Follow TV Tropes

Following

What do the examples do?: Het Is Ew

Go To

troacctid "µ." from California Since: Apr, 2010
#26: Feb 20th 2011 at 4:52:05 PM

[up] What about examples from fanfics, then?

Rhymes with "Protracted."
shimaspawn from Here and Now Since: May, 2010 Relationship Status: In your bunk
#27: Feb 20th 2011 at 5:01:23 PM

If it's explicitly stated in the text of the fanfic, then it counts as In-Universe. If it's just the "fandom as a whole" then it doesn't.

Reality is that, which when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. -Philip K. Dick
Grobi Since: Sep, 2010
Discar Since: Jun, 2009
#29: Jul 14th 2011 at 1:08:12 PM

Did anyone go through and clean the examples? It doesn't look like it, but most of them are fanfic examples, just organized according to the source material.

Ramidel (Before Time Began) Relationship Status: Above such petty unnecessities
#30: Jul 23rd 2011 at 8:38:19 AM

That's because the page itself says "Fandoms this trope is especially prevalent in."

So it's a discussion of an Audience Reaction, not a trope.

I despise hypocrisy, unless of course it is my own.
Ghilz Perpetually Confused from Yeeted at Relativistic Velocities Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: Barbecuing
Perpetually Confused
#31: Jul 23rd 2011 at 10:19:50 AM

That still doesnt change that the examples have nothing to do with the trope

It just lists homosexual pairings. Thats not what the trope is for

Anyway, made single prop crowner on keeping the examples or not.

edited 23rd Jul '11 10:20:08 AM by Ghilz

shimaspawn from Here and Now Since: May, 2010 Relationship Status: In your bunk
#32: Jul 23rd 2011 at 10:23:05 AM

Crowner hooked.

Reality is that, which when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. -Philip K. Dick
Ramidel (Before Time Began) Relationship Status: Above such petty unnecessities
#33: Jul 25th 2011 at 2:04:30 AM

So wait, let me clarify.

Is the single prop also there to redefine the trope? Because I don't think you can do an In Universe Examples Only on an Audience Reaction without changing the trope definition.

I despise hypocrisy, unless of course it is my own.
shimaspawn from Here and Now Since: May, 2010 Relationship Status: In your bunk
#34: Jul 25th 2011 at 5:44:40 AM

It's been done many times. Squee is a good example. It basically turns the trope from an Audience Reaction, to a Character Reaction, but the core trope doesn't change.

Reality is that, which when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. -Philip K. Dick
Discar Since: Jun, 2009
Falco Since: Mar, 2011
#36: Aug 28th 2011 at 9:33:43 PM

Cut examples. No need for 'em.

"You want to see how a human dies? At ramming speed." - Emily Wong.
hieronymuserroneous hieronymuserroneous from Cockaigne Since: Jan, 2010
hieronymuserroneous
#37: Sep 8th 2011 at 10:08:21 PM

I'm not wholly convinced of a need to get rid of all examples (aggressive deletion of non-examples is, however, clearly necessary), but there should definitely be a concise explanation of what this trope is and isn't within the article.

"A supporter once called out, 'Governor Stevenson, all thinking people are for you!' And Adlai Stevenson answered, 'That's not enough.
Ghilz Perpetually Confused from Yeeted at Relativistic Velocities Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: Barbecuing
Perpetually Confused
#38: Sep 15th 2011 at 1:33:33 AM

Crowner's been here forever, and is pretty decisive, will do it. Please lock

ThatHuman someone from someplace Since: Jun, 2010
someone
#39: Sep 15th 2011 at 2:51:08 AM

Okay, if the examples are for in-universe stuff now, should the description be rewritten to focus less on real life people who complain about het pairings?

something
Rynnec Killing is my business Since: Dec, 2010 Relationship Status: Healthy, deeply-felt respect for this here Shotgun
Killing is my business
#40: Oct 4th 2011 at 12:07:35 AM

I know this is bumping a relatively old topic, but is this the sort of page that really even needs examples? Why not make it a trivia page or something?

"I'll show you fear, there is no hell, only darkness." My twitter
Routerie Since: Oct, 2011
#41: Oct 4th 2011 at 1:20:10 AM

Since this is a page about fan attitudes, not a trope about character opinions, in-universe examples don't really illustrate it. We may as well delete them.

ThatHuman someone from someplace Since: Jun, 2010
someone
#42: Oct 4th 2011 at 8:34:55 AM

The examples now make this confusing. The description is about attitudes towards works of fiction, yet the examples seem to include characters who are against actual*

heterosexual relationships, with no mention of how they feel about het fiction. Seriously, the only in-universe example that matches the description is the Yu-Gi-Oh The Abridged Series one.

Actually, this seems to be the same concern expressed in post 25.

edited 4th Oct '11 8:37:20 AM by ThatHuman

something
nuclearneo577 from My computer. Since: Dec, 2009
#43: Oct 6th 2011 at 8:04:44 PM

The examples were deleted. This can be locked.

Add Post

SingleProposition: HetIsEw
23rd Jul '11 10:18:35 AM

Crown Description:

Vote up for yes, down for no.

Total posts: 43
Top