Follow TV Tropes

Following

Make YMMV or Trivia: Death Of The Author

Go To

MewersAreVorons Since: Apr, 2011
#1: Apr 29th 2011 at 12:32:07 AM

Word of God has a trivia banner, so I don't see why this doesn't.

Whuh?
FastEddie Since: Apr, 2004
#2: Apr 29th 2011 at 3:41:26 AM

It is definitely an objective trope and already does not have examples.

Goal: Clear, Concise and Witty
RavenWilder Since: Apr, 2009
#3: Apr 29th 2011 at 6:04:21 AM

Well . . . it's not exactly a trope. It's a criticism tool, not something that occurs within the story itself.

CrypticMirror Cryptic Mirror from Scotland Since: Jan, 2001
#4: Apr 29th 2011 at 6:16:03 AM

Word of God is trivia because it is something that someone says in addition to the canon they produce. it is nice to know their opinion, but it isn't an essential part of the work. Death of the Author is literary analysis concept. A way of explaining how fiction and narrative works, not extra tid-bits. Word of God is more like a DVD extras-commentary track or an author doing their own "oh by the way" type of thing. The meta index is the right place, but it could equally go under useful notes.

edited 29th Apr '11 6:19:16 AM by CrypticMirror

CrypticMirror Cryptic Mirror from Scotland Since: Jan, 2001
#5: Apr 29th 2011 at 6:45:08 AM

incidentally I'm not seeing the Trope Repair Shop label on the Death of the Author article itself.

Discar Since: Jun, 2009
#6: May 5th 2011 at 7:44:14 PM

It is now. Someone else must have fixed it.

And I'd say make it YMMV. Some fans feel this way towards their favorite series, others don't. Star Wars stands out as an example. George Lucas says some weird stuff about it, and a lot of fans like it better if they ignore him. But Your Mileage May Vary. Hence the need for the banner.

CrypticMirror Cryptic Mirror from Scotland Since: Jan, 2001
#7: May 5th 2011 at 8:16:30 PM

It is a meta concept, and already flagged as such. It seems to be fine.

Madrugada Zzzzzzzzzz Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: In season
Zzzzzzzzzz
#8: May 5th 2011 at 8:19:16 PM

I'd agree on both counts, that's it's not a trope used in creating fiction, it's a literary criticism position; and that it should be YMMV. Whether someone accepts it as a valid position is entirely their choice.

It can be objectively stated that this critic or that one uses it or doesn't, but that should only be on pages for the critics themselves, not on works pages, since we've already gone in the direction that what critics say about a work shouldn't be included on the work's page.

...if you don’t love you’re dead, and if you do, they’ll kill you for it.
Deboss I see the Awesomeness. from Awesomeville Texas Since: Aug, 2009
I see the Awesomeness.
#9: May 5th 2011 at 9:54:33 PM

Should we have a Cirticism Terms index? We could stick stuff like Mary Sue on it.

Fight smart, not fair.
BobbyG vigilantly taxonomish from England Since: Jan, 2001
vigilantly taxonomish
#10: May 6th 2011 at 9:09:07 AM

^ I'd support that idea.

I'm less keen on the idea of tagging it as YMMV because the term does denote an actual phenomenon in the field of literary criticism, whether tropers approve of said phenomenon or not.

Welcome To TV Tropes | How To Write An Example | Text-Formatting Rules | List Of Shows That Need Summary | TV Tropes Forum | Know The Staff
Raso Cure Candy Since: Jul, 2009
Cure Candy
#11: May 6th 2011 at 9:14:01 AM

[up][up] Good index idea there.

I want to say that we should have an "Undisputed, as it did happen, but brings others opinions of it into the mix" banner (I probably explained that really badly.)

Sparkling and glittering! Jan-Ken-Pon!
SilentReverence adopting kitteh from 3 tiles right 1 tile up Since: Jan, 2010
adopting kitteh
#12: May 6th 2011 at 9:34:05 AM

I agree. That people's opinion about a thing might be more or less receiving does not undo the fact that the thing itself exists, objectively.

Fanfic Recs orwellianretcon'd: cutlocked for committee or for Google?
Add Post

Total posts: 12
Top