They never found this "miracle cure" so colour me sceptical.

Dutch Lesbian
Desertopa Not Actually Indie Since: Jan, 2001
Not Actually Indie
#3: Nov 19th 2011 at 2:55:08 PM

As a rule of thumb, if you hear about a possible "miracle cure" for cancer, odds are it's not going to be implemented because it simply doesn't work.

Not that it's theoretically impossible for any simple and effective cure for cancer ever to work, but there have been a lot of touted "miracle cures" before, all of which have turned out not to be.

Publication pressures on researchers give them a strong professional incentive to oversell the significance of their work.

...eventually, we will reach a maximum entropy state where nobody has their own socks or underwear, or knows who to ask to get them back.
LostAnarchist Violence Is Necessary! from Neo Arcadia Itself Since: Sep, 2011
Violence Is Necessary!
#4: Nov 19th 2011 at 4:03:20 PM

[up] I hope that's the case, because I've been learning about a mineral that could keep certain kinds of it at bay.

This is where I, the Vampire Mistress, proudly reside: http://liberal.nationstates.net/nation=nova_nacio
TuefelHundenIV Night Clerk of the Apacalypse. from Doomsday Facility Corner Store. Since: Aug, 2009 Relationship Status: I'd need a PowerPoint presentation
Night Clerk of the Apacalypse.
#5: Nov 19th 2011 at 5:21:36 PM

Right and if you folks pay attention a lot of these supposed cures are not really cures. The claims are at best dubious. Some of these magic bullet cure alls remind me of snake oil sales men.

Who watches the watchmen?
SeptimusHeap from Switzerland (Edited uphill both ways) Relationship Status: Mu
#6: Nov 20th 2011 at 7:49:49 AM

"but I do find it highly plausible that those with vested interests in current methods of cancer treatment would want to drown out a competing better one." This to me is usually a strong warning that some Conspiracy Theorist is caught up in a load of You Fail Economics Forever. If it's already patented it wouldn't work, and if it weren't, the "westen interests" would immediately change their "interest" towards the new cure. And a "miracle cure" is most likely not going to be one, period. "Miracles" have nothing lost in science.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
Add Post

Total posts: 6
Top