In my honest opinion, I believe the current trope name will always have a chance of being misconstrued as being narrower than it is with the phrase Has No Accent in the title, regardless of any number of other words are in the title with it.
The word "Impostor" certainly doesn't need the most emphasis in any case no matter what though. We're dealing with a trope that calls attention to a detail about an impostor (albiet a detail that is much more general than anything to do with accents); that should be emphasized more than anything about the existence of an impostor itself.
edited 27th Mar '11 10:42:48 AM by SeanMurrayI
The Jamie in the title is (as mentioned by someone else) from old Doctor Who. The reason his name is used is because when his body was body-snatched in one episode, the body-snatcher didn't keep Jamie's iconic Scottish accent. That said, I still agree that the name could cause some confusion. I like Something About You Isnt Right, personally.
And with the magical new system, we can do it without a ptitle.
Fight smart, not fair.Bumping this back from the dead...
edited 11th Sep '11 2:13:19 PM by Discovery
Currently reading a Sci-Fi Dystopian Murder Mystery Forbidden Romance Adventure Thriller In Space. Your argument is invalid.What was the plan again? Imposter Bob Has No Accent?
Fight smart, not fair.I believe so. If we assign it to Bob then it's obviously a placeholder name.
Reality is that, which when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. -Philip K. DickStill sounds like it's just about accents, IMO.
I agree with Sean and Doctorvon that mentioning accents in the name is likely to limit the uptake of the trope. Maybe something like Imposter Forgot One Detail?
Speaking words of fandom: let it squee, let it squee.I like Flawed Impersonation from earlier in the thread, though Impostor Forgot One Detail is a bit more specific. If nothing else, I have to point out that everyone has an accent, so saying someone has no accent is completely wrong (sorry, I'll stop being a linguist for now).
Reminder: Offscreen Villainy does not count towards Complete Monster.Maybe something like Flawed Imposter or Missing Mannerism Imposter?
Currently reading a Sci-Fi Dystopian Murder Mystery Forbidden Romance Adventure Thriller In Space. Your argument is invalid.Flawed Impersonation sounds like it could be referring to a really bad stand-up comic doing lame impressions of a famous person. But it's still better than any of the options that mention accents.
Speaking words of fandom: let it squee, let it squee.I don't. It sounds more like failing Something Only They Would Say than this trope.
edited 23rd Sep '11 5:48:02 PM by shimaspawn
Reality is that, which when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. -Philip K. DickShould we put a crowner up, then?
Currently reading a Sci-Fi Dystopian Murder Mystery Forbidden Romance Adventure Thriller In Space. Your argument is invalid.I'll suggest Identifiable Impostor myself.
I broadly interpret the concept behind this trope as, "A character's doppelganger possessing some trait or traits that the original character does not have so as to to allow an audience to more easily distinguish between the two (even if other characters may not notice)."
edited 24th Sep '11 10:42:35 AM by SeanMurrayI
Identifiable Impostor sounds good to me.
Crowner created. It can be found here.
Hold on a tick, you skipped the single-prop. The current name works fine—we shouldn't need to rename at all.
Rhymes with "Protracted."10 wicks is not "works fine", and the trope has nothing to do with accents, so the name is misleading and likely to see continued severe underuse for non-accent-related instances. "Works fine" is an argument for established tropes. It doesn't apply to just-launched ones. "Good enough" might apply to the just-launched, but I think you'll find few agree with you if you try to argue that in this case.
Speaking words of fandom: let it squee, let it squee.I don't see any reason to think it's because of the name. It was launched prematurely—it didn't gather enough examples and it never got cross-wicking. Sending it back to YKTTW to gather more examples would be a better solution than renaming.
edited 24th Sep '11 7:43:46 PM by troacctid
Rhymes with "Protracted."It has all the hallmarks of a bad name: it's misleading, overly specific, and generally non-indicative. But I'm fine with cutting it and sending it back to YKTTW to get a good name and more examples.
Speaking words of fandom: let it squee, let it squee.I think a cut and more time in the YKTTW oven might be a good thing.
Reality is that, which when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. -Philip K. DickBumping. I would actually prefer The Imposter Forgot One Detail, really. That said, yes, this is one of the tropes among many Whovians launched with only their show in mind.
Crown Description:
I think it should at least be Imposter Bob Has No Accent because otherwise it looks like the trope emphasis is on Has No Accent rather than Imposter. It makes the trope seem narrower than it is. That said, I have no idea who the Jamie in the current title is.
Reality is that, which when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. -Philip K. Dick