Nov 2023 Mod notice:
There may be other, more specific, threads about some aspects of US politics, but this one tends to act as a hub for all sorts of related news and information, so it's usually one of the busiest OTC threads.
If you're new to OTC, it's worth reading the Introduction to On-Topic Conversations
and the On-Topic Conversations debate guidelines before posting here.
Rumor-based, fear-mongering and/or inflammatory statements that damage the quality of the thread will be thumped. Off-topic posts will also be thumped. Repeat offenders may be suspended.
If time spent moderating this thread remains a distraction from moderation of the wiki itself, the thread will need to be locked. We want to avoid that, so please follow the forum rules when posting here.
In line with the general forum rules, 'gravedancing' is prohibited here. If you're celebrating someone's death or hoping that they die, your post will get thumped. This rule applies regardless of what the person you're discussing has said or done.
Edited by Mrph1 on Nov 30th 2023 at 11:03:59 AM
A list of things the bill is spending money on.
USDA and the FDA would get $23.3 billion in discretionary funding, despite the White House’s calls for billions in cuts.
And Food for Peace, a food aid program that Trump wanted to eliminate, would get extra money, totaling $1.7 billion.
ARTS
Funding for the National Endowment for the Arts — which Trump’s budget would have cut — increases to $152.8 million. The National Gallery of Art gets $165.9 million, while the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts receives $40.5 million, both far above Trump’s request.
EDUCATION
The measure doesn’t include a single dollar for the private school vouchers that Education Secretary Betsy De Vos has made a key part of her tenure.
De Vos’ budget also proposed eliminating a $1.1 billion program for after-school programs. The omnibus not only rejected zeroing out the programs, but boosted them by $20 million to $1.2 billion.
The Trump budget also called for cutting the Federal Work-Study program in half — the omnibus instead gave it a $140 million boost.
The bill would block key parts of the Education Department’s effort to overhaul how it collects federal student loans.
It also boosts the funding for the Office of Civil Rights, which is in charge of investigating discrimination in schools. Appropriators said the money should be used for additional staff. The Trump administration has worked to shrink the office, which advocates complained was already understaffed.
ENVIRONMENT
The budget for the Environmental Protection Agency — which the White House sought to slash by one-third — escapes unscathed.
HEALTH
The National Institutes of Health, instead of seeing its budget shrink by $5.8 billion, will get a $3 billion increase — which lawmakers say is the largest ever.
Funding for the health department’s Title X grants program — called “America’s family planning program” — remains stable despite Trump’s proposal to eliminate it. (The administration is shifting the program’s to emphasize so-called natural family planning rather than traditional contraception.)
The Trump administration's proposed a 95 percent cut to the Office of National Drug Control Policy was rejected in the omnibus.
Congress keeps funding flat for the Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT office. Trump had proposed to slice its budget from $60 million to $38 million.
The White House in February proposed to cut the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health — CDC’s office dedicated to workplace health — by 41 percent and fold it into the National Institutes of Health. Congressional appropriators, meanwhile, trimmed the office’s $338 million budget by $3 million, or a less than 1 percent cut.
HOUSING
Community Development Block Grants would get a 10 increase funding increase in the omnibus. The Trump administration proposed to completely zero out its budget.
IMMIGRATION
The spending bill contains no major investment for a border wall with Mexico. There’s also no crackdown on so-called sanctuary cities that harbor undocumented immigrants.
TRANSPORTATION
Instead of eliminating a key grant program for transportation projects, the omnibus triples the funding to $1.5 billion.
The bill appropriates $2.6 billion for Capital Investment Grants for transit, which Trump’s budget wanted to wind down.
Trump wanted to cut the law enforcement reimbursement program for airports. The omnibus includes funding for that, too.
TL;DR version: Congress pretty much ignored his budget entirely.
edited 23rd Mar '18 11:03:27 AM by TheRoguePenguin
So, basically, Trump is making the GOP look sane in comparison.
Is this presidency a gigantic plot?
edited 23rd Mar '18 11:01:53 AM by Julep
Oh, bother.
![[up]](https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/smiles/arrow_up.png "[up]"){kind=icon}
That would require Trump to be willing to make himself look like an idiot to boost others.
Yeah, looking at reports on the bill it's... actually seeming pretty good. No wall funding, no giving money to Betsy De Vos, the main people complaining about it on the right were Sen. Paul and others that thought it did too much for the environment, and the left opposition is those that wish it helped the DREA Mers (though hopefully they won't keep yapping about that when they realize that they're hurting the DREA Mers and the party by clinging to that rhetoric).
Tobias, when you say "what consequences has Trump faced?!?" it's this kind of thing. Yes, it's not big and glitzy but this is a loss for him, one that wouldn't be possible if he didn't keep undermining himself. Now hopefully we'll still see some more exciting progress (and it's incredibly infuriating that A: he's still in power and B: he and his cronies are making millions of dollars off it), but it's not nothing.
Found a Youtube Channel with political stances you want to share? Hop on over to this page and add them.
Well said.
And I've found an article that is rather apropos Republicans aren't sticking up for Trump's immigration agenda.
Frankly I think this is because they see all the signs pointing towards a Blue Wave and really don't want to make things worse for themselves by supporting Trump's idiotic and rather unpopular policies.
"Sandwiches are probably easier to fix than the actual problems" -Hylarn
Trump wants to pass/veto bills on a line by line basis (which has already been ruled unconstitutional).
Can't see the GOP letting that fly, regardless.
Politics is the skilled use of blunt objects.
Just a harmless giant from a foreign land.
Someone take the Confederate Constitution away from him, he seems to be confused.
Figure of Hourai
He's also trying to convince people that it's Democrats that don't want to help with DACA. I don't think anyone's going to believe him.
Avatar Source
The Mod with the Migraine
So on my news feed, right after an article about how we're all doomed because "no one is left to restrain Trump," was a link to an Onion article, "Man's rapid rise through corporate structure shows how rapid turnover is." All I could think was, those two articles were made for each other.
Also in the news, the exercises between the US and South Korea may be cut short if Trump actually meets with Kim. Can't be playing war games when we might have actual war ... Full article text
edited 23rd Mar '18 12:07:34 PM by BlueNinja0
That’s the epitome of privilege right there, not considering armed nazis a threat to your life. - Silasw
Man, if I was a South Korean (or even in the country) I'd be scared shitless that Trump/the US would sell the place up the river in exchange for Kim giving up his nukes. No US presence means that the North might be tempted to use their conventional forces to conquer the place.
Politics is the skilled use of blunt objects.
Why would it? If the plan requires a scapegoat, it's even better when you find one that believes itself to be the mastermind.
In terms of conventional forces South Korea still has the edge over North Korea.
One of my friends on a forum I'm a member of is from South Korea. How scared should I be for his safety? I've tried contacting him, but he hasn't replied.
Figure of Hourai
Not very. The US military isn't stupid and North Korea doesn't have a death wish.
Avatar Source
The Mod with the Migraine
x3 Important note: there are US forces stationed permanently in South Korea. All US forces are not leaving the country just because these exercises are wrapping up early. Depending on the specifics of the exercises, extra units brought in for them will probably leave the area ... and go as far away as Japan.
Then again, one of the exercises is supposed to be an evacuation off a beach while under fire ...
That’s the epitome of privilege right there, not considering armed nazis a threat to your life. - Silasw
I was operating under the assumption that any de-nuking deal would involve a major drawback of the US presence in the South.
Now, such a deal is highly unlikely, but the specter is there. A more likely bad outcome is Trump simply getting fed up and launching an attack, or getting too aggressive and causing the KPA to panic.
Politics is the skilled use of blunt objects.
As an addendum to math72d9 said, consider that "whiteness" as a racial category was largely created for pretty racist reasons. It was constructed largely as a tool to foster a sense of solidarity between european immigrants to help, thusly solidifying the colonial hierarchy the european powers were creating, with europeans at the top and native populations, african slaves and other "non-whites" at the bottom. In Europe proper there has historically been plenty of xenophobia and racism between different european groups, which is the why the far-right's pan-european white solidarity narrative comes across as an obvious, racist lie.
This is also why it's considered extremely dodgy for people to go about trying to celebrate "white" culture, but celebrating your spanish heritage, or italian heritage, or irish heritage, or german heritage is perfectly fine.
edited 23rd Mar '18 12:46:30 PM by Draghinazzo
Something I came across I thought folks might find amusing:
PornHub greets bloggers after YouTube gun ban introduced
http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-43500714?SThisFB
edited 23rd Mar '18 12:31:18 PM by sgamer82
I apologize in advance
edited 23rd Mar '18 12:32:58 PM by megaeliz
I still think that's ignoring a lot of the signs. Trump clearly chose a man as pugnacious and pro-military as Bolton for a reason, and it's not even as though this is an isolated case. He's filling his entire Cabinet with people who aren't opposed to the idea of, well, getting involved in a land war in Asia.
x4 Italians and Irish were not considered White and were treated the same way Latinos and Muslims are for a long time in the US.
edited 23rd Mar '18 12:34:48 PM by Wariolander
Oh, bother.
Weren't you the same poster who brought up Infowars of all things as evidence that we'd be getting into a war with North Korea by today?
edited 23rd Mar '18 12:35:59 PM by M84
Disgusted, but not surprised
Yes, until it was necessary for them to be "white" to protect what being "white" meant. That was the point being made.
A procrastination in of itself
538 did a bit on this actully, they explained how Trump is bringing in new people based not on policy (where he’s very changeable) but on loyalty to him and a willingness to kiss his ass.[1]
Here's hoping he isn't wrong, if you catch my drift.
edited 23rd Mar '18 10:49:10 AM by sgamer82