Follow TV Tropes

Following

What's this supposed to be about?: Summer Campy

Go To

SantosLHalper Since: Aug, 2009
#1: Mar 1st 2011 at 7:34:07 PM

Really. Is this supposed to be about bad Summer Camps, or just Summer Camps in fiction in general?

edited 1st Mar '11 7:34:16 PM by SantosLHalper

troacctid "µ." from California Since: Apr, 2010
#2: Mar 1st 2011 at 8:05:15 PM

What I'm getting from the examples list is "Summer camp as a stock setting," but none of that is in the description. I think it's trying too hard to be clever.

Rhymes with "Protracted."
Tzintzuntzan Since: Jan, 2001
#3: Mar 1st 2011 at 9:17:37 PM

I'm the guilty party that wrote it, and it's a stock setting: a summer camp that's a comic-opera hellhole, which makes the company in Dilbert look well-managed. (The YKTTW, which I think is still recoverable, states this clearly.)

The reason I think the description works is that only about half the examples are mine; the other half were added by tropers who don't seem to have had any trouble understanding it.

That said, it's possible that the in-character opening confuses people. The reason I wrote it this way is that many a Summer Campy has a scene where the main character writes a letter exactly like this, which is usually a big Lampshade Hanging on everything that's happened. (And, of course, because I find in-character writing to be more interesting than a bland list, provided it doesn't confuse the reader. Which it may be doing here.)

vilefile from beneath you it devours. Since: Oct, 2011
#4: Mar 1st 2011 at 10:32:39 PM

Yeah, kind of sacrificing clarity for style. I can think of two solutions that would preserve the in-character letter:

1. Change the name to Summer Camp Setting or even Summer Camp Stock Setting - something that makes it really really obvious what this is. (Doable - only 30 wicks/22 inbounds)

2. Cut the in-character letter down a little, maybe set it in italics, end it with a "With Love, your son Billy" or whatever. Then spell the trope out in an out-of-character sentence or two below it.

unhappyyak :( from Minneapolis Since: Apr, 2009
:(
#5: Aug 3rd 2011 at 9:56:49 AM

I'd say use both solutions. The clearer, the better.

First key to interpreting a work: Things mean things.
SantosLHalper Since: Aug, 2009
#6: Oct 16th 2011 at 4:37:07 PM

Is anyone volunteering to clean this up? It's been over half a year since I posted this.

edited 16th Oct '11 4:37:43 PM by SantosLHalper

Auxdarastrix Since: May, 2010
#7: Oct 16th 2011 at 7:14:34 PM

I added the non-self-demonstrating version from the original YKTTW in a folder at the bottom.

Elle Since: Jan, 2001
#8: Oct 16th 2011 at 7:46:20 PM

I say swap it entirely for the non-Self-Demonstrating one - I can't think of a good way to edit it that both preserves the description and describes the trope well.

Add Post

Total posts: 9
Top