Nov 2023 Mod notice:
There may be other, more specific, threads about some aspects of US politics, but this one tends to act as a hub for all sorts of related news and information, so it's usually one of the busiest OTC threads.
If you're new to OTC, it's worth reading the Introduction to On-Topic Conversations and the On-Topic Conversations debate guidelines before posting here.
Rumor-based, fear-mongering and/or inflammatory statements that damage the quality of the thread will be thumped. Off-topic posts will also be thumped. Repeat offenders may be suspended.
If time spent moderating this thread remains a distraction from moderation of the wiki itself, the thread will need to be locked. We want to avoid that, so please follow the forum rules when posting here.
In line with the general forum rules, 'gravedancing' is prohibited here. If you're celebrating someone's death or hoping that they die, your post will get thumped. This rule applies regardless of what the person you're discussing has said or done.
Edited by Mrph1 on Nov 30th 2023 at 11:03:59 AM
Last I checked, I thought Palin was a mother. Did she seriously attempt to denigrate mothers everywhere, including herself, just to get in another shot at Obama?
Logical consistency is not in the Tea Party's vocabulary when it comes to Obama.
Trying to dissect shit Palin and Bachmann say is a practice in futility.
You'll have an easier time understanding cats.
Watching a news blurb about the proposed military cuts, and senator Graham seriously made the argument that (paraphrased) we shouldn't gut our military today, because what if we have to invade Iran tomorrow?
This is the guy who said this Ukraine thing is because of Obama and Bhengazi so....yeah, ignore what he says.
A "mom" in the sense that you have children, and attend all the social events. But the children are more or less ornamental, and your main priority is buying Gucci and maintaining your figure while sipping mimosa.
I'm a skeptical squirrelCats aren't that hard to understand, really. Most of it comes down to "meow, serve me."
Of course, then I got the most glorious image of electing Unikitty to office.
Not that he's allergic, just that he's ignoring his own findings. It's like if i took a gun, shot someone, pointed to the corpse and said "see, he's fine!"
...I didn't realize Paul Ryan was actually stupid. He didn't massage his numbers at all, he posted them straight up and simply did not realize that they said exactly what the Democrats have been saying for years.
Oh the comments on that article re: the Dalai Lama...I should have known better than to read them I really should've...
He's not stupid, he's a hack. There's a difference between being incapable of intellectual integrity and being completely disinterested in it.
A breakdown of the President's budget proposal by what's cut and what's boosted.
Interactive infographic lets you know about inequality in your state.
Share it so that people can get into this conversation, 'cause we're not the only ones who think like this."He's not stupid, he's a hack." There is nothing mutually exclusive about those two things.
"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"So in other words...he's willfully saying that he's not saying what he's saying, without backpedaling on his findings?
Call me cynical, but anyone who's that divorced from intellectual integrity is either stupid or insane.
edited 5th Mar '14 4:33:16 PM by Ramidel
That's just what he wants you to think.
If so, I rest my case.
@Fighteer: I do not contest your point. Though given how much money he's made off of the taxpayer I gotta wonder who's really the stupid one.
edited 5th Mar '14 4:54:11 PM by RadicalTaoist
Share it so that people can get into this conversation, 'cause we're not the only ones who think like this.The CIA Allegedly Spied on a Senate Committee Investigating the CIA.
edited 5th Mar '14 6:38:47 PM by DeviantBraeburn
Everything is Possible. But some things are more Probable than others. JEBAGEDDON 2016Damn it Massachusetts
Oh really when?The high court ruled that the practice did not violate the law because the women who were photographed while riding Boston public transportation were not nude or partially nude.
Or even just a law that hasn't caught up with modern practices.
Reality is that, which when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. -Philip K. DickWhy should that be illegal? If you're in a public space, you should be able to photograph anything you can see; I don't see why what angle you photograph someone from should be regulated.
Because you're taking a picture up someone's skirt
Oh really when?
@Pykrete: Because Obama is a liberal and thus unmanly and "mom jeans" are unmanly because "mom".
Trump delenda est