Just how did he manage to get the video to show on here?
And I'm assuming by "he" you mean me, right? Even though it's the internet and completely ambiguous what gender I actually am .
Anyway to embed video you would do Double Brackets [[ youtube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v= CQT 0 No Ol Nz 4]]. Just put the youtube tags around the link to the video, and just use the URL after the "v="
edited 5th Jan '11 3:48:22 PM by Mattonymy
You are displaying abnormally high compulsions to over-analyze works of fiction and media. Diagnosis: TV Tropes Addiction.these new designs are pretty good...with the exception of Bugs. I'm not sure what exactly about it bothers me, but it just doesn't look right.
The character designer recently released a new short that she's been working on for four years that starred a bunny, and that's basically how Bugs would look if he were a midget, had no gloves, and different color fur, and didn't talk. I suppose she can only draw one kind of rabbit.
^^ You seem to be have problems:
And what the code is suppose to look like: [[youtube : CQT0NoOlNz4 ]]
Just remove the spaces inside the brackets.
edited 5th Jan '11 4:02:42 PM by SatanicHamster
Nah, I just suck at explaining.
You are displaying abnormally high compulsions to over-analyze works of fiction and media. Diagnosis: TV Tropes Addiction.Ah it works now...Anyways getting back onto the topic. Daffy must be mistaking the catchphrase [[Garfield with a certain cat's catchphrase]].
Well they are both mammals. Maybe Daffy's that stupid.
You are displaying abnormally high compulsions to over-analyze works of fiction and media. Diagnosis: TV Tropes Addiction.Just found two videos on youtube regarding on this. First off better quality of the trailer. And somebody telling the haters to knock it off.
edited 7th Jan '11 5:58:21 PM by Playedforkeeps
I think, and I'm hoping, that the Looney Tunes show is one of those shows that probably only sounds bad in concept but turns out to be totally awesome. IMO it's similar to Regular Show in that I thought it would be completely stupid and boring, but JG Quintel managed to pull off the bizarre concept in a sophisticated manner. I'm hoping the show will turn out to be a mixture of the sitcom hilarity of Tiny Toon Adventures and Animaniacs mixed with the off the wall spontaneity of Duck Dodgers.
I just realized that aside from Baby Looney Tunes and...whatever the hell Loonatics Unleashed's connection was, The Looney Tunes Show is actually the first Looney Tunes show formatting for the actual characters themselves since their rerun episodes.
You are displaying abnormally high compulsions to over-analyze works of fiction and media. Diagnosis: TV Tropes Addiction.They were featured as themselves, in their old classic form, in Tiny Toon Adventures, but of course they did not appear often.
They also clearly weren't the main focus either, same with their cameos in Animaniacs.
You are displaying abnormally high compulsions to over-analyze works of fiction and media. Diagnosis: TV Tropes Addiction.Well, Taz got Taz Mania, and Daffy got Duck Dodgers.
Taz has a free pass from me for that show, but Daffy wasn't exactly playing himself in Duck Dodgers... at least, a character without his own name.
Speaking of which, I wonder if any of Daffy's many "hero" personas are going to make a return appearance. Most of them are pretty much similar "Impulsive Fake Ultimate Hero with an actually competent sidekick," which was at it's best in the first Duck Dodgers cartoon (which was just plain hilarious), except Duck Tracy, who mixed goofiness with awesome.
Also... "NEON NOODLE?!?"
edited 8th Jan '11 4:45:28 PM by KnownUnknown
"The difference between reality and fiction is that fiction has to make sense." - Tom Clancy, paraphrasing Mark Twain.The reason I didn't include either of those, as well as Sylvester And Tweety Mysteries, was because while it gave certain characters A Day in the Limelight it didn't feature the entire Looney Tunes cast. The Looney Tunes Show is the first one to do that and is such the first original throwback to the Looney Tunes' legacy.
Um how exactly do I say "that is the best $*#$ing idea for a Looney Tunes comeback and they definitely need to have Duck Twacy in the show" while being able to contain myself? Some other possible Daffy Duck Personas I'd want to see again:
- Dripalong Daffy
- Robin Hood Daffy
- Stupor Duck
- Dorlock Holmes
- original Duck Dodgers (that would be awesome)
He must've been channeling Sherlock Holmes in "Deducthe You Sthay".
It's too early to tell what kinds of humor this show will contain. It looks more kid-friendly than Animaniacs, so I doubt we'll get any pop culture references.
"First since the shorts to bring back all the characters as an ensemble cast." Nice. Actually, Space Jam did that pretty much. What other things can we claim this show will bring back since the original shorts?
Petunia?
Yes. Yes. Though, she was never very popular, even back then.
Let's see, besides Petunia we're also getting Melissa Duck (or a female duck that will hopefully be named her) and, ugh, Lola Bunny. But thankfully they're also bringing back somewhat forgotten characters like Witch Hazel and Gossamer who haven't been featured in anything for several years.
edited 8th Jan '11 6:56:21 PM by Mattonymy
You are displaying abnormally high compulsions to over-analyze works of fiction and media. Diagnosis: TV Tropes Addiction.Yeah. Though, Lola has been featured in a few other titles since then. I like how they're bringing back Witch Hazel.
Granny doesn't appear to be on the character design pic online, even though she's already credited to be in it! She does voice Hazel.
More character designs can be found on Cartoon's Brewery [1]
You are displaying abnormally high compulsions to over-analyze works of fiction and media. Diagnosis: TV Tropes Addiction.I've heard Pete Puma is in the show. This is very joy-inducing.
"The difference between reality and fiction is that fiction has to make sense." - Tom Clancy, paraphrasing Mark Twain.How many lumps?
Oooh, tree or four~
BUDABUDABUDABUDABUDABUDABUDABUDABUDABUDA
edited 8th Jan '11 9:31:13 PM by nomuru2d
Long live Cinematech. FC:0259-0435-4987
The animation seems better than I expected it to be, but whats up with the voice acting? Is it good?