The Other Troper
![[up]](https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/smiles/arrow_up.png "[up]"){kind=icon}
We were discussion captions.
Hi
I noticed a complaint about the image quality so I took a stab at it; how's it look?
Nice! But smaller? The article is very short. Fine as-is though.
Becky: Who are you? The Mysterious Stranger: An angel. Huck: What's your name? The Mysterious Stranger: Satan.
The Other Troper
Description length is not a valid complaint against an image size. Eddie has made it clear that going below the line above examples is NOT an issue. It's going over the line below the examples that is to be avoided.
Works for me.
edited 17th May '12 8:43:59 AM by DragonQuestZ
I'm on the internet. My arguments are invalid.
Hi
Alright, it's up.
Something can look bad without being "against the rules".
Becky: Who are you? The Mysterious Stranger: An angel. Huck: What's your name? The Mysterious Stranger: Satan.
The Other Troper
The problem with that argument is going over the description line doesn't look bad to everyone.
Yes because everything I say is meant to imply everyone agrees with it.
edited 17th May '12 11:37:49 AM by rodneyAnonymous
Becky: Who are you? The Mysterious Stranger: An angel. Huck: What's your name? The Mysterious Stranger: Satan.
The Other Troper
Hey, if you just meant how you felt, then my comment is withdrawn.
I'm on the internet. My arguments are invalid.
I agree that it seems a bit outsize, mostly because it's so wide that the text column ends up looking strange. Still, that's probably better than the image looking grainy or something, so it's fine as-is.
Hi
Alright, I'm gonna go ahead and close this since the thread's run its course, but I'll work on a smaller version tonight and put it up.
Crown Description:
Nominations for replacement images:
Anything to do here? The Carameldansen pic looks fine to me. Can we close this?