Follow TV Tropes

Following

Down with political parties!

Go To

Kexruct nonarySpade from Vvardenfell Since: Mar, 2011
nonarySpade
#1: Jun 3rd 2011 at 1:05:33 PM

People have opinions. That is a simple fact. But do people only have one of two different opinions? Absolutely not. So why are there only two major political parties in the States? Why can't people just say their opinions. Sure, things might be a little more complex, but it would solve a ton of problems. What do you think?

They call themselves seamstresses -Feet Of Clay
Enkufka Wandering Student ಠ_ಠ from Bay of White fish Since: Dec, 2009
Wandering Student ಠ_ಠ
#2: Jun 3rd 2011 at 1:07:57 PM

I agree totally... and then they would form into 4 defacto major parties and a bunch of smaller coalitions. And even then, the more conservative party would be more powerful than any single party which opposed it. I am for it were it to work, and against it because it won't work in this political climate.

Very big Daydream Believer. "That's not knowledge, that's a crapshoot!" -Al Murray "Welcome to QI" -Stephen Fry
Kexruct nonarySpade from Vvardenfell Since: Mar, 2011
nonarySpade
#3: Jun 3rd 2011 at 1:09:44 PM

Oh, I acknowledge that. Political parties would be formed regardless, but I still think it's dumb.

They call themselves seamstresses -Feet Of Clay
Enkufka Wandering Student ಠ_ಠ from Bay of White fish Since: Dec, 2009
Wandering Student ಠ_ಠ
#4: Jun 3rd 2011 at 1:14:00 PM

True.

I just think of an old quote about capitalism that seems to fit: "The worst economic system we have is capitalism, except of course for all the other ones."

Just change capitalism to two party system.

But yeah, I'd much rather have a progressive party and or a liberal party...

Very big Daydream Believer. "That's not knowledge, that's a crapshoot!" -Al Murray "Welcome to QI" -Stephen Fry
Tzetze DUMB from a converted church in Venice, Italy Since: Jan, 2001
DUMB
#5: Jun 3rd 2011 at 1:15:50 PM

I thought that that quote was originally about democracy*

.

[1] This facsimile operated in part by synAC.
Enkufka Wandering Student ಠ_ಠ from Bay of White fish Since: Dec, 2009
Wandering Student ಠ_ಠ
#6: Jun 3rd 2011 at 1:18:39 PM

It might well have been. I saw it like 3 days ago and I forgot what the context was.

Very big Daydream Believer. "That's not knowledge, that's a crapshoot!" -Al Murray "Welcome to QI" -Stephen Fry
SlightlyEvilDoctor Needs to be more Evil Since: May, 2011
Needs to be more Evil
#7: Jun 3rd 2011 at 1:18:56 PM

The game designers just did a crappy job on the US electoral system, there's a two-party degenerate strategy that ruins everything. You get more political variety in Europe, where small parties can weight in on elections in a meaningful way.

Point that somewhere else, or I'll reengage the harmonic tachyon modulator.
Tzetze DUMB from a converted church in Venice, Italy Since: Jan, 2001
DUMB
#8: Jun 3rd 2011 at 1:20:36 PM

So why are there only two major political parties in the States?

There's ol' Duverger.

[1] This facsimile operated in part by synAC.
TheProffesor The Professor from USA Since: Jan, 2011
#9: Jun 3rd 2011 at 1:27:20 PM

Potlitical parties are neccesary. Politics without them would be madness. Every person would voice their opinion and everyone would vote for themselves. It would be a train wreck.

AllanAssiduity Since: Dec, 1969
#10: Jun 3rd 2011 at 1:37:02 PM

Political parties form from people uniting together. If there's me and you working together, we're more likely to get elected then one person alone. So, groups of similar interest work together until they become one group.

How to solve it? Get rid of First Past the Post and get a good electoral system instead.

Add Post

Total posts: 10
Top