Cell Phones and cancer:

Total posts: [20]
1 pvtnum1131st May 2011 11:18:59 AM from Kerbin low orbit , Relationship Status: We finish each other's sandwiches
Happiness is zero-gee with a sinus cold.
Meh, again? I'm confused but I don't really believe it. Too many times the opinions were switched back and forth for me to take it seriously
"Take your (...) hippy dream world, I'll take reality and earning my happiness with my own efforts" - Barkey
3 feotakahari31st May 2011 11:25:13 AM from Looking out at the city
Fuzzy Orange Doomsayer
Found the study.

Inconsistent findings suggest possible false positives due to multiple comparisons and thus replication is needed.
That's Feo . . . He's a disgusting, mysoginistic, paedophilic asshat who moonlights as a shitty writer—Something Awful
Lover of masks.
This kinda hinges on cellphone radiation being dangerous. Considering that its such a tiny scource I doubt it matters.
More people will likely die from distracted driving while using a cell phone than the radiation.

6 pvtnum1131st May 2011 11:49:20 AM from Kerbin low orbit , Relationship Status: We finish each other's sandwiches
blueharp: Yeah, I'm of the same mindset - driving while texting or having the thing glued to your ear is far more hazardous.

edited 31st May '11 11:49:31 AM by pvtnum11

Happiness is zero-gee with a sinus cold.
7 Deboss31st May 2011 12:23:04 PM from Awesomeville Texas
I see the Awesomeness.
Is this article even worth reading or is it just more You Can Panic Now?

edited 31st May '11 12:23:39 PM by Deboss

8 SpookyMask31st May 2011 12:30:08 PM from Corner in round room , Relationship Status: Non-Canon
Insert title
Huh, some research by Finnish researchers lately said opposite o-o Though, they noted that it might be wrong since cell phones are relatively new thing.
Time to change the style, for now
9 Enkufka31st May 2011 02:10:24 PM from Bay of White fish
Wandering Student ಠ_ಠ
Ignoring. The radiation from a cellphone, as illustrated on an xkcd comic, if I recall, is utterly inconsequential. More concerned with Cellphones exploding gasoline, and that's bullcrap as well.
Very big Daydream Believer.

"That's not knowledge, that's a crapshoot!" -Al Murray

"Welcome to QI" -Stephen Fry
10 TheyCallMeTomu31st May 2011 02:37:59 PM , Relationship Status: Anime is my true love
My dad had a cell phone and died of Glioblastoma related complications. Ipso facto, cell phones cause cancer, quid pro quo.

Of course, he also worked with industrial CRT monitors in his 30s...

edited 31st May '11 2:38:28 PM by TheyCallMeTomu

To begin with, the question was far less “can cell phones cause widespread outbreaks of cancer.” If that were the case, we’ve been using them for decades now, and brain cancer rates would be skyrocketing.

The question has always been whether or not certain people who might have a genetic predisposition to very specific kinds of brain tumors might be placed at a higher risk factor by putting something like a cell phone near their head all the time.

And this study’s results are basically like shaking up a magic eightball and getting an “Ask again later”.

12 Pykrete31st May 2011 03:07:07 PM from Viridian Forest
It's not that radiation from a cellphone is inconsequential, it's that it's non-ionizing. It's like trying to break a steel car door by slowly rolling marbles into it. Doesn't matter how long you do it, you're not going to cause plastic damage.

Tumors and cellphones might be linked by any number of external factors common to tumors and people who use cellphones too much, but the relationship wouldn't be causal.

edited 31st May '11 3:09:24 PM by Pykrete

13 TheyCallMeTomu31st May 2011 04:29:28 PM , Relationship Status: Anime is my true love
It would, however, mean that if you happen to use cell phones a lot, you as a person are generally at a higher risk of getting brain cancer for some reason or another.
14 pvtnum1131st May 2011 04:45:42 PM from Kerbin low orbit , Relationship Status: We finish each other's sandwiches
Oh, so you own a cell phone? ...wait, was that the sound of your insurance premium going up?
Happiness is zero-gee with a sinus cold.
15 TheyCallMeTomu31st May 2011 04:48:25 PM , Relationship Status: Anime is my true love
Assuming a free market (HA), it would only mean premiums are going up relative to the premiums of everyone who doesn't have a cell phone.
16 MarkVonLewis31st May 2011 04:49:43 PM from Somewhere in Time , Relationship Status: Too sexy for my shirt
Well, I will treat this new way of acquiring cancer with the same indifferent mindset of "fuck it."

Besides, as some of the studies have found varying results, I think it's more a case of someone who is already predisposed to cancer might have that accelerated by cell phone radiation.
Medusa strippers, where the phrase "my eyes are up here" is a dangerous phrase.
17 TheyCallMeTomu31st May 2011 04:50:58 PM , Relationship Status: Anime is my true love
It's entirely plausible that something might not cause cancer, but might prevent apoptosis. After all, nicotine itself doesn't cause cancer, but can be prohibitive towards causing cancer cell death.
Cellular phones cannot give you cancer, only hepatitis.

edited 31st May '11 4:58:45 PM by petrie911

Belief or disbelief rests with you.
If cellphones don't give you cancer, and researches keep the P=.95 standard for studies on them, 1 in 20 well-conducted studies should show that cellphones give you cancer.

Presumably this is the one. Or else poorly conducted.
I'm convinced that our modern day analogues to ancient scholars are comedians. -0dd1
20 del_diablo1st Jun 2011 01:54:52 AM from Somewher in mid Norway
Den harde nordmann
Besides, it is not like Cellphones radiate twice as much as the background radiation in Cambridge.
Going by the official statistics in my country: The background radiation here is roughly on the same level as by cellphones... so yeah.
A guy called dvorak is tired. Tired of humanity not wanting to change to improve itself. Quite the sad tale.
The system doesn't know you right now, so no post button for you.
You need to Get Known to get one of those.

Total posts: 20