Follow TV Tropes

Following

The General US Politics Thread

Go To

Nov 2023 Mod notice:


There may be other, more specific, threads about some aspects of US politics, but this one tends to act as a hub for all sorts of related news and information, so it's usually one of the busiest OTC threads.

If you're new to OTC, it's worth reading the Introduction to On-Topic Conversations and the On-Topic Conversations debate guidelines before posting here.

Rumor-based, fear-mongering and/or inflammatory statements that damage the quality of the thread will be thumped. Off-topic posts will also be thumped. Repeat offenders may be suspended.

If time spent moderating this thread remains a distraction from moderation of the wiki itself, the thread will need to be locked. We want to avoid that, so please follow the forum rules when posting here.


In line with the general forum rules, 'gravedancing' is prohibited here. If you're celebrating someone's death or hoping that they die, your post will get thumped. This rule applies regardless of what the person you're discussing has said or done.

Edited by Mrph1 on Nov 30th 2023 at 11:03:59 AM

tricksterson Never Trust from Behind you with an icepick Since: Apr, 2009 Relationship Status: Above such petty unnecessities
Never Trust
#75326: Mar 5th 2014 at 8:58:44 AM

@Pykrete: Because Obama is a liberal and thus unmanly and "mom jeans" are unmanly because "mom".

Trump delenda est
TrashJack from Deep within the recesses of the human mind (4 Score & 7 Years Ago) Relationship Status: is commanded to— WANK!
#75327: Mar 5th 2014 at 9:39:42 AM

[up] Last I checked, I thought Palin was a mother. Did she seriously attempt to denigrate mothers everywhere, including herself, just to get in another shot at Obama?

PotatoesRock Since: Oct, 2012
#75328: Mar 5th 2014 at 10:08:03 AM

Logical consistency is not in the Tea Party's vocabulary when it comes to Obama.

Thorn14 Gunpla is amazing! Since: Aug, 2010
Gunpla is amazing!
#75329: Mar 5th 2014 at 11:45:16 AM

Trying to dissect shit Palin and Bachmann say is a practice in futility.

You'll have an easier time understanding cats.

Blueeyedrat Since: Oct, 2010
#75330: Mar 5th 2014 at 11:46:20 AM

Watching a news blurb about the proposed military cuts, and senator Graham seriously made the argument that (paraphrased) we shouldn't gut our military today, because what if we have to invade Iran tomorrow?

Thorn14 Gunpla is amazing! Since: Aug, 2010
Gunpla is amazing!
#75331: Mar 5th 2014 at 11:57:48 AM

This is the guy who said this Ukraine thing is because of Obama and Bhengazi so....yeah, ignore what he says.

johnnyfog Actual Wrestling Legend from the Zocalo Since: Apr, 2010 Relationship Status: They can't hide forever. We've got satellites.
Actual Wrestling Legend
#75333: Mar 5th 2014 at 12:55:31 PM

I thought Palin was a mother.

A "mom" in the sense that you have children, and attend all the social events. But the children are more or less ornamental, and your main priority is buying Gucci and maintaining your figure while sipping mimosa.

I'm a skeptical squirrel
Pykrete NOT THE BEES from Viridian Forest Since: Sep, 2009
NOT THE BEES
#75334: Mar 5th 2014 at 12:56:37 PM

Cats aren't that hard to understand, really. Most of it comes down to "meow, serve me."

Of course, then I got the most glorious image of electing Unikitty to office.

Ogodei Fuck you, Fascist sympathizers from The front lines Since: Jan, 2011
Fuck you, Fascist sympathizers
#75336: Mar 5th 2014 at 1:20:08 PM

Not that he's allergic, just that he's ignoring his own findings. It's like if i took a gun, shot someone, pointed to the corpse and said "see, he's fine!"

Ramidel Since: Jan, 2001
#75338: Mar 5th 2014 at 3:53:52 PM

...I didn't realize Paul Ryan was actually stupid. He didn't massage his numbers at all, he posted them straight up and simply did not realize that they said exactly what the Democrats have been saying for years.

RadicalTaoist scratching at .8, just hopin' from the #GUniverse Since: Jan, 2001
scratching at .8, just hopin'
#75339: Mar 5th 2014 at 4:17:48 PM

Oh the comments on that article re: the Dalai Lama...I should have known better than to read them I really should've...

[up]He's not stupid, he's a hack. There's a difference between being incapable of intellectual integrity and being completely disinterested in it.

A breakdown of the President's budget proposal by what's cut and what's boosted.

Interactive infographic lets you know about inequality in your state.

Share it so that people can get into this conversation, 'cause we're not the only ones who think like this.
Fighteer Lost in Space from The Time Vortex (Time Abyss) Relationship Status: TV Tropes ruined my love life
Lost in Space
#75340: Mar 5th 2014 at 4:29:57 PM

"He's not stupid, he's a hack." There is nothing mutually exclusive about those two things.

"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"
Ramidel Since: Jan, 2001
#75341: Mar 5th 2014 at 4:33:02 PM

[up][up]So in other words...he's willfully saying that he's not saying what he's saying, without backpedaling on his findings?

Call me cynical, but anyone who's that divorced from intellectual integrity is either stupid or insane.

edited 5th Mar '14 4:33:16 PM by Ramidel

DeMarquis Since: Feb, 2010
#75342: Mar 5th 2014 at 4:33:42 PM

That's just what he wants you to think.

Ramidel Since: Jan, 2001
RadicalTaoist scratching at .8, just hopin' from the #GUniverse Since: Jan, 2001
scratching at .8, just hopin'
#75344: Mar 5th 2014 at 4:53:48 PM

@Fighteer: I do not contest your point. Though given how much money he's made off of the taxpayer I gotta wonder who's really the stupid one.

edited 5th Mar '14 4:54:11 PM by RadicalTaoist

Share it so that people can get into this conversation, 'cause we're not the only ones who think like this.
LeGarcon Blowout soon fellow Stalker from Skadovsk Since: Aug, 2013 Relationship Status: Gay for Big Boss
Blowout soon fellow Stalker
#75346: Mar 5th 2014 at 6:41:02 PM

Damn it Massachusetts

Oh really when?
NativeJovian Jupiterian Local from Orlando, FL Since: Mar, 2014 Relationship Status: Maxing my social links
Jupiterian Local
#75347: Mar 5th 2014 at 6:46:57 PM

Massachusetts' highest court ruled Wednesday that it is not illegal to secretly photograph underneath a person's clothing — a practice known as "upskirting" — prompting one prosecutor to call for a revision of state law.

The high court ruled that the practice did not violate the law because the women who were photographed while riding Boston public transportation were not nude or partially nude.

Yep, sounds like a pretty clear case of a badly written — or just out of date — law.

Really from Jupiter, but not an alien.
shimaspawn from Here and Now Since: May, 2010 Relationship Status: In your bunk
#75348: Mar 5th 2014 at 6:59:21 PM

Or even just a law that hasn't caught up with modern practices.

Reality is that, which when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. -Philip K. Dick
RavenWilder Since: Apr, 2009
#75349: Mar 5th 2014 at 7:12:28 PM

Why should that be illegal? If you're in a public space, you should be able to photograph anything you can see; I don't see why what angle you photograph someone from should be regulated.

LeGarcon Blowout soon fellow Stalker from Skadovsk Since: Aug, 2013 Relationship Status: Gay for Big Boss
Blowout soon fellow Stalker
#75350: Mar 5th 2014 at 7:13:16 PM

Because you're taking a picture up someone's skirt

Oh really when?

Total posts: 417,856
Top