Follow TV Tropes

Following

Poor performance, nonsensical title: Did Not Eat The Mousse

Go To

joeyjojojuniorshabadoo Since: Nov, 2010
#1: Jul 5th 2011 at 11:49:49 AM

So, can anyone tell me what this trope is from its name? For the record, it's when somebody gets punished for something they didn't do, because people around them did it, played for laughs. It's been around several years but has less than a hundred wicks and inbounds. I personally suggest renaming, but no good names are coming to me at the moment.

Thoughts?

EDIT: also, on an unrelated note,the real life section seems to be getting bloated and nattery.

edited 5th Jul '11 11:51:29 AM by joeyjojojuniorshabadoo

Deboss I see the Awesomeness. from Awesomeville Texas Since: Aug, 2009
MangaManiac Since: Aug, 2010
#4: Jul 5th 2011 at 11:59:36 AM

[up]Maybe I'm just being paranoid, but at a first glance that could be mistaken for just saying "I Didn't Do It!" ala Bart Simpson or just being framed for something in general.

edited 5th Jul '11 12:00:00 PM by MangaManiac

ArtisticPlatypus Resident pretentious dickwad from the bottom of my heart. Since: Jul, 2010
Resident pretentious dickwad
#5: Jul 5th 2011 at 1:00:54 PM

I like the current name. It's not very informative, but it's not misleading either, and once you read the trope and understand what it means, it sticks in the mind.

This implies, quite correctly, that my mind is dark and damp and full of tiny translucent fish.
petrie911 Since: Aug, 2009
#6: Jul 5th 2011 at 2:58:06 PM

Guilt by Association, perhaps? The Real Life section gives Collective Punishment as a term for it, though that's a bit boring.

EDIT: OK, it seems Guilt by Association already points to an article. Of course, since it's only a redirect, it could be repurposed for this one.

^Being completely opaque until you read the article does not make for a good trope name.

edited 5th Jul '11 2:59:10 PM by petrie911

Belief or disbelief rests with you.
TheJackal Lurker from the UK Since: Dec, 2009
Lurker
#7: Jul 5th 2011 at 3:08:24 PM

Yeah, a name this difficult to search for isn't going to work even if it does make sense after reading the article, because no one's going to be able to find the article to read in the first place. And this one has been there for years, yet obviously hasn't caught on.

I like Guilt by Association as a replacement. I can see why it was redirected to Hitler Ate Sugar, but it seems more appropriate for this. I'm not so sure about Collective Punishment, because while that gets across that a whole group's being punished for something, it doesn't get across that an innocent bystander's being punished with them, which seems to be the crux of the trope.

Deboss I see the Awesomeness. from Awesomeville Texas Since: Aug, 2009
I see the Awesomeness.
#8: Jul 5th 2011 at 5:46:54 PM

I think Guilt by Association Gag might work slightly better. It's a comedy trope after all.

Fight smart, not fair.
LouieW Loser from Babycowland Since: Aug, 2009
Loser
#9: Jul 6th 2011 at 3:56:22 PM

There is now a single proposition rename crowner about this subject here.

"irhgT nm0w tehre might b ea lotof th1nmgs i dont udarstannd, ubt oim ujst goinjg to keepfollowing this pazth i belieove iN !!!!!1 d
Discar Since: Jun, 2009
#10: Jul 19th 2011 at 8:15:58 PM

Crowner's done, I think. Is there any opposition to Guilt by Association Gag, or can we just swap to that?

Madrugada Zzzzzzzzzz Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: In season
Zzzzzzzzzz
#11: Jul 19th 2011 at 9:02:57 PM

I don't really like it. It's more Punishment For Association Gag — very often part of the gag is the person who shouldn't be punished proclaiming that fact, and the one dealing out the punishment agreeing that they aren't guilty, but stating that that fact isn't going to change anything.

...if you don’t love you’re dead, and if you do, they’ll kill you for it.
Deboss I see the Awesomeness. from Awesomeville Texas Since: Aug, 2009
I see the Awesomeness.
#12: Jul 20th 2011 at 2:49:38 AM

I'm okay with the punishment over guilt title.

Fight smart, not fair.
Discar Since: Jun, 2009
#13: Jul 20th 2011 at 2:38:16 PM

Anyone have any problems with Punishment For Association Gag? I added it as a redirect already.

edited 20th Jul '11 2:38:54 PM by Discar

Xtifr World's Toughest Milkman Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: Having tea with Cthulhu
World's Toughest Milkman
#14: Jul 20th 2011 at 3:09:05 PM

I think Guilt by Association Gag is a more likely search term, and guilt-by-association usually does imply punishment (the term does not mean, I feel guilty for hanging out with these guys), so I think there's little chance of confusion. But I don't feel strongly about the matter.

Speaking words of fandom: let it squee, let it squee.
LouieW Loser from Babycowland Since: Aug, 2009
Loser
#15: Jul 20th 2011 at 4:15:34 PM

There is now an alternative titles crowner for this trope here. Feel free to add names and edit options as you wish.

"irhgT nm0w tehre might b ea lotof th1nmgs i dont udarstannd, ubt oim ujst goinjg to keepfollowing this pazth i belieove iN !!!!!1 d
Daremo Misanthrope Supreme from Parts Unknown Since: May, 2010 Relationship Status: If it's you, it's okay
#16: Jul 20th 2011 at 5:20:15 PM

This is one I'll buy. I think Guilt plays a little better, though there's not a lot of difference.

Creed of the Happy Pessimist:Always expect the worst. Then, when it happens, it was only what you expected. All else is a happy surprise.
Deboss I see the Awesomeness. from Awesomeville Texas Since: Aug, 2009
I see the Awesomeness.
#17: Jul 20th 2011 at 5:45:33 PM

I like guilt better, both because "guilt by association" is a common term, and it's more compact lengthwise.

Fight smart, not fair.
32_Footsteps Think of the mooks! from Just north of Arkham Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: THIS CONCEPT OF 'WUV' CONFUSES AND INFURIATES US!
Think of the mooks!
#18: Jul 20th 2011 at 6:02:51 PM

I like Punishment For Association Gag better, since the trope is all about the punishment.

Reminder: Offscreen Villainy does not count towards Complete Monster.
Xtifr World's Toughest Milkman Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: Having tea with Cthulhu
World's Toughest Milkman
#19: Jul 20th 2011 at 6:39:28 PM

But when someone is being unfairly punished, they describe it as guilt-by-association. That's what the term means. I've never seen the term punishment-by-association used outside of this very discussion.

"Why are you grounded? You didn't do anything wrong!"
"Guilt by association. I was in the room when the TV was broken."

edited 20th Jul '11 6:39:43 PM by Xtifr

Speaking words of fandom: let it squee, let it squee.
32_Footsteps Think of the mooks! from Just north of Arkham Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: THIS CONCEPT OF 'WUV' CONFUSES AND INFURIATES US!
Think of the mooks!
#20: Jul 21st 2011 at 4:18:48 AM

But not every example is even about guilt - there are times when this happens when the innocence of the party in question is actually known - it just goes forward anyhow for whatever reason. Mentioning "guilt" in the title isn't bad, per se, but since the trope is actually about the punishment, I feel it makes for a better trope title.

Reminder: Offscreen Villainy does not count towards Complete Monster.
Xtifr World's Toughest Milkman Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: Having tea with Cthulhu
World's Toughest Milkman
#21: Jul 21st 2011 at 5:30:50 AM

[up]Even when the innocence of the party is known, it's still called guilt by association. That's the standard term.

Speaking words of fandom: let it squee, let it squee.
32_Footsteps Think of the mooks! from Just north of Arkham Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: THIS CONCEPT OF 'WUV' CONFUSES AND INFURIATES US!
Think of the mooks!
#22: Jul 21st 2011 at 6:49:50 AM

[up]But "guilt by association" is the judgment. We're talking about the punishment.

Reminder: Offscreen Villainy does not count towards Complete Monster.
Shale Mighty pirate! from Int'l House of Mojo Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: You cannot grasp the true form
Mighty pirate!
#23: Jul 21st 2011 at 6:51:30 AM

I added an option for Punishment By Association as a way of splitting the difference.

Deboss I see the Awesomeness. from Awesomeville Texas Since: Aug, 2009
I see the Awesomeness.
#24: Jul 21st 2011 at 1:56:58 PM

I think it's vitally important to have a "gag" at the end so people know it's a comedy trope rather than just any instance.

Fight smart, not fair.
shimaspawn from Here and Now Since: May, 2010 Relationship Status: In your bunk
#25: Jul 26th 2011 at 12:33:54 PM

This has been active for a week and it looks like it's stabilized. Unless there are any objections, I'm going to lock the crowner and do the rename.

Reality is that, which when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. -Philip K. Dick

SingleProposition: DidNotEatTheMousse
6th Jul '11 3:46:45 PM

Crown Description:

Vote up for yes, down for no.

Total posts: 26
Top