I don't mean to belittle Watson, it is pretty cool, but it's not going to go all overthrowing humans or creating robot armies or anything. As far as I can tell its programming isn't designed to be generating original content.
edited 25th Feb '11 12:35:41 AM by melloncollie
Pft, as if we should fight Skynet.
Fight smart, not fair.I, for one, welcome our new computer overlords.
Also, I demand that they shrink Watson's parser to a manageable size and install it in our cell phones so when you "Please say a command" it doesn't always reply "Did you say cheese parfait?"
I want one that says "By your command" instead.
Fight smart, not fair.Actually, since it analyzes millions of documents with thousands of different algorithms, it's never that simple. Here's a sample of some of the evidence that could have contributed to the uncertainty.
There's a bunch of weak evidence connecting Toronto to being a US city. For example, it's search turned up something like 8 different cities in the US named Toronto. Furthermore, Toronto, Canada appears on a list of "American and Canadian cities". Toronto is also referenced in an article about fictional US presidents. However, Watson realized that all this evidence is really weak. Ordinarily it would have been ignored, but when you're not sure what the answer it, it may have provided a slight increase in confidence.
Another important point to remember is that just because the category is "US Cities" doesn't mean that the answer is always a U.S. city. For example, there was a previous round in Jeopardy where one of the US City questions had the answer "What is shuffleboard".
Blind Final Fantasy 6 Let's PlayJust had a thought: no one should ever load information on Watson into Watson's databanks. If you do that, you're just asking for it to become self-aware.
Oh, my bad, I was greatly misinformed. Nevermind.